Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قناة مدارك

Channel

قناة مدارك

@madarek31

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,524subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001387303984
TypeChannel
Username@madarek31
Created15 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/madarek31

Growth

2,5172,5242,520.57 August 2026 — 2,524 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,522 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,521 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,517 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,521 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,522 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,524 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 17 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,516–2,525 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 19:422,524+2
21 Aug 2026, 10:192,522+1
18 Aug 2026, 06:222,521+4
15 Aug 2026, 00:132,517-4
11 Aug 2026, 11:312,521-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:252,522-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:462,524first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.83%
avg views ÷ 2,524 subscribers
Avg views / post
173
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held19 (9 December 202530 July 2026)
Views total345
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 03s
Average length
7m 03s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1062.5%
👍318.8%
🔥212.5%
👏16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC177 viewsread 7 August 2026

تلخيصات ثقافية7️⃣: كتاب «الثقافة في عصر العوالم الثلاثة» للمؤرخ والناقد الثقافي الأمريكي مايكل دينينغ • يرى دينينغ أن الثقافة لم تكن في (العوالم الثلاثة) مجرد انعكاس للاقتصاد أو السياسة، بل أصبحت ساحة الصراع الأساسية التي تتنافس فيها القوى الاجتماعية على تشكيل الوعي والهوية والشرعية. • المقصود بالعوالم الثلاثة: ينطلق المؤلف من فكرة أن العالم بين عامي 1945 و1989 كان منقسمًا إلى ثلاثة عوالم: العالم الأول: الرأسمالي

22 Jul 2026, 09:09 UTC331 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

وهذا عرض آخر للكتاب (فوق البيعة😊) فيه لمحات عن الكتاب لم ترد في العرض المكتوب

19 Jul 2026, 09:08 UTC384 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تلخيصات ثقافية6️⃣: عربي بين ثقافتين/ زكي نجيب محمود: • في هذا الكتاب يُعرِّفنا زكي نجيب محمود على مراحل تطوُّر تكوينه العقلي وثقافته، من خلال طرح إحدى أهم زوايا هذا التطوُّر وتفرُّده، وهي الجمع بين التعمُّق والاطلاع الكثيف والانتماء إلى الثقافة العربية، وبين اطِّلاعه وتَفاعُله مع الثقافة الغربية. فاختار المؤلِّف أولاً فكرة «المبادئ»، ومفهومها في كلتا الثقافتَين العربية والغربية، مُناقشًا فكرة التوفيق بين المفهومَ

👏1

16 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC355 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❇️ نظرات👁️ تقييمية لكتاب آدم كوبر: - رغم أن الكتاب نجح في تعرية تضخم مفهوم الثقافة الذي بات يستخدم اليوم في التبرير السياسي (مثل مقولات صراع الحضارات)، إلا أنه ذهب أبعد من اللازم في التقليل من القيمة التفسيرية لمفهوم الثقافة، وكذلك قلل من الأهمية العميقة للمعاني والرموز في تحريك السلوك البشري. - الكتاب موجه بالأساس للباحثين في الأنثروبولوجيا، والمهتمين بالدراسات الثقافية، ويناقش قضايا تفصيلية في مفهوم الثقافة، لذلك

👍2

11 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC427 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/zah_asiri/status/2075862100207869955?s=46&t=YqibExETbEv9-64PwvVioA بعض العروض المميزة لكتاب برق خلب.. والتي قد تفيد من لم يطلع على الكتاب. للدكتورة زهرة عسيري على منصة إكس وعلى مساحة فطور السبت في المنصة ذاتها وكذلك للأستاذ طارق المالكي في برنامج إذاعي كل الشكر والتقدير لهما.

👍1

7 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC467 viewsread 7 August 2026

تلخيصات ثقافية 5️⃣: كتاب "الثقافة: التفسير الأنثروبولوجي" لمؤلفه عالم الأنثروبولوجيا "آدم كوبر". قدم مراجعة نقدية وتاريخية عميقة لتطور مفهوم "الثقافة" وكيف تم استخدامه وتوظيفه في العلوم الاجتماعية. ومن النتائج الأساسية التي توصل لها المؤلف: - تضخم المفهوم وفقدانه للمعنى: حيث يرى أن مفهوم "الثقافة" أصبح فضفاضاً ومطاطياً لدرجة أنه بات يُستخدم لتفسير كل شيء، مما جعله في الواقع لا يفسر أي شيء بدقة. - الحتمية الثقافي

6 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC391 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

خطاب مصالحه مع القراء الكرام 😊 أيها القراء الكرام أعتذر لتأخري عن متابعة السلسلة والتدوين عموماً وبإذن نعاود استئناف سلسلة التعريف بكتب الثقافة، حتى ننهيها، ثم نستمر في التدوين بشكل أكثر استمرارية وسلاسة. بإذن الله تعالى.

7

26 Apr 2026, 15:42 UTC869 viewsread 7 August 2026

تلخيصات ثقافية: 4️⃣: كتاب: مفهوم الثقافة في العلوم الاجتماعية/ دنيس كوش: • في الفرق بين الثقافة والحضارة: كل ما يتعلق بالأصيل ويساهم في الإغناء الفكري والروحي هو من مجال الثقافة، وعلى النقيض من ذلك، كل ما لا يعدو مظهراً براقاً ورهافة وتهذيباً سطحياً هو من مجال الحضارة. • الثقافة ارتبطت أكثر فأكثر بمفهوم ((الأمة))، فهي تتصل بروح الشعب وعبقريته، والأمة الثقافية تسبق الأمة السياسية وتدعو إليها. إن الثقافة تبدو على أ

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @madarek31. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Emad Rashad Osman
@emadrashadosman · 53,515
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
تشويقات قرآنية
@tashweeqatquran · 44,719
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة مدارك” (@madarek31), 2,524 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madarek31.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.