Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

แ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ / โฅ ๐Ÿ’’ ๏ธ” ๐–ง๐–ค๐–ซ๐–ฏ

@m1dhelpp

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

2,071subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001923372121
TypeChannel
Username@m1dhelpp
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/m1dhelpp

Growth

2,0692,0712,0709 Aug 2026, 11:02 โ€” 2,069 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 05:51 โ€” 2,071 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 11:0210 Aug 2026, 05:51
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 2,069โ€“2,071 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 05:512,071+2
9 Aug 2026, 11:022,069first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
29.3%
avg views รท 2,071 subscribers
Avg views / post
608
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (6 July 2026 โ€“ 7 August 2026)
Views total5,469
Reactions total86
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿฆ„4838.4%
๐Ÿ’˜4132.8%
๐Ÿ’…3628.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC43 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @chicagohlpPhoto

โ™ก.CอŸอŸHอŸอŸIอŸอŸCอŸอŸAอŸอŸGO : ์‚ฌ๋ž‘ ! help โค๏ธ NJ ฤฑnเคฟrะผ # ecliฯse * ๐’œdmฮนns แจข ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿณ ๐Ÿ˜œ แ˜’ โ€”โ€”โ€” ฮฑlฯ‰ฮฑys uฯ ฮฑnd downเน‹ึด

4 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC115 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

แ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ < ๆ–ฐใ— , ๐Ÿ‘› ๏ธ” #Photoset TUIDE / ๏ผŸโ€”โ€”โ€” โฅ CmโบะฒัŒ +

๐Ÿฆ„4๐Ÿ’…2๐Ÿ’˜1

26 Jul 2026, 02:51 UTC529 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

แ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ < ๆ–ฐใ— , ๐Ÿ‘› ๏ธ” #png Y2K CHROME / ๏ผŸโ€”โ€”โ€” โฅ CmโบะฒัŒ +

๐Ÿ’˜5๐Ÿฆ„5๐Ÿ’…4

26 Jul 2026, 02:08 UTC682 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

แ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ < ๆ–ฐใ— , ๐Ÿ‘› ๏ธ” #png JELLY CHROME PINK / ๏ผŸโ€”โ€”โ€” โฅ CmโบะฒัŒ +

๐Ÿ’˜5๐Ÿฆ„5๐Ÿ’…3

25 Jul 2026, 23:27 UTC474 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

แ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ < ๆ–ฐใ— , ๐Ÿ‘› ๏ธ” #png PIXEL / ๏ผŸโ€”โ€”โ€” โฅ CmโบะฒัŒ +

๐Ÿ’…3๐Ÿฆ„3๐Ÿ’˜2

25 Jul 2026, 23:08 UTC387 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

แ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ < ๆ–ฐใ— , ๐Ÿ‘› ๏ธ” #png ะšะ˜ะขะะ™ะกะšะ˜ะ• ะคะžะะะ ะ˜ / ๏ผŸโ€”โ€”โ€” โฅ CmโบะฒัŒ +

๐Ÿ’˜5๐Ÿฆ„3๐Ÿ’…2

19 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTCโ‰ˆ1,550 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

แ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ < ๆ–ฐใ— , ๐Ÿ‘› ๏ธ” #png PICTOGRAPH LOGO / ๏ผŸโ€”โ€”โ€” โฅ CmโบะฒัŒ +

๐Ÿ’…5๐Ÿ’˜4๐Ÿฆ„4

17 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC808 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

แ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ < ๆ–ฐใ— , ๐Ÿ‘› ๏ธ” #png SANRIO / ๏ผŸโ€”โ€”โ€” โฅ CmโบะฒัŒ +

๐Ÿฆ„5๐Ÿ’˜4๐Ÿ’…2

17 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC881 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

แ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ < ๆ–ฐใ— , ๐Ÿ‘› ๏ธ” #png SANRIO / ๏ผŸโ€”โ€”โ€” โฅ CmโบะฒัŒ +

๐Ÿฆ„4๐Ÿ’…3๐Ÿ’˜3

11 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC894 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

แ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ < ๆ–ฐใ— , ๐Ÿ‘› ๏ธ” #Photoset Dayoung / ๏ผŸโ€”โ€”โ€” โฅ CmโบะฒัŒ +

๐Ÿฆ„4๐Ÿ’…3๐Ÿ’˜2

Signed Cologne.

11 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC798 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

แ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ < ๆ–ฐใ— , ๐Ÿ‘› ๏ธ” #Photoset BABYMONSTER / ๏ผŸโ€”โ€”โ€” โฅ CmโบะฒัŒ +

๐Ÿ’…4๐Ÿ’˜4๐Ÿฆ„3

Signed Cologne.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @m1dhelpp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 623,967 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œแ…  ๐‘€๊ชฑโ€Œd๐—ก๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ / โฅ ๐Ÿ’’ ๏ธ” ๐–ง๐–ค๐–ซ๐–ฏโ€ (@m1dhelpp), 2,071 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m1dhelpp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.