Me diga aquí comentários... está bien o está errada...????!?!?!?!?!
Signed Gustav

Channel
@magargentina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
677subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001274311223 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @magargentina |
| Created | 6 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/magargentina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 677 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 679 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 679 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 294 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Me diga aquí comentários... está bien o está errada...????!?!?!?!?!
Signed Gustav
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Victoria
El médico polaco Eugene Lazowski rescató a 8.000 judíos durante el Holocausto mediante la administración de inyecciones de células de tifus inactivas. Esta intervención permitió que los individuos resultaran positivos en las pruebas de tifus a pesar de estar sanos. Las autoridades alemanas, temerosas de la alta contagiosidad de la enfermedad, se negaron a deportarlos a campos de concentración. https://t.me/+SPau9gYH…
Signed Soy yo
El aumento desorbitado del patrimonio neto de Obama después de asumir el cargo no es una coincidencia; expone la profunda corrupción de un sistema que enriquece a los allegados a expensas del público. Ariel
Los hospitales fueron OBLIGADOS a administrar a los pacientes grandes dosis del tóxico Remdesivir en lugar de la IVERMECTINA, que es segura y económica, a pesar de que Fauci SABÍA desde el principio que la Ivermectina era efectiva. ¿Por qué? Porque la Ivermectina habría terminado la "emergencia", detenido la máquina de dinero de las vacunas y expuesto todo el fraude. Ellos intencionalmente asesinaron a innumerables…
El físico Lester Hendershot creó generadores sin una fuente de energía visible, y fue inmediatamente acusado de charlatanería Lester tuvo en cuenta la reacción del público y, en 1960, además de dos nuevos generadores, produjo 56 páginas de documentación explicando a los humanitarios que la Tierra es un imán gigante, capaz de proporcionar a la humanidad cientos de miles de millones de voltios cada día Después de la…
📊🏦Las consultoras que releva el BCRA proyectaron una inflación de 2% para julio y de 1,8% para agosto: para todo 2026 esperan 29,8% y para los próximos 12 meses, 21,8%. 📊Camino esperado para los próximos meses 🔹 Septiembre: 1,8% 🔹 Octubre: 1,7% 🔹 Noviembre: 1,6% 🔹 Diciembre: 1,8% 📊Otras variables 🔹PBI 2026: +2,7%. Estiman que en el segundo trimestre habría caído 0,4%. 🔹Dólar: $1652 para fin de año. 🔹Desempleo: baja…
🔺 PROYECTO LOOKING GLASS: LA VENTANA SECRETA DEL EJÉRCITO HACIA EL FUTURO. Oculta en los niveles más clasificados del ejército estadounidense, específicamente en el complejo de Cheyenne Mountain, existe una tecnología tan avanzada que DESAFÍA las leyes de la física convencional. ESTE ES EL PROYECTO LOOKING GLASS. Utilizando un dispositivo que emplea tecnología de "portal estelar" y campos electromagnéticos de alt…
🔺 LOS ARCHIVOS SECRETOS DEL VATICANO — EL CRONOVISOR Y LA HISTORIA OCULTA DE LA HUMANIDAD. Debajo del Vaticano se encuentran 85 kilómetros de estanterías, que contienen documentos y artefactos que datan de miles de años. Estos son los Archivos Secretos del Vaticano. Si bien al público se le dice que es simplemente un repositorio histórico, denunciantes han revelado que contiene la verdadera historia de la humani…
Generador de electricidad de movimiento perpetuo casero que utiliza imanes. Más de 100 personas en los últimos 200 años han vendido patentes que utilizan imanes de manera similar, lamentablemente, se han suicidado o han sido "víctimas" como la "Princesa Diana" debido a tales inventos. - Ron Wilson
⚡️⚡️A menudo, no se nos enseña sobre este tema: pero somos seres eléctricos (por eso, cuando perdemos el conocimiento, nos dan una descarga para revivirnos). Aquí hay un ejemplo sencillo ❤️ Cuando somos niños, tenemos agua perfectamente estructurada en nuestro cuerpo, lo que permite generar electricidad. El cobre, el agua y el carbono producen una batería (similar a las lámparas de arco de carbono). A medida que env…
🇦🇷 MAGArg🇦🇷®️️️ pinned «PROTOCOLO 01: EL ARQUITECTO DE LA SUPERFICIE (LUCES ROJAS DE 660 nm) Su piel y los tejidos superficiales están constantemente expuestos a la oxidación ambiental. Sin una intervención celular específica, la regeneración superficial se ralentiza significativamente…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @magargentina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇦🇷 MAGArg🇦🇷®️️️” (@magargentina), 677 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magargentina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.