Channel
@mablive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,339subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001567422896 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mablive |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mablive |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 1,339 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 1,340 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 1,340 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кампания Recycle Me для Coca-Cola была создана WPP Open X / Ogilvy New York, получила Grand Prix Cannes Lions 2024 в Print & Publishing и связана с глобальной программой Coca-Cola по сбору и переработке упаковки к 2030 году. Coca-Cola сделала то, что большинство брендов боится делать: буквально «разрушила» свой логотип. В кампании Recycle Me бренд взял использованные банки, сплющил их и превратил деформированный ло…
🐁 IKEA Canada запустила кампанию Assemble the World к чемпионату мира 2026 года. И вместо того чтобы просто нарисовать мяч, футболиста и написать «болеем вместе», бренд сделал ход намного умнее. IKEA собрала флаги 18 стран-участниц из своих же товаров: ковров, подушек, ламп, посуды, мебели и мягких игрушек. То есть бренд не пытался казаться футбольным. Он взял большой инфоповод и перевел его на свой язык — язык до…
💚😊 Кажется, эра стерильного минимализма в брендинге наконец-то начинает сдавать позиции. Последние годы многие бренды шли по одному пути: упростить логотип, убрать детали, выровнять форму, сделать «чище», «современнее», «универсальнее». 👍 Звучит логично. Но на практике часто получалось одно и то же: бренды становились аккуратными, но безликими. И вот на этом фоне мы снова видим возвращение маскотов, персонажей и ж…
❤1
🐁 Как продавать больше, предлагая меньше? Предприниматель часто думает так: «Чем больше вариантов я покажу клиенту, тем выше шанс, что он что-то купит». Но на практике часто происходит наоборот. В маркетинге это называется парадоксом выбора (эффект Барри Шварца). Нам кажется, что широкий выбор привлекает клиентов. Но на деле происходит обратное: мозг человека испытывает когнитивную перегрузку. Чем больше вариантов,…
🐁👍 В чём разница между ключевой идеей и позиционированием (Почему?) Ключевая идея бренда → Зачем бренд существует (Как?) Позиционирование → Как бренд должен занять место в голове аудитории (Что?) Продукт → Через что бренд это доказывает 👍 Примеры: Apple не говорил: Мы делаем компьютеры с хорошими характеристиками. Он говорил: Think Different / Думай иначе. То есть Apple продавал не устройство, а способ виде…
❤1
Глобальный ребрендинг KFC от агентства JKR Совместно с JKR бренд переосмыслил свою визуальную систему, объединив шесть ключевых фирменных активов в цельную айдентику. Параллельно KFC обновил меню, запустил новые ресторанные форматы и усилил глобальную стратегию без отказа от собственного наследия. Новая айдентика KFC строится на концепции «Bucketverse», которая превращает легендарное красно-белое ведро и наследие б…
❤1
Baikal Lobridge В начале 2026 года один из ключевых игроков и пионеров российского рынка Government Relations и Public Affairs Концепция визуальной айдентики Baikal Lobridge, строится на метафоре устойчивого моста и направленного движения, где динамичные графические линии символизируют процесс выстраивания связей и преодоления коммуникационных барьеров между бизнесом и государством. Строгая геометрическая сетка и с…
❤1😎1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @mablive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 236,950 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Рукастый Арт-директор ©Байрам” (@mablive), 1,339 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mablive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.