🇺🇦US Marine Raider in Afghanistan©️
custom 538661719659408784611custom 53867645311521988515custom 51975582380772645523

Channel
@m4crxw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
599subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002692598666 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @m4crxw |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/m4crxw |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 599 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 598 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 598 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (28 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,046 |
| Reactions total | 198 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
198 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5386764531152198851 | 64 | 32.3% | |
| custom 5197558238077264552 | 42 | 21.2% | |
| custom 4956666317152191570 | 32 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5224321781321442532 | 32 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5386617196594087846 | 28 | 14.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @m4crxw. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇺🇦US Marine Raider in Afghanistan©️
custom 538661719659408784611custom 53867645311521988515custom 51975582380772645523
🤩U.S. Marines in front of the burning Burgan oil fields, Kuwait, 1991.🔥 *** 🤩Морські піхотинці США на фоні палаючих нафтових полів Бурган, Кувейт, 1991-й рік.🔥
custom 522432178132144253211custom 53867645311521988513custom 53866171965940878462
🇬🇧British Forces in Helmand Province, Afghanistan 2007.🔫 ******* 🇬🇧Британські військові в провінції Гільменд, 2007-й рік, Афганістан.🔫
custom 53867645311521988516custom 49566663171521915702custom 51975582380772645522
💀Royal Australian Regiment trooper using a Colt M4 with ELCAN, M203 UBGL and PEQ-2, Iraq, 2003 period.🔫
custom 519755823807726455210custom 53866171965940878462custom 53867645311521988512
🇺🇸
custom 538676453115219885112custom 52243217813214425323custom 49566663171521915702
🇺🇸Force Recon: Inside U.S. Marine Corps Force Reconnaissance (1998)🔫
custom 51975582380772645524custom 52243217813214425322custom 53867645311521988512
🤩U.S. Marines search a compound during a drug raid in a village in the Helmand province of Afghanistan July 30, 2009.🔫 *** 🤩Американский морпіх обшукує будівлю на предмет наркотиків під час рейду, селище в провінції Гільменд, Афганістан, 30-те липня 2009-го року.🔫
custom 53866171965940878468custom 51975582380772645522custom 52243217813214425322
🏴☠️US Navy SEAL with a coffee and EGLM©️
custom 495666631715219157012custom 52243217813214425324custom 53867645311521988514
🤟
custom 53867645311521988518custom 52243217813214425323custom 49566663171521915702
☮️Декілька фотографій підствольного 40-мм гранатомета ХМ148, який використовувався під час війни у Вʼєтнамі.♠️
custom 538676453115219885110custom 52243217813214425325custom 51975582380772645522
🤩Золотий загін DEVGRU в Іраку, 2003-й рік.🇺🇦
custom 519755823807726455213custom 53866171965940878465custom 49566663171521915704
💀Polish GROM operatives in Iraq, 2003.🏴☠️ ******** 💀Оператори польського ГРОМу в Іраку, 2003-й рік.🏴☠️
custom 538676453115219885112custom 51975582380772645523custom 49566663171521915701
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @m4crxw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 640,484 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“M4 Crew” (@m4crxw), 599 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m4crxw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.