Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LUXURY BAES

Channel

LUXURY BAES

@luxurybaes

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,240subscribers

-185 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001600832989
TypeChannel
Username@luxurybaes
CreatedBetween 1 October 2021 and 31 May 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/luxurybaes

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,2408,4258,332.57 August 2026 — 8,425 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,425 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,424 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,411 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,395 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,391 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,376 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,344 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,316 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,301 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,284 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,271 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,253 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,240 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,244 subscribers29 September 2026 — 8,240 subscribers7 August 202629 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 53 days, net -185. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,212–8,453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Sept 2026, 12:208,240-4
18 Sept 2026, 23:398,244+4
15 Sept 2026, 01:218,240-13
11 Sept 2026, 13:188,253-18
6 Sept 2026, 10:418,271-13
2 Sept 2026, 00:248,284-17
29 Aug 2026, 14:358,301-15
26 Aug 2026, 21:038,316-28
23 Aug 2026, 13:068,344-32
19 Aug 2026, 16:148,376-15
16 Aug 2026, 18:088,391-4
13 Aug 2026, 13:358,395-16
10 Aug 2026, 18:248,411-13
7 Aug 2026, 17:488,424-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:008,425no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:568,425first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 50 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
58s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,669 reactions across 50 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,90151.8%
💋55615.2%
💘2817.66%
❤‍🔥2145.83%
💯1684.58%
🥰1183.22%
💅982.67%
😍711.94%
🔥691.88%
💔461.25%
🙏391.06%
🍓360.981%
🕊350.954%
🤝150.409%
😭140.382%
🤗70.191%
😁10.027%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,669 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC540 views84 reactionsread 28 August 2026

со свидания девушка хочет возвращаться домой с неизменным балансом на карте и мыслями «ну какой же он охуенный, походу мне пизда»

💘50❤24🥰10

27 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC620 views77 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

мир, если бы я тщательно обдумывала свою трату денег

💘50❤19🔥8

27 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC611 views56 reactionsread 28 August 2026

девушку должны украшать понты, длинный язык и синдром бога, а не скромность и порядочность👌🏻

❤51💋3💘2

27 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC612 views104 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

к великому сожалению я всегда буду вкуснее сексуальнее ярче всех, кто когда либо меня ненавидел😔💯

💋54❤24🥰22❤‍🔥3💯1

25 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC703 views60 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

когда кто-то рассказывает мне свою любовную драму, но я пережила и страдала в 300 раз больше:

❤49🙏5💋3💯3

25 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC754 views77 reactionsread 28 August 2026

видеть людей в классных аутентичных образах + вкусным парфюмом реально поднимает мне настроение💯🧁⭐️💎👠🔞☕️🍸

💅37❤20💔17💯3

25 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC830 views98 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

я которая потратила 150к за месяц, смотрю как мне приходит зарплата 30к

❤72💘26

21 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈1,160 views66 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

#luxurybaes_tiktok 🫲❤️

❤37💘17💅11😍1

21 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC938 views73 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

я, когда начинаю узнавать своего отца в парне, с которым встречаюсь

❤62🤗6💔5

21 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC874 views58 reactionsread 28 August 2026

где мой Оскар за то что я всю жизнь играю типо у меня все ок???

❤30🤝15💔8💋5

21 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,100 views85 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

купила все свои хотелки, а моральное состояние не улучшилось

❤60💔15💋7😭3

21 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC910 views91 reactionsread 28 August 2026

никогда не давайте шанс mid-ugly лохам……..это неоправданно бустанет их заниженное эго и он будет вести себя так будто лохушка тут ты💯💯

💋47❤22❤‍🔥16💯4💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @luxurybaes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

brunette babe rules
@meboard · 20,010
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 September 2026
coquette diary
@coquettediar · 21,163
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 September 2026
angels space
@angels_spacee · 26,895
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 11 September 2026
girlboss values by алёна м
@girlbossvalues · 28,350
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 9 September 2026
mean girls
@meangirls · 36,453
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
лавандовый сон
@warmluv · 37,189
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 3 September 2026
Брюнетка в шоколаде 🎀
@doraadaryya · 27,509
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 10 September 2026
so sad so sеху
@welcometomyisland · 243,415
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
ох
@theohdaily · 177,106
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
Богатый Папик
@Denis_Baiguzhin · 22,036
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 22 September 2026
vogue is my religion
@voguemr · 104,688
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LUXURY BAES” (@luxurybaes), 8,240 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luxurybaes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.