Channel
@magic_NB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
257subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001737977386 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @magic_NB |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/magic_NB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 257 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 258 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 25 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
300 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 127 | 42.3% | |
| ❤ | 98 | 32.7% | |
| 🙏 | 55 | 18.3% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 2.33% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 1.33% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.00% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.667% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.667% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.333% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.333% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 300reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2024 to 2 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Уже месяц об этом думаю…соскучилась и руки просят делать… Наверно, пора уже вернуться, тем более, если повторно просят🙏🏼 Если интересно тоже, пишите @natalibutty
❤8👍5
Дорогие мои🙏🏼 Мне некогда этим каналом заниматься… Все, кого интересуют заказы по свечам/амулетам/оберегам (я беру заказы, но ожидание теперь дольше), а так же расклады карт Таро - запишите мой контакт и если что, пишите мне в лс @natalibutty
🙏21❤5🌚2🤝1
И…результат🥰 Я так рада за своих клиенток, которым помогают мои амулеты🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🫶🏼
❤17👍4🔥3
🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 По вопросам в лс @natalibutty
👍17❤4
В этом месяце цена диагностики по картам Таро так же 1700₽ на один запрос👌🏼 Напоминаю, что есть и диагностика по аудио/видео звонку или по личной встрече Вопросы, подробности и запись в лс @natalibutty
👍15
Еще один Новый год🎄 Еще одна возможность начать с чистого листа! Еще и Новолуние сегодня! Разве это не знак?😉 Поздравляю Вас с Китайским Новым годом🎄 Пусть все мечты сбываются, желания исполняются, здоровья, гармонии, удачи и любви нам всем🙏 Будьте счастливы, друзья🫶
❤22🥰3👍1
@natalibutty
👍9❤2👌1
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍7❤2🤝1
Как я рада, что мой наставник и учитель Татьяна это сказала!👏🏻🙏🏼💚 Вы всё еще верите в силу свечей с маркетплейсов?))) Пойду еще повышаться на ее курс🙏🏼🫶🏼
❤12👍4🤝2
Приветствую Вас и поздравляю с Колядой😊 Сегодня как Новый год, поэтому загадайте желание, стройте планы на ближайший год и проведите день - как самый настоящий праздник🫶🏼 Обнимаем🥰
👍15❤12
🥰сделали Диме свечу!
👍29❤7🔥4
#отзывы@magic_NB 🙏🏼🤍
👍13❤6👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @magic_NB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Магия внутри нас✨” (@magic_NB), 257 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magic_NB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.