Channel
@m3fdrq
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
112subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001819699443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @m3fdrq |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/m3fdrq |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:41 | 112 | +1 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 111 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:56 | 112 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 111 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 110 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 109 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 109 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 108 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5267425987204752459 | 25 | 40.3% | |
| custom 5217689677506558409 | 21 | 33.9% | |
| custom 5233185773481637727 | 16 | 25.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сомневаюсь, что это критика. Я просто говорю как есть, да просто даже со стороны читателя на это все смотрю и вижу, насколько одинаковые работы набирают такое огромное количество лайков и просмотров. Хотя и на критику я вполне себе имею право, потому что писала снс ау и знаю, что это такое
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
Да
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
Набираем 25 реакций и иду писать
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
Как найти хорошие снс ау что мне читать(
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
Раньше, еще во времена пабликов в вк, где писали sns ау, большинство работ имело интересный сюжет, персонажи были разными, там были такие интересные истории. Сейчас все косят под одно и то же, точнее, под одного автора, который когда-то, судя по всему, случайно ввел тренд именно на таких героев
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
Я заскринила названия этих ау, показывать не буду, но там буквально «джисон капризная принцесса, а минхо его покорный мальчик», «минсоны бывшие, но...», один холоден, а другой по уши влюблен. И там везде, абсолютно везде одинаковое нытье
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
У меня сейчас буквально вся лента в этом, и я не понимаю, почему каждая ау, которая мне попадается, во-первых, абсолютно одинаковая с абсолютно одинаковыми характерами персонажей, во-вторых, почему это настолько хорошо читается
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
Если когда-то у меня будет совсем плохо с продвижением, я начну писать sns au и выкладывать их в тт
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
Ахахах, кстати, многие моменты я писала именно ночью, и у меня не получалось после этого спать, потому что боялась того, что придумала сама
custom 52674259872047524592
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
Спасибо за отзыв, мне очень приятно, что вам понравилось ❤️ Во времени вы действительно запутались, у меня с ним все точно. Видимо, где-то просто не так поняли, но в тексте все четко, я расписывала себе каждый месяц по событиям, поэтому несостыковок быть не должно. С переходом от врагов к возлюбленным сама согласна, что накосячила. Мне нужна была химия, и на момент написания работы у меня не получалось нормально все …
custom 52674259872047524592
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
Внушите мне кто-нибудь, что после просмотра сериала про одичавших девочек, ставших каннибалками, мне НЕ нужно идти и писать нечто подобное и вдохновленное этим Просто скажите что мне это не нужно
custom 52674259872047524597
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
????????? ого
custom 52674259872047524595custom 52176896775065584093custom 52331857734816377273
Signed ユリ゛mfr.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @m3fdrq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“꽃 ; lantana`.. lily” (@m3fdrq), 112 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m3fdrq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.