Channel
@madam_wool
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,098subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001875103691 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @madam_wool |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/madam_wool |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 3,098 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 3,101 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 3,103 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 3,102 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 3,100 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 3,102 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 3,102 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 11 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
750 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 308 | 41.1% | |
| 👍 | 172 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 107 | 14.3% | |
| 😁 | 62 | 8.27% | |
| 👏 | 57 | 7.60% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 2.93% | |
| 🙏 | 17 | 2.27% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.4% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.267% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 750reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2026 to 20 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Доброе утро, друзья! На сайте появилась небольшая статья "10 советов начинающим вязать перчатки". Сейчас, когда многие заняты такими приятными летними делами, как сады-огороды-отпуска, может быть она не особенно актуальна, но ближе к зиме вам ведь захочется связать пару перчаток, тогда добро пожаловать за вдохновением😊 https://madam-wool.ru/page142427466.html
❤111👍46🥰5👏4
Случаются в моем вязально-перчаточном процессе и носки. На этот раз самые обыкновенные, мужские. Ничего оригинального, резинка 3х1 на паголенке и по верху стопы, пятка-подкова, ленточный мысок, закрытие трикотажным швом - сплошная классика. Секционной пряжей сейчас тоже никого не удивишь, но как же приятно ее вязать - не скучно и быстро. Только хочешь бросить, а там следующий цвет (ну вот довяжу его и тогда уже отло…
👍57❤27🔥21🥰3👏2💯2
Сегодня пост из рубрики "Веселые картинки". Нашла вот такое фото😂 Парочка хранится в Национальном музее Финляндии. Перчатки связаны вручную из шерсти. В описании к экспонату поясняется, что надевались эти штуковины в выходные дни при походах в церковь. А эти чудные кисточки на кончиках пальцев должны были указывать на праздничность (читай - праздность) одежды, вроде как "наши ручки сегодня не для работы"💃🏻💃🏻💃🏻 Хоро…
😁62👍22❤12🔥11🥰1
Друзья, в связи с тем, что информация в телеграм становится все менее доступной, возник вопрос о переносе нашего уютного чата на другую площадку. Безумно жаль контента - столько фото ваших прекрасных работ, технических моментов, вопросов и ответов останутся здесь. Но в наших силах перенести хотя бы часть на новое место жительства, ну или просто начать все заново. В ВК я создала канал и открытый чат, которые по функц…
❤52👍16🙏3
Со вчерашнего дня моему телеграму что-то совсем нехорошо. На случай если однажды утром вдруг не смогу сюда зайти, вот ссылка на Мах https://max.ru/join/QRhMNSAWbTj1aU1I4tLmx0Dv35XWshx-_dN2fR47C9I В спешном порядке попыталась создать канал, загрузила несколько последних постов. Комментарии под ними оставлять нельзя, но можно поставить сердечки, чтобы я знала, что там есть кто-то живой😂 В будущем наверное можно будет…
❤45🙏14😱3
Такие нежные, деликатные работы подобрались для финальной части! Кашемиру всегда есть что сказать❤️ 1-3) Виктория Демидова @Devik Кашемир 2/26 в 3 сложения, спицы 2,25. Плотность 36 петель, обхват 17,5 см, размер 3. 4-6) Ирина Афромеева https://vk.ru/club221252717 Пряжа Filcom. art. Talamone 40%кашемир, 60% меринос, 750м/100г, спицы 2,25мм в одну нить. Обхват 18 см, размер 3. 7-9) Ирина https://vk.ru/id8323898…
🔥67❤16👏16👍11🥰2
Пока я тут думаю, из чего связать мужу носки, предлагаю посмотреть еще одну серию работ нашей тестовой супер-группы: 1-2) Эльвира Петрова @elvirafaat Пряжа - кашемир, 1300м в 100г в две нити, спицы 2,25, вес 42 г. Плотность 34 петли, обхват 19 см, размер 3. 3-5) Наталья Иванова @Olegovna_Sun Пряжа Zegna Baruffa суперджилонг 1500м в 100г в три сложения, спицы 2,25. Плотность 34 петли, обхват 21 см, размер 4. Зак…
❤45👏35👍20🥰11🔥8
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @madam_wool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 797,584 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@madam_wool named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Madam Wool” (@madam_wool), 3,098 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madam_wool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.