Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for перекатип̶о̶л̶я̶

Channel

перекатип̶о̶л̶я̶

@lveysiqq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

184subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001679201705
TypeChannel
Username@lveysiqq
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lveysiqq

Growth

1841861857 August 2026 — 184 subscribers8 August 2026 — 184 subscribers15 August 2026 — 186 subscribers23 August 2026 — 184 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 184–186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 07:17184-2
15 Aug 2026, 03:04186+2
8 Aug 2026, 12:30184no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:51184first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 4 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53435240932012285062522.9%
custom 52581750786207400261715.6%
custom 53998449957861036241513.8%
custom 54044954961798977091211.0%
custom 54450550112497506181211.0%
custom 534389476176377559298.26%
💔98.26%
custom 534372175189115807665.50%
🥰32.75%
😈10.917%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC81 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

билеты в самару или адекватная зарплата билеты в самару или адекватная зарплата..

custom 525817507862074002611custom 54044954961798977095custom 54450550112497506184custom 53435240932012285062custom 53998449957861036242custom 53437217518911580761

2 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC176 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 534352409320122850613custom 53998449957861036246custom 54450550112497506184custom 54044954961798977092🥰1😈1custom 53437217518911580761custom 53438947617637755921

1 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC167 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

такой себе бамбл

💔9custom 53438947617637755927custom 52581750786207400266custom 53435240932012285064custom 53437217518911580762🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC149 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53998449957861036247custom 53435240932012285066custom 54044954961798977095custom 54450550112497506184custom 53437217518911580762🥰1custom 53438947617637755921

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @lveysiqq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“перекатип̶о̶л̶я̶” (@lveysiqq), 184 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lveysiqq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.