Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лизовский

Channel

Лизовский

@lzwski

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,284subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001221195042
TypeChannel
Username@lzwski
Created13 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lzwski

Growth

2,2832,2852,2847 August 2026 — 2,283 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,283 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,285 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,284 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,283–2,285 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:222,284-1
13 Aug 2026, 11:242,285+2
7 Aug 2026, 05:162,283no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:092,283first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
56s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,455 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
79654.7%
😁20814.3%
😢17612.1%
🙏624.26%
👍594.05%
🔥443.02%
🫡372.54%
🎉261.79%
🥰231.58%
😭120.825%
🤯70.481%
🤔40.275%
🖕10.069%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,455reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC≈1,260 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

всё-таки я ушел в кино

58🫡15

15 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,610 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

пов: читаешь новости про то как один лысый пытается доказать, что он не лысый и обижается на тех, кто говорит, что он лысый и это вы бля вообще соя, у второго опять рвёт жопу от индуской еды и время крыс =щащаща= закончится, на третьего ставки делают, что его от ожирения через год не станет, четвертый как пропал 2 месяца назад, так всем и похуй на него, у пятых 14 июля ничего не произошло... и так далее... и так дале

😁258

6 Jul 2026, 04:59 UTC≈2,300 views108 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Читая комментарии, я порой встречаю негативные о том, что цветокор то говно. И судя по ним, могу сказать, что отработал я свои референсы на все 101%. Все цели были достигнуты. Работем, братья.

95🥰8🤔4😁1

2 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC≈2,950 views116 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎥 ВЕЛИКАЯ КИТАЙСКАЯ ИСТОРИЯ О ТОМ, КАК БРАТИШКИН В ПЕКИН ЕЗДИЛ (Полнометражка, 2026) Три дня борьбы с ютубом, что бы по итогу он все равно нам оставил 18+. Но терпение уже было напердели... ПРЕМЬЕРА

101🔥9🥰6

30 Jun 2026, 06:00 UTC≈2,810 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

седня в [kak rofls prosneca napishy]

65🔥7

15 Jun 2026, 08:34 UTC≈3,580 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

да ща-ща-ща уже скоро

👍498

26 May 2026, 16:13 UTC≈4,390 views97 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я считаю, что люди строят вокруг меня ложные образы, и это всё не правда, друзья. Алкоголь вреден для здоровья, и я не советую вступать вам на эту грязную и жидкую дорогу. Но если всё же судьба изменила ваши жизненные планы, то можно и пригубить 0.5 светленького, но главное – не вместо работы. К тому же я не пью уже два дня и не собираюсь останавливаться. Сейчас перед вами другой Богдан, а не тот, который был ранее.

76😁17🥰4

26 May 2026, 14:57 UTC≈3,140 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Плюсы Санкт-Петербурга: красивые виды Минусы: рука может судьбоносно соскользнуть и допустить падение телефона в реку Неву. Но она не глубокая, так что это тоже плюс в своем роде.

🙏60🔥8😁4😭2

20 May 2026, 12:27 UTC≈3,800 views86 reactionsread 7 August 2026

враг проник в мой компьютер и написал эту хуйню. не верьте слухам, пацыки, я всё ещё монитирую в премьере

😁766🥰4

19 May 2026, 12:58 UTC≈5,170 views124 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Также хочу отметить, что спустя пять лет я всё-таки смог перейти на новую программу для монтажа — DaVinci Resolve 🎬✨ Ощущения — атас! Но Premiere Pro я всё равно сохранил на всякие случаи внезапных затупов. Всем хорошего дня! ☀️👋

105👍10😁6🎉2🖕1

19 May 2026, 12:54 UTC≈66,000 views170 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья 👋, совсем скоро мы с вами сможем вновь увидеться на канале «Bratishkin Rofls» 📺, где вы сможете оценить по достоинству мою новую кинокартину о поездке наших русских ребят к нашим братским партнёрам в Китай! 🇨🇳🎬✨

150🔥20

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lzwski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 560,728 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

YEP
@yep_news · 183,503
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лизовский” (@lzwski), 2,284 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lzwski.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.