O2?
❤15🔥2😭1
Signed LazyBones

Channel
@lzyport
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,153subscribers
+38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002092504313 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lzyport |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lzyport |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 2,153 | +6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 2,147 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 2,144 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 2,146 | +14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 2,132 | +18 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 2,114 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 2,113 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 2,116 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 2,115 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 2,115 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
257 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 132 | 51.4% | |
| 😭 | 43 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 12.5% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 4.28% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 3.89% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 2.33% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 2.33% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.778% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.389% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.389% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.389% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
O2?
❤15🔥2😭1
Signed LazyBones
Posted without readable text
🔥5❤1
更新兼容性,可能其他机子也能用了?
❤7😍2🔥1
Signed LazyBones
#ColorOS #Port #Marble ColorOS 16.0.9 | Android 16 Updated: 26/07/24 Ignore Changelog,lazy to write - Do not ask anything without reading Notes!!! ▪️ Download: OneDrive ▪️ Changelog | Notes | Credits ▪️ Support Group ▪️ Screenshots ▪️ Coffee ▪️ Fast Update Channel By @LazyBones_LZY Follow @lzyport Join @lzychat
🔥22❤3
Signed LazyBones
原来7月没更新吗
❤3
Signed LazyBones
能否用自测,我只知道marble可用
🤔5👏2
Signed LazyBones
No need to patch anything include .jar
❤20👏2🔥2🦄1
Signed LazyBones
已更新 修复锁屏唤醒延迟 还有啥忘了
❤11👏4🤔1🥰1
Signed LazyBones
OPPO 整合一加与真我系统,全球统一启用 ColorOS 2026 年 7 月,OPPO 宣布对其智能手机业务实施全面整合。一加氧 OS 与真我 realme UI 即日起停止开发,全球新机将统一搭载 ColorOS。此举旨在优化系统研发资源,强化品牌协同。整合涉及中国、印度等核心市场:一加聚焦中印两地,售后并入 OPPO 网络;真我则收缩中国业务,专注海外。7 月 1 日,真我服务账号已完成迁移至 OPPO 服务体系。此前,真我商城已于 4 月 25 日关停。 Donews 🌸 在花频道 · 茶馆水群 · 投稿通道
❤12😁3😭1
Signed LazyBones
反正该给的都给出去了 我也没东西给了
😭6❤2😢1
Signed LazyBones
无论是谁都别问我什么bug怎么修复 我一律不会再给 我很失望😁
❤9
Signed LazyBones
已更新
❤12👏1
Signed LazyBones
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lzyport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 989,426 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LazyBones | UPDATES” (@lzyport), 2,153 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lzyport.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.