Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

УТУКИН

@magic_utukin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,584subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002271423359
TypeChannel
Username@magic_utukin
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/magic_utukin

Growth

1,5841,5851,584.56 August 2026 — 1,585 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,585 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,584 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,584–1,585 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:521,584-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:471,585no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:311,585first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.3%
avg views ÷ 1,584 subscribers
Avg views / post
495
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (22 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,980
Reactions total151
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

334 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9829.3%
👍8224.6%
7923.7%
💯5717.1%
👏102.99%
👎61.80%
❤‍🔥20.599%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 334reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @magic_utukin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC315 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как правильно отказывать хантеру. Инструкция по сохранению мостов Недавно получил от статусного кандидата такой ответ на предложение обсудить вакансию. «С хантерами не разговариваю, кому надо, найдут меня сами», Почему я считаю, что это серьезная карьерная ошибка. У каждого кадрового агентства есть CRM-система, где фиксируется история всех касаний. Рынок обладает отличной памятью. Хантеры прекрасно помнят тех, кто

👍24💯135

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

5 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC433 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Засиделся. Когда ваша лояльность играет против вас Вы проработали в одной корпорации пятнадцать лет. Прошли путь от линейного руководителя до вице-президента. Вы гордитесь своей стабильностью и уверены, что рынок оторвет вас с руками. Вы выходите на открытый поиск и сталкиваетесь со стеной вежливых отказов. Проблема кроется в разнице восприятий. Для вас пятнадцать лет на одном месте означают надежность и глубокую

🔥26👍11

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

4 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC476 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему вы переплачиваете юристам вдвое. Заказчики, которые приходят к нам на хантинг, регулярно жалуются, почему хорошие кандидаты стоят так дорого. Я скажу вам причину, в этом виноваты сами работодатели. . Как выглядит стандартная заявка на подбор. В 90% случаев запрос звучит одинаково. Нужен старший юрист, возраст 28-35 лет, для консалтинга обязателен опыт в топ фирмах рейтинга «Право-300» или в инхаусе крупного б

💯20👍10👏10👎54🔥4

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

21 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC756 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Давно не было прожарки резюме в прямом в эфире. Пришла пора это исправить. В среду, 29 июля в 19:00, на площадке Moscow Digital School я проведу вебинар, где разберу резюме юристов в прямом эфире. Я ежедневно анализирую десятки профилей юристов и точно знаю, какие формулировки ведут к приглашению на интервью. Я дам пошаговый алгоритм составления резюме и готовый шаблон. Вам важно быть на эфире, если вы застряли в

🔥136

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

15 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC929 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Про ИИ в резюме. Каждый второй руководитель сегодня добавляет в резюме строчку об искусственном интеллекте. «Внедрял нейросети», «эксперт по ChatGPT», «промпт-инженер». На бумаге все выглядят технологичными визионерами. Пожалуйста, удалите это. Эти слова больше ничего не стоят. Требования рынка к подтверждению навыков кардинально изменились. То, что вы пишете в своем профиле, превращается из красивой самопрезентац

👍217💯4🔥2

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

14 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC857 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Иллюзия стабильности Самая опасная фраза, которую я регулярно слышу от опытных управленцев, звучит так: «Мне пока не до рынка, у меня все хорошо». Вы сидите в теплом кресле. У вас бонусы, выстроенная команда и понятные KPI. На редкие сообщения рекрутеров в LinkedIn вы не отвечаете. Вам кажется, что вы полностью контролируете свою карьеру. Это иллюзия. На уровне топ-менеджмента стабильность рушится внезапно. Она ни

18💯14👍6🔥2

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

1 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC790 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ambospacePhoto

Приглашаем на практикум: "Среда моего успеха" Какая часть вашего успеха зависит от вас, а какая — от условий, в которых вы действуете❓ Мы привыкли искать причины своих сложностей внутри себя. 〰 Недостаточно компетентен. Недостаточно настойчив. Нужно еще чему-то научиться, стать эффективнее, дисциплинированнее, увереннее. Но что, если это только часть ответа? 😡 Спортивный автомобиль не становится хуже, оказавшис

🔥4

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

1 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC637 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мои коллеги запускают практикум «Среда моего успеха». Я знаю авторов программы лично и абсолютно доверяю их экспертизе. Там нет накачки пустой мотивацией. Авторы дают сугубо прагматичный разбор ваших рабочих условий.

🔥4👍1

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

30 Jun 2026, 08:57 UTC736 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему второго шанса на собеседовании не будет Вы приходите на собеседование. Волнуетесь, сбиваетесь при рассказе о сложном проекте. Пытаетесь на ходу вспомнить нужные цифры. Нанимающий менеджер вежливо кивает. На следующий день вы получаете сухой отказ. Обидно, вы думаете: «Дайте мне время раскрыться, я эксперт, я просто пять лет не ходил по собеседованиям». Никакого второго шанса не будет. Рынок жесток, работодат

🔥228👍8💯6👎1

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

24 Jun 2026, 07:36 UTC671 viewsread 7 August 2026

Сходил на подкаст Costa de Rada к Дмитрию Емельянцеву из юрфирмы "Правый Берег". Душевно поговорили, порисовали, обсудили разное. Посмотрите, получилось интересно.

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

24 Jun 2026, 07:36 UTC773 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CostadeRada2025

🎙 Новый выпуск Costa de Rada с Дмитрием Утукиным! Дмитрий — основатель и руководитель компании по подбору персонала Magic Staff. В подкасте поговорили: 🔹 О пути от юриста до основателя кадрового агентства 🔹 О необычных кейсах подбора персонала 🔹 О секретах выбора кандидатов, красных флагах и технике активного слушания 🔹 Лишит ли искусственный интеллект юриста работы? 🔹 Как бразильское джиу-джитсу и сплав по го

🔥7❤‍🔥2

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

23 Jun 2026, 06:01 UTC773 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

За что бизнес переплачивает юристам в 2026 году? Завтра приму участие в карьерной конференции Moscow Digital School. Будет шесть самых актуальных тем: где сейчас лежат деньги и какие навыки реально покупает бизнес. Только аналитика и инструменты. Что в программе: 🟡 Рынок и деньги 🟡 Технологии 🟡 Стратегия карьерного роста 🟡Социальный капитал 🟡Карта будущего 🟡 Взгляд бизнеса Никакой воды. Каждый спикер отдаст участ

8🔥5

Signed Дмитрий Утукин

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @magic_utukin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 412,095 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“УТУКИН” (@magic_utukin), 1,584 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magic_utukin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.