Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الأخصائي النفسي: محمد الأسطى

Channel

الأخصائي النفسي: محمد الأسطى

@maalastaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,141subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001598700007
TypeChannel
Username@maalastaa
CreatedBetween 1 September 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/maalastaa

Growth

4,1414,1654,1536 August 2026 — 4,165 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,165 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,161 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,156 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,152 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,154 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,148 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,141 subscribers6 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,137–4,169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 20:434,141-7
24 Aug 2026, 03:544,148-6
20 Aug 2026, 02:334,154+2
16 Aug 2026, 20:244,152-4
13 Aug 2026, 01:264,156-5
9 Aug 2026, 20:214,161-4
6 Aug 2026, 16:404,165no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:184,165first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.79%
avg views ÷ 4,141 subscribers
Avg views / post
364
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total728
Reactions total21
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

223 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17779.4%
👍4520.2%
😢10.448%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 223reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maalastaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 April 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC326 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ليست كل المشاعر تحتاج إلى إصلاح... بعضها تحتاج فقط إلى أن نفهمها، ونتعلم كيف نعيش معها دون أن تقود حياتنا.

8

2 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC402 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

الذكاء الاصطناعي أصبح داخل غرفة العلاج... حتى لو لم تستخدمه أنت. ــــــــــــــــــــــــــ وفقًا للجمعية الأمريكية لعلم النفس (APA)، أفاد 77% من الأخصائيين النفسيين أن مرضاهم يستخدمون أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي، وأكثر من ثلثهم قالوا إن بعض المرضى يتعاملون معها كمصدر إضافي للدعم النفسي. لذلك توصي APA بأن يسأل المعالج مرضاه بشكل مباشر: هل تستخدم أي أدوات ذكاء اصطناعي لدعمك النفسي؟ ليس بهدف المنع، بل لفهم: - ما الذي يح

9👍4

12 Jul 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,030 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2076177736326951383

👍4

26 Jun 2026, 19:59 UTC≈1,420 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://substack.com/@maalasta/note/c-283325616?r=4khmu9

1

13 Jun 2026, 09:10 UTC≈1,530 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/1759245878869557707

4👍1

10 Jun 2026, 05:27 UTC≈1,580 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

في تشريح العزلة: حين يلتقي قلق الوجود بأسر الموروث ــــــــــــــــــــــــــ ​يبدأ الأمر دائماً بنوع من الحيرة الصامتة؛ تلك اللحظة المباغتة التي يتوقف فيها ضجيج الحياة اليومية، فيجد الإنسان نفسه وحيداً أمام عري كينونته. في تلك العتمة الاسترجاعية، يرتطم الوعي بأسئلته العتيقة والمؤجلة: قلق الفناء، عبء الحرية، والبحث المضني عن معنى يملأ فراغ الوجود. بيد أن هذه المواجهة السيكولوجية، التي تبدو في ظاهرها تجربة فردية محضة

8

8 Jun 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,080 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

في تشريح الأزمة الوجودية: من استقالة الوعي إلى استعادة الكينونة ــــــــــــــــــــــــــ ​إن حلول الأزمة النفسية في الذات الإنسانية ليس مجرد اضطراب موضعي في المزاج، بل هو – في تقديرنا البنيوي والوجودي – "مأزق في الفهم" و"مواجهة حادة مع حقائق الوجود المخرومة"؛ حيث يصطدم الإنسان فجأة بحقائق يالوم الأربع: (الموت، والحرية ومسؤوليتها، والعزلة الوجودية، وغياب المعنى الجاهز). ​وقت الأزمة، يقع العقل في فخ التشتت والاستقال

9

7 Jun 2026, 08:11 UTC≈2,200 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

في نقد البنية التفاعلية: العلاقة العلاجية كفضاء معرفي وإنساني آمن ــــــــــــــــــــــــــ ​في الممارسة العيادية النفسية، نقع كثيراً في فخ ميكانيكية العلاج؛ إذ يُظن خطأً أن الشفاء هو نتاج حتمي لتطبيق "استراتيجيات معرفية وسلوكية معزولة". لكن التدقيق البنيوي في شروط التغيير النفسي يثبت أن العلاقة العلاجية ليست مجرد وسيلة أو حامل خارجي للعلاج، بل هي بنية العلاج ذاته؛ إنها تلك المساحة الآمنة التي تعيد صياغة الوعي بالذا

8😢1

11 May 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,470 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

مساء الخير يا أصدقاء في داخل الإنسان ميلٌ خفي إلى تأجيل ما يعلم يقينًا أنه نافع له… ليس جهلًا، بل مفارقة نفسية عميقة: أن تعرف الطريق… ولا تسلكه. نحن لا نؤجّل لأننا لا نملك الوقت، بل لأن في داخلنا مقاومة دقيقة لكل ما يتطلب انضباطًا. كأن النفس—بطبيعتها—تميل إلى الراحة القريبة، حتى لو كان ثمنها قلقًا بعيد المدى. ولو تأملنا هذه الظاهرة بعين تحليلية سنجد أن التسويف ليس مجرد عادة سيئة، بل محاولة لتجنّب شعور أعمق: الخوف

34👍6

9 May 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,360 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/maalasta/p/5fa?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4khmu9

1

8 May 2026, 20:45 UTC≈3,470 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

في وقت أصبح فيه المحتوى سطحيًا وسريع الاستهلاك، يظهر تطبيق Substack كمساحة مختلفة تمامًا… مساحة تُعيد للكتابة قيمتها، وللفكرة عمقها. سبستاك ليس مجرد منصة نشر… هو بيئة فكرية كاملة: - تكتب ما تؤمن به، لا ما يطلبه الترند - تبني جمهورًا حقيقيًا مهتمًا بما تقول، لا مجرد أرقام - تتحكم في محتواك وعلاقتك مع المتابعين بدون وسيط ما يميّزه فعلًا: أن العلاقة بين الكاتب والقارئ هنا “علاقة مباشرة”، أشبه بجلسة صادقة… بدون تشويش ا

9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maalastaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 242,382 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الأخصائي النفسي: محمد الأسطى” (@maalastaa), 4,141 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maalastaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.