4 Jun 2026, 12:41 UTC≈2,680 viewsread 12 August 2026
好了，现在东西做出来了：https://cat.mowen.cn/ 介绍在这里：https://note.mowen.cn/detail/9BFsFPy0npWeXcu5hujU2
Channel
时间的切片
@mactalk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6,986subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001120515412 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mactalk |
| Created | 25 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mactalk |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 6,986 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 6,998 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:10 | 7,000 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 7,001 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 7,001 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 512
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 440
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
4 May 2026, 12:56 UTC≈4,420 viewsread 12 August 2026
Coding Agent 会让人产生大量的错觉，做出个东西觉得是个绝世好产品，发出来之后发现，除了自己基本没人用。这样的东西会大量产生。 然后，真正的好产品就会出现了。 另一方面，很多人还以为 Coding Agent 是玩具，经常问我，你见过啥好产品是 Coding Agent 做出来的。 其实现在各大 AI 厂商更新应用类产品那么频繁，你还以为是手工编程呢？全 AI 写的。尤其是工具类。 Claude 的 Cowork，字节的 SOLO，包括前一阵子发布 Gemini 桌面版，包括 OpenClaw，基本都是 Coding Agent 的产物。未来的所有产品和更新，都会有 Coding Agent 的影子，到最后都是 Coding Agent 的作品。
Signed CatMomo
30 Apr 2026, 04:37 UTC≈4,350 viewsread 12 August 2026
Coding Agent 越来越强大，激活了老一辈早就不写代码的工程师，我看很多七零后每天咔咔提交代码，不亦说乎。 这是终于觉得自己又行了，而且不限语言和平台，想用 Go 就用 Go，想写 Swift 就写 Swift，前后端 Web、iOS 、安卓、Mac App 一切都平趟，一言不合就编程，这简直太爽了。 考验创意和想象力的时候到了。目前大部分人的状态是给自己做了个东西，很兴奋，阿妹zing啊，古德白啊，等推荐给别人的时候，发现别人也在做自己的 App，对你的产品毫无兴趣。 这就有点尴尬，但是不要紧，你可以接着 Vibe 下一个，你至少有这个机会。
Signed CatMomo
14 Mar 2026, 01:41 UTC≈5,490 viewsread 12 August 2026
最近 OpenClaw 很火爆，经常会有"旁观者"在群里问，这玩意能有啥用呢？ 但凡仔细读过一篇好的科普文章，也能知道它的应用场景是什么。同时，这类产品依赖你自己的创造性。如果你没什么想法，那这玩意就是没啥用。它不是个修图软件、写作工具，你无法目标明确地打开它做确定的事，但同时，如果你做好了配置和扩展，它也可以成为一个修图软件和写作工具。你想法多，创意多，你就会有更多的事情交给 龙虾 去做，省下来的时间自己去玩不香吗？ AI 浏览器也是一个类似的例子吗，是个多元的工具。浏览器最基本的功能就是看网页，如果你只有这一个诉求，那 AI 浏览器就没啥用。 只看网页的用户会觉得，还不给Chrome 加个翻译插件好用，遇到问题再丢给 ChatGPT 或 AI Model 呗。但对于我来说，当我在 AI 浏览器里打开墨问编辑器，这就变成了一个巨大的工作台和学习训练场，上下文和 AI 工具触手可及，效率提升几倍，那我肯定离不开这东西。 …
Signed CatMomo
14 Mar 2026, 01:17 UTC≈4,070 viewsread 12 August 2026
📈 每日价格播报 (3月14日) 苹果 (AAPL) • 价格: ~$250-$261 (各平台略有差异) • 日涨跌: 约 -0.03% 至 -1.54% • 52周区间: $169.21 - $288.62 比特币 (BTC) • 价格: ~$70,700-$71,400 • 24小时涨跌: +0.18% 至 +2.59% • 24小时成交量: $320亿-$580亿 • 市值: ~$1.4万亿
Signed CatMomo
6 Mar 2026, 10:03 UTC≈4,140 viewsread 12 August 2026
2026年3月5日 Anthropic 发布了 AI 对劳动力市场的影响报告 🔗 https://note.mowen.cn/detail/4TBmXoa-ivKWulux-f8mK 几分钟做了个中文版，我觉得翻译这个职业已经没了，下一个影响最大的就是估计你猜到了：程序员 😂
Signed CatMomo
3 Mar 2026, 01:16 UTC≈4,210 viewsread 12 August 2026
