Channel
@madhusudan_iit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,095subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001803757827 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @madhusudan_iit |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/madhusudan_iit |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 5,095 | -12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 5,107 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 5,115 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 5,116 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
60 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 73.3% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 11.7% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 25 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.ndtv.com/tech/venezuela-earthquake-disaster-alert-google-android-safety-smartphone-technology-11685416#google_vignette A very good example that can be used in Disaster Management, S&T, and even in Essay paper.
👍6
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1😢1
It's a blessing in disguise for the students. You should plan your next move in peace.
❤1
✅ UPSC IFoS 2026 Prelims Result
👍1
NFHS-6 data... It is must for you to memorise as much as possible.
❤14🙏1
Dear Students, Agar aapko thodi si bhi ummid hai ki prelims clear ho sakta hai to aapko ab ek bhi din waste kiye bagair mains k preparation me lag jaana chahiye.. Result ko jab aana hoga aa jaayega... Agar humare favour me raha to we'll have a headstart. Aur agar prelims me nahi hua to bhi to abhi mains ki hi taiyari karni hai, we shall continue the preparation with the same momentum. But agar aapne agle 20 din re…
🙏3
Attached are the provisional answerkey. Barring one or two answers, not many answers are going to be revised by UPSC in its final answerkey. DO let me know how many are you getting? In case you're worried about your privacy you can message me personally as well.
❤3
🚨 CSAT 2026 Paper Discussion – LIVE Today at 6:15 PM 🚨 Dear Students, Today at 6:15 PM sharp, I’ll be taking a special YouTube Live session to discuss the CSAT 2026 questions asked in the exam. An important point — many questions in this year’s paper have come directly from the practice sessions and discussions we conducted before the exam. We’ll analyze those questions in detail and understand the approach behind th…
❤1
Today evening at 6:00 PM, we shall have a YT Live session to discuss CSAT 2026 paper. Which section would you like to be discussed first?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What's your feeling about CSAT paper? Last year se easy tha ya difficult?
On the face of it, the paper seems very difficult. The paper was lengthy and solving the qns required in-depth knowledge of the topic.
❤1
Dear Students, GS-1 is done now. There is no point discussing its answers now. For the next two and a half hours, revisit your CSAT strategy. Mentally decide which section you will attempt first and which section last. Determine which types of questions to leave and which to attempt. Remember not to attempt math in the last 10 minutes. Keep two or three passages for the final 10 minutes. You may revise the tables,…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @madhusudan_iit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Today evening at 6:00 PM, we shall have a YT Live session to discuss CSAT 2026 paper. Which section would you like to be discussed first?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 25 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Economy & CSAT by Madhusudan Sir” (@madhusudan_iit), 5,095 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madhusudan_iit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.