Channel
@madhuAIR436
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,353subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003729240446 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @madhuAIR436 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 16 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/madhuAIR436 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 2,353 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 2,351 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 2,349 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,120 |
| Reactions total | 84 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
301 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 240 | 79.7% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 7.64% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.664% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What Cricket Taught Me About UPSC Mains There is one lesson from my college cricket days that I carried with me into UPSC Mains. Our college class team was never the most intimidating team on paper. We had a few big hitters, a couple of very good bowlers, and several average players. We were a normal team. We didn't have extraordinary strength in every department. But we used to win. For us, strength was never th…
❤35👏5🔥2
A Madhu AIR436 '25(PSIR) pinned «Many candidates preparing for the Mains are feeling anxious. They are facing FOMO, losing confidence, doubting themselves, changing plans every day, and sometimes even losing hope. If you are going through this, remember that you are not alone. In fact, almost…»
https://www.youtube.com/live/l4kMZZSzQ2A?si=CxJLicvHcjMM8-WG
👏3❤1
File, posted without a caption
👍3
Many candidates preparing for the Mains are feeling anxious. They are facing FOMO, losing confidence, doubting themselves, changing plans every day, and sometimes even losing hope. If you are going through this, remember that you are not alone. In fact, almost every topper has experienced these emotions during Mains preparation. One thing I want to tell you is this: your Mains performance is not determined by what …
❤32👍3
10 UPSC Preparation Traps That Can Cost You Precious Years 1. Perfectionism Trap Waiting for the "perfect" plan, notes, or preparation only delays progress. Consistency beats perfection. 2. FOMO Trap Constantly chasing every new strategy, topper video, or resource destroys clarity and confidence. Stay focused on your own plan. 3. Comparison Trap Don't compare your first chapter with someone else's last chapter. Ev…
❤30👍5👏2
Serious Pro Tip for Mains Improvement in Mains marks primarily depends on following a boring, repetitive and very difficult routine. One needs to write as often as possible, ideally every day, during the period remaining before Mains, since it is reasonable to assume that everyone appearing for Mains has completed at least one reading of both GS and Optional by now. However, only writing doesn’t automatically resu…
❤12👍1👏1
No teacher, mentor, course, or AI can replace your own thinking. It doesn't matter who teaches you or which course you buy. If you are not analyzing the syllabus, studying previous years' questions (PYQs), and consistently practicing answer writing, most of that knowledge has little practical value. AI can generate excellent answers, but simply reading them will not make you a better thinker or writer. The real lea…
❤15👍3
File, posted without a caption
❤8👍5
Many students are asking what I should do for 2027 prelims considering 2026 paper experience. My 2027 UPSC Prelims Plan – If I were starting again, this is exactly what I would do. 1. Master the basics. I would read and re-read the standard books until I achieve complete conceptual clarity. My foundation should be so strong that no matter what type of paper UPSC sets, I remain in control. 2. Prepare mentally f…
❤18👏10👍6
The 2026 UPSC Prelims left many sincere aspirants confused and disappointed. Immediately after the exam, almost everyone felt the paper was lengthy, unpredictable, overly factual, and, in many ways, unfair. But after a week, life slowly returned to normal. No matter how difficult the paper is, with time, every exam gets normalized. This is neither the first such paper nor will it be the last. UPSC has done this befo…
❤51👏2
Economy.pdf
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @madhuAIR436. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,032,944 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“A Madhu AIR436 '25(PSIR)” (@madhuAIR436), 2,353 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madhuAIR436.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.