Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐋𝐮𝐱𝐧𝐞𝐭 | لوکس نت

Channel

𝐋𝐮𝐱𝐧𝐞𝐭 | لوکس نت

@luxnetir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

17,309subscribers

-462 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001750586225
TypeChannel
Username@luxnetir
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/luxnetir

Growth

17,30917,77117,5407 August 2026 — 17,771 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,764 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,723 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,637 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,606 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,562 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,508 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,468 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,412 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,309 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -462. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,240–17,840 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:1417,309-103
14 Aug 2026, 18:3817,412-56
13 Aug 2026, 06:5417,468-40
12 Aug 2026, 10:0717,508-54
11 Aug 2026, 13:1317,562-44
10 Aug 2026, 12:4117,606-31
9 Aug 2026, 15:1717,637-86
8 Aug 2026, 14:4617,723-41
7 Aug 2026, 15:2617,764-7
7 Aug 2026, 10:0017,771first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.36%
avg views ÷ 17,309 subscribers
Avg views / post
409
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 April 20266 August 2026)
Views total409
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

214 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7936.9%
💔4018.7%
3415.9%
👎2310.7%
😁2210.3%
🔥146.54%
🗿20.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 19 we hold a reading for · 37%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @luxnetir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC409 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🔴 گزارش کاربران از تغییرات گسترده در کیفیت و نحوه محاسبه اینترنت بر اساس گزارش‌های دریافتی از کاربران، اتصال مستقیم به برخی سرورهای بین‌المللی با اختلال و کاهش کیفیت مواجه شده است. همچنین به‌دلیل تغییرات در DNSهای تحریم‌گذر، دسