Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖆'𝖘 𝖘𝖍𝖔𝖕

Channel

𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖆'𝖘 𝖘𝖍𝖔𝖕

@magentasshop

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

233subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002141775069
TypeChannel
Username@magentasshop
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/magentasshop

Previous handles

@magentasshop was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@magentasshop
held 8 August 20268 August 2026

Growth

2338 Aug 2026, 13:30 — 233 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 02:51 — 233 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:309 Aug 2026, 02:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 232–234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 02:51233no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:30233first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 26 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

54 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2546.3%
custom 53638247629319276381222.2%
💘916.7%
59.26%
❤‍🔥35.56%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 28 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Apr 2026, 15:53 UTC100 viewsread 8 August 2026

на данный момент у меня онли лайф тгк @aasm1vv , если вдруг кому-то интересно

28 Apr 2026, 15:53 UTC102 viewsread 8 August 2026

всем привет! напоминаю, что я давно (где-то то год назад) уже бросила создание украшений и их продажу!! вы можете отписаться от этого тгк, потому что я не планирую сюда постить что-либо 🙏

28 Apr 2026, 15:52 UTC102 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! здравствуйте! о вас не духу не слуху, вы бросили заниматься рукоделием? ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

3 Nov 2025, 16:18 UTC296 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Забрала бусинки очень классные, мне понравились спасибо за такой наборчик

❤‍🔥3custom 53638247629319276383💘1

2 Nov 2025, 14:48 UTCviews —

𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖆'𝖘 𝖘𝖍𝖔𝖕 pinned «life tgk там я намного активнее,если вдруг этот тгк удалю»

2 Nov 2025, 14:42 UTC286 viewsread 8 August 2026

life tgk там я намного активнее,если вдруг этот тгк удалю

26 Oct 2025, 09:34 UTC357 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

мне очень приятно слышать, что кому-то и вправду было интересно смотреть за моим творчеством 🙏🙏❤️

10

26 Oct 2025, 09:34 UTC351 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

🧸 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Очень жаль! Ваши украшения были самыми красивыми и аккуратными из всех, что я видела Постоянно откладывала покупку у вас, а сейчас очень жалеююю что так и не успела что то купить Удачи в новых начинаниях, интересно было наблюдать за вашим творчеством 💗 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

9

26 Oct 2025, 09:12 UTC281 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

думаю мне это перестало нравится, уже не так интересно делать украшения, каждый раз что то придумывать. И плюс из за нагрузки на доп. занятиях в школе и вне школы, просто не хватает времени сесть и уделить хотя бы час на украшения. Да и уже не окупается ничего, людям просто неинтересно на моем канале, отписок много, тк я уходила на месяц, потому что ждала новые материалы.. в общем, просто в моих глазах это перестало

custom 53638247629319276387

26 Oct 2025, 09:10 UTC258 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

🪂 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! А почему вы закрываете канал?? 😭😭 ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

1

26 Oct 2025, 09:10 UTC257 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

🦋 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! почему закрываетесь??(( ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

1

26 Oct 2025, 06:06 UTC250 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

если есть вопросы, напишите в анонку, сразу для всех отвечу http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=Xbw6oYXTiQqTzHN

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @magentasshop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖊𝖓𝖙𝖆'𝖘 𝖘𝖍𝖔𝖕” (@magentasshop), 233 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magentasshop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.