某巨鲸33分钟内遭4次BTC多单清算,累计亏损97.27万美元 11 月 13 日,据 Onchain Lens 监测,一名 Hyperliquid 巨鲸交易员在 33 分钟内遭遇 4 次 BTC 多单清算,累计亏损达 97.27 万美元。 目前,该交易员仍持有价值 1616 万美元的 BTC 40 倍杠杆多单,清算价格为 71,119 美元,距离当前价格仅约 1.07%,未实现亏损约 60.95 万美元,其历史累计交易亏损已扩大至 101 万美元。

Channel
律动 BlockBeats
@lvdong1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
104subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004360663815 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lvdong1 |
| Description | 专注加密市场和 Web3 的专业媒体,热点快讯、项目动态和深度研究。 |
| First recorded | 12 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lvdong1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 18:22 | 104 | no change |
| 12 Nov 2026, 17:47 | 104 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.90%
- avg views ÷ 104 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5.1
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 November 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 102 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Links
- 112
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
英伟达面临美司法部反垄断调查,目前无迹象显示黄仁勋将遭刑事指控 11 月 13 日,据美国财经媒体 Semafor 报道,英伟达(NVDA)正面临美国司法部反垄断调查。不过,目前没有迹象显示司法部寻求对英伟达 CEO 黄仁勋提起刑事指控。 此次调查针对英伟达公司的反垄断问题,尚不能据此认定黄仁勋个人涉及刑事案件。
美媒:英伟达临时CEO并非公司重大决策的主导者 11 月 13 日,据 The Information 报道,英伟达临时首席执行官并非公司重大决策的主导者,也不负责制定公司的重大决策议程。 另据 BIT 股票平台数据显示,英伟达日内跌幅收窄至 4% 以内。
黄仁勋已同意向美国国会作证 11 月 13 日,众议院外交委员会主席表示,黄仁勋已同意向国会作证。
【首发】Vanda:散户开盘半小时净买入1.11亿美元英伟达股票,创历史纪录 11 月 12 日,金融市场研究机构 Vanda 数据显示,散户投资者在美股开盘后的前半小时内净买入价值 1.11 亿美元的英伟达(NVDA)股票,创下该股有记录以来开盘阶段最大规模的散户净买入纪录。尽管英伟达近期股价承压,但散户资金仍表现出强劲的逢低买入意愿。
特朗普:苹果的Tim Cook应取代黄仁勋出任英伟达CEO 11 月 12 日,特朗普表示,苹果的 Tim Cook 应取代黄仁勋出任英伟达 CEO。
市场消息:黄仁勋今后将不再在英伟达担任任何职务 11 月 12 日,据市场消息,黄仁勋今后将不再在英伟达担任任何职务。
【首发】「股神」特朗普8月曾申报出售最多100万美元英伟达股票,NVDA自申报以来累计下跌29% 11 月 12 日,美国总统特朗普于今年 8 月 21 日提交文件,申报出售最多 100 万美元的英伟达(NVDA)股票。自该申报日期以来,英伟达股价已累计下跌 29%,目前报 160.64 美元。
【首发】美股低开高走,纳指跌幅收窄至0.38% 11 月 12 日,据 BIT 股票平台数据显示,美股低开高走,纳斯达克综合指数收窄跌幅,最新下跌 0.38%。标普 500 指数跌幅收窄至 0.27%,道指基本持平。
OpenAI融资150亿美元,公司估值达到1.25万亿美元
CZ:英伟达让黄仁勋辞职是一个错误 11 月 12 日,Binance 创始人 CZ 发文表示,英伟达让黄仁勋辞职是一个错误(It's a mistake for Nvidia to let Jensen resign)。 此番言论针对英伟达管理层突发变动。英伟达已宣布黄仁勋辞去 CEO 等职务,由公司原 CFO 科莱特·克雷斯接任临时 CEO。
英伟达股价强势反弹,抹去黄仁勋辞职公告后跌幅 11 月 12 日,据 BIT 股票平台数据显示,美股开盘后,英伟达股价强势反弹,现报 160 美元,已抹去黄仁勋辞职公告发布后的跌幅。
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lvdong1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“律动 BlockBeats” (@lvdong1), 104 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lvdong1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.