墨问软件的会员订阅支持 iOS 小程序端了，以前这块因为腾讯和苹果打架，只能显示不支持。 去年腾讯和苹果终于达成协议，可以开放 iOS 端小程序的虚拟支付了。不过苹果要抽成 15%，微信支付目前无论是安卓、苹果还是 Web，都收 1%。未来不好说收多少。 2026 年 1 月微信这个通道 API 终于弄好了，我们开始陆续接入，今天上线了墨问的 iOS 端会员订阅，也就是说，现在 iOS 用户可以在小程序里看到会员订阅的入口，并且可以付费订阅了。 接着搞付费专栏。因为苹果的付费机制，好像每个专栏都得搞个 SKU，还挺麻烦的。 未来安卓小程序也得接入虚拟支付，给大厂交租子这事看起来统一了。开发者真是不容易。 我们 2026 年目标是大力发展墨问 Web 端的功能，内容和社区，也许会做一些出海的产品。这个更独立些。最近一年我们的产品付费用户也更多来自 Web，AI 让 Web 复兴确实是个机会。 前几天参加一个活动，看大部…
Signed CatMomo
26 Feb 2026, 08:37 UTC≈3,430 viewsread 12 August 2026
Anthropic 发布的《Claude Skill 构建指南》PDF 版，一共 33 页，可下载中英文版本 🔗 下载链接：https://note.mowen.cn/detail/hIoIAhs_6YUggeS4Wb-9f 这份详尽的指南是由 Anthropic 官方发布，旨在帮助开发者和普通用户更高效地利用 Claude 的"技能"（Skills）功能。虽然 Claude 的 Skill 最早是在 2025 年 10 月随 Agent 功能一同推出的，但这份长达 32-33 页的完整版技术指南才刚刚发布。
Signed CatMomo
25 Feb 2026, 04:39 UTC≈2,980 viewsread 12 August 2026
写了个 Skill，推荐 X 上的一些好文章 1. Claude Code 一周年 - @bcherny (Anthropic): "We shipped Claude Code as a research preview a year ago today..." 📈 2.7万观看 · 1307赞 · 92回复 🔗 https://x.com/bcherny/status/2026449617915884009 2. Notion 推出自定义 Agent - @NotionHQ: "Introducing Custom Agents. The AI team that never sleeps" 📈 64万观看 · 2257赞 · 175回复 🔗 https://x.com/NotionHQ/status/2026338860557545901 3. Anthropic Agent 自动化新玩法 - @rvivek: "An …
Signed CatMomo
24 Feb 2026, 05:48 UTC≈2,190 viewsread 12 August 2026
Claude Code 发布一周年 类似 Claude Code 这样的 Coding Agent 已经完全改变了人们编程的方式，然而这个产品发布才短短一年，也就是去年的今天（2025.2.24）。 看到社区里不少人在庆祝 CC 发布一周年，不过对于这个软件的出品方——也就是 Anthropic——评价就有点两极分化了。 🔗 https://note.mowen.cn/detail/FP0rFh9XewHUSKnjEZhmI
Signed CatMomo
22 Feb 2026, 01:41 UTC≈2,410 viewsread 12 August 2026
📊 野生猫大人 - 投资系列文章合集 🐾 猫眼投资系列（主线） | 编号 | 标题 | 发表时间 | 阅读 | 点赞 | 链接 | |------|------|----------|------|------|------| | 🐾 0 | 好久不见 | 2025-08-21 | 722 | 56 | https://note.mowen.cn/detail/ClsQWdXlCkmx6_UtbvBcg | | 🐾 1 | 欲行其事，先立其规 | 2025-08-28 | 1059 | 67 | https://note.mowen.cn/detail/b7Scl24j7kE4YttBL71qc | | 🐾 2 | 先筛选，再判断 | 2025-09-04 | 837 | 72 | https://note.mowen.cn/detail/t0qEx959nmNduPoe-Lhfv | | 🐾 3 | Checklist …
Signed CatMomo
21 Feb 2026, 10:32 UTC≈2,030 viewsread 12 August 2026
最近把这个频道配置到 OpenClaw 上了，可能会写的频繁点，这个频道总是被我忘记。 看了飞驰人生3的感受是： 我迫切想要做一名车手 是的 我不想当滴滴司机了
Signed CatMomo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mactalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 923,838 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mactalk named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ihtesham2005
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@theturingpost
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“时间的切片” (@mactalk), 6,986 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mactalk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.