Channel
@luxxurybypepel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
277subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002645331687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luxxurybypepel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luxxurybypepel |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 277 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 279 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 278 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 273 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 270 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 269 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
226 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5411488415902377150 | 58 | 25.7% | |
| custom 5339065569255658559 | 40 | 17.7% | |
| custom 5453961802759036250 | 38 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5253649411451419880 | 27 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5269484311626685802 | 22 | 9.73% | |
| custom 5366422943268101690 | 20 | 8.85% | |
| custom 5427000781213560047 | 15 | 6.64% | |
| custom 5411129833377802479 | 6 | 2.65% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
как же мне нравится его улыбка на моих приветах.. самый лучший босс..❤️
custom 541148841590237715012custom 53390655692556585595custom 52694843116266858023custom 52536494114514198801custom 54111298333778024791custom 54270007812135600471custom 54539618027590362501
Signed ww
наконец появился повод сделать новую аву, накидайте реакций кто не спит..))
custom 533906556925565855910custom 54539618027590362503custom 54114884159023771502custom 52694843116266858021custom 54270007812135600471
Signed ww
Channel photo updated
Мне стало скучно и я решила сделать тебе мини подарок я буду безумно рада если тебе понравится ❤️
custom 54539618027590362509custom 53390655692556585593custom 54270007812135600473custom 52694843116266858021custom 54111298333778024791custom 54114884159023771501
Signed ww
ммм какой босс
custom 53664229432681016907custom 52536494114514198802custom 52694843116266858021custom 53390655692556585591
Signed pepelamixx
АХУЕТЬ ОН КАКОЙ КРАСИВЫЙ
custom 53664229432681016908custom 52536494114514198802custom 52694843116266858022custom 53390655692556585591custom 54270007812135600471
Signed kaqwixd
ОБОЖАЮ ЕГО БЛЯ😭❤️
custom 541148841590237715014custom 52536494114514198802custom 52694843116266858021custom 53390655692556585591custom 54111298333778024791custom 54270007812135600471custom 54539618027590362501
Signed ww
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54114884159023771509custom 54270007812135600472custom 54539618027590362502custom 52536494114514198801custom 53390655692556585591
Signed ww
ХААХАХАХА ЧТО
custom 54539618027590362504custom 52536494114514198801custom 52694843116266858021custom 53390655692556585591
Signed nikrols?)
МОЙ
custom 52536494114514198805custom 52694843116266858021custom 54114884159023771501custom 54270007812135600471
Signed карлиск ko.⚔️
АХУЕТЬ
custom 53390655692556585595custom 52536494114514198801custom 52694843116266858021custom 54111298333778024791custom 54114884159023771501custom 54270007812135600471custom 54539618027590362501
Signed карлиск ko.⚔️
у меня дохера вопросов
custom 52536494114514198802custom 52694843116266858021custom 53390655692556585591custom 54270007812135600471
Signed pepelamixx
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @luxxurybypepel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“luxxury” (@luxxurybypepel), 277 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luxxurybypepel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.