I guess the finals were not rigged
โค6

Channel
@m7bets
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
5,032subscribers
-151 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001244243509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @m7bets |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/m7bets |
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 5,032 | -12 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 5,044 | -22 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 5,066 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 5,074 | -30 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 5,104 | -12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:11 | 5,116 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 5,119 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 5,130 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 5,133 | -18 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 5,151 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 5,156 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:39 | 5,163 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 5,164 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 5,170 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 5,183 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 5,183 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
64 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 51 | 79.7% | |
| ๐ฅ | 4 | 6.25% | |
| ๐ซก | 4 | 6.25% | |
| ๐ณ | 2 | 3.13% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 3.13% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I guess the finals were not rigged
โค6
๐FREE BET OF THE DAY ๐World Cup Final โฝ Spain ๐ช๐ธ vs Argentina ๐ฆ๐ท ๐Over 2.0 Goals (Asian Total) ๐Odds: 1.67 Finals are often tactical, but with the attacking talent on both sides, we believe two goals is a very achievable line. Asian Total Rules: โ 3+ Goals = WIN ๐ฐ Exactly 2 Goals = Stake Refunded Good luck to everyone following!
โค4
๐จ MATCHDAY IS HERE ๐จ ๐ FIFA World Cup Final Tonight, everything is on the line. โฝ Spain๐ช๐ธ vs Argentina๐ฆ๐ท Weโve spent hours breaking down the matchup, statistics, tactical trends, and betting markets to find the best value. Stay ready, notifications on, and donโt place any bets until the official picks are released. Letโs finish this World Cup with a big result. ๐ฐ๐
โค7๐ฅ1
๐ WORLD CUP FINAL PICK โฝ France ๐ซ๐ท vs England ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ ๐ France to Win (90' + Stoppage Time) ๐ Odds: 1.83 It all comes down to this. We're backing France to come in 3rd place by getting the job done inside 90 minutes. France have the experience, quality, and match-winners to rise to the occasion when it matters most. A strong price on one of the tournament favorites. Let's finish this World Cup with a winner. ๐ฐ
โค7
๐
But genuinely how tf did argetina do that
โค3๐ณ2
I mean atleast free bet won
๐ซก1
How tf
๐1
๐FREE BET OF THE DAY โฝ England ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟvs Argentina ๐ฆ๐ท ๐ Over 1.5 Goals ๐ Odds: 1.42 A World Cup semi-final where every chance matters. While these games can start cautiously, both teams have enough attacking quality to produce goals. โฝ We only need 2 goals in the match to cash this pick. A simple selection with solid value. Good luck to everyone following! ๐
โค4
Did not see that from them
But hats off to spain
๐ซก2
Wtf was this game
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @m7bets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โM7๐| BETTING PROJECTโ (@m7bets), 5,032 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m7bets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.