LIQUID’S BITCOIN IOUS ARE FULLY BACKED AGAIN AFTER A $320 MILLION EXPLOIT A final 250 BTC transfer closed the hole left by September’s bug, but the federation behind the network still hasn’t said who paid to fill it. Read complete news · News on LuxQuant Source: coindesk.com

Channel
LuxQuant Crypto News
@luxquantcryptonews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004359768790 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luxquantcryptonews |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luxquantcryptonews |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 11:06 | 18 | +3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:31 | 15 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:22 | 15 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.17%
- avg views ÷ 18 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.6
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 November 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 33 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
CRYPTO NEWS TRACKS BITCOIN NEAR $78,000 AS BTC ETF OUTFLOWS REACH $643 MILLION Bitcoin began the week near $78,000 after a volatile October close, while a sharp reversal in US spot fund flows added another layer of market uncertainty. The latest complete session saw $643.2 million leave spot Bitcoin ETFs , reversing the inflows recorded in the previous four sessions. The combination has put… Read complete news · Ne…
BITCOIN PRICE FALLS TO $76,455 AS $399M ETF OUTFLOWS PUT $76,400 SUPPORT AT RISK Bitcoin fell to around $76,455 on November 3 after U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $398.6 million in net outflows. BlackRock's IBIT led withdrawals, putting the $76,400 support area in focus. Read complete news · News on LuxQuant Source: Altcoin Buzz
US MIDTERMS ARE HERE: HISTORY POINTS TO A STOCK RALLY BUT TROUBLE FOR BITCOIN Currencies 40383 Market Cap$ 2.69T-0.05% 24h Spot Volume$ 31.67B+5.75% DominanceBTC 57.53%-1.05%ETH 10.30%-0.62% ETH Gas 0.05 Gwei English UpgradeLog in Coins Top 100 Coins Top 100 cryptocurrencies by market capitalizationTrending Cryptos Trending Coins and TokensPerformance Track market performance of… Read complete news · News on LuxQua…
BITCOIN ETF OUTFLOWS HIT BLACKROCK'S ISHARES TRUST 40)clearInterval(iv)},250);window.cnConsent={get:function(){return h.dataset.consent||null},set:set}})(); Bitcoin ETF Outflows Hit BlackRock's iShares Trust Skip to content Menu Search Blockchain Regulation Events Regulation Security Crypto Bitcoin Ethereum Mining Stable Coin NFT Trading DeFi Charts Stablecoin list… Read complete news · News on LuxQuant Source: Th…
BITCOIN TODAY: WHY BTC SLIPS TOWARD $76,000 ON 3 NOVEMBER Read complete news · News on LuxQuant Source: Admirals
INSTITUTIONAL | WHY THE WORLD’S LARGEST SPOT BITCOIN ETF RECORDED NEAR-RECORD DAILY OUTFLOW The latest withdrawals highlight weakening appetite for regulated Bitcoin investment products after months of strong inflows. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) recorded $405.3 million in net outflows, its second-largest daily withdrawal since launching in January 2024 as investors reduced exposure to… Read complete ne…
VITALIK BUTERIN OPENS DEVCON 8 IN COSTUME, WARNS AI COULD CRACK CRYPTO ... News on LuxQuant
ZEC AND NEAR TANK AGAIN, BTC DIVES AHEAD OF US MIDTERM ELECTIONS: MARKET WATCH Currencies 40381 Market Cap$ 2.69T-0.05% 24h Spot Volume$ 31.62B+5.57% DominanceBTC 57.53%-1.05%ETH 10.30%-0.64% ETH Gas 0.05 Gwei English UpgradeLog in Coins Top 100 Coins Top 100 cryptocurrencies by market capitalizationTrending Cryptos Trending Coins and TokensPerformance Track market performance of… Read complete news · News on LuxQu…
WHY ARE BITCOIN, ETHEREUM AND XRP TRADING UNDER PRESSURE? Read complete news · News on LuxQuant Source: FXStreet
MSBT: CHEAP BITCOIN EXPOSURE STILL DEPENDS ON THE ETF PLUMBING (NYSEARCA:MSBT) Bitcoin dropped towards my $74,000 stop loss after Binance's $6.3B hack dragged the leading crypto from $80,300 to $76,400 overnight. It didn't hit it, and BTC is now changing hands near $77,350. The performance meanwhile has renewed interest in the Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar… Read complete news · News on…
XRP LEDGER STABLECOIN SECURITY FIX FACES SECOND DEADLINE AFTER VALIDATOR VOTE DELAY ... News on LuxQuant
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @luxquantcryptonews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LuxQuant Crypto News” (@luxquantcryptonews), 18 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luxquantcryptonews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.