Channel
@lzhcb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19,221subscribers
-82 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002237706878 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lzhcb |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lzhcb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 19,221 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 19,217 | -17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 19,234 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 19,227 | -55 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 19,282 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 19,284 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 19,279 | -24 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 19,303 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 24 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
83 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 79 | 95.2% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.61% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😂擦亮眼睛 不要贪小便宜！无论个人老师还是有鸡头的都不能突然大幅度降价搞什么特价夜‼️人家恨不得价格越高越好 突然出现很有诱惑力的大幅度降价,只有两种可能 ①不做了跑路了圈一波 ②被盗号了 职业骗子在骗钱 各位狼友务必提高警惕,群里虽然不提倡约课给定金,但是包夜和上门还是往往避免不了路费之类的,不管什么乱七八糟的理由 要么不给换一个人约,要么最多给100路费‼️
❤18👌1
此次打击清算翻墙国内中转的力度前所未有，TG机场群和Twitter帖一片哀嚎，说是国内中转翻墙机场至暗时刻也不为过。如此迅速的大规模、系统性打击应该是来自高层的指示。因为国内中转机到掌控权在打击者监管方手里，要封锁可谓是易如反掌，国家层级的封锁，即使被拔线也毫无反抗之力。至于为什么这次力度这么大，原因不清楚也不需要纠结。 此次打击对所有中转机场都有影响，因为是连坐制的，一旦有一个机场通报整个ip段都会被拔，也就是说即使你的机场没通报，也一样会受到影响，因为没人可保证其他机场不会被通报。（提出ip通报连坐制的真是个天才）。同时即使都没通报，IDC为了安全也会主动清退。所以即使目前正常的中转（包括专线中转）机场也是岌岌可危的。 目前各机场也是各显神通，采取包括封端，自建DNS，更换直连协议节点，海外中转等策略。本质上这是一场回合制游戏，GFW出牌之后轮到我们出牌了而已。只希望这轮高压态势不会持续太久。 目前没有任何一家中转机场…
❤13
🟢 #望城区 #黑车 慎约 #调包不对版 #包夜做一次跑路 1.第一次是望城青青，说自己红休推荐闺蜜给狼友，狼友被骗，青青装无辜，说不是自己骗的 2.前天，狼友约望城欣欣吖，包夜做一次跑路，首先来的也不是欣欣本人，狼友没计较，但跑路了，就接受不了 第二天，欣欣又装红休说自己2天没上线，又说不是她骗的，结果对质时，欣欣发截图的时候，图6的头像，正好是之前青青推荐的那个骗钱的头像，都是望城区，正好又同一个头像，这么巧合，望城本来就那么几个老师， 两起骗钱事件，就是同一个人所为，搞一些移花接木，混淆视听
❤18👍3
🟢仙豆活动规则 1⃣️仙豆有什么用？ 1仙豆=100元口令红包 可用于出击武道公开榜在榜老师或者上榜广告商家后优惠报销返现！ 2⃣️如何使用仙豆 持有者出击消费武道群在榜老师或者广告商家后,凭7日内出击记录凭证, 联系管理卡林仙人兑换报销返现,拥有满4颗仙豆可兑换报销返现一次！（不想集齐四颗也可按50元/颗直接折现） 3⃣️如何获得仙豆 1️⃣群内每月战斗力抽奖获得!！ 2️⃣介绍老师上榜,每成功上榜一位奖励一颗仙豆！（所有人都可以参加！之前没在武道上过榜的才有效！老师介绍姐妹上榜得1仙豆可抵50榜费） 主群内发送“仙豆” 可查看所拥有仙豆数量（为防止炸号,请及时截图保存带日期的所仙豆数量截图）! 本活动有效期至2026年12月30日, 若活动结束时还有仙豆未返现使用,可直接联系管理按50元/颗折现清零！ 该活动的一切解释权归武道会管理组所有！
❤9
#黑车 #婷宝 #骗钱 😅。。。。穿越时空的爱恋 跨度两个月 不要没见人就给钱啊 之前约过的也不能给啊,精虫上脑只会上当受骗,精神小妹的话不能信的, 不敢帮买票但是敢加微信😁
❤21
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @lzhcb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,409,749 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“长沙轶事/黑车榜” (@lzhcb), 19,221 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lzhcb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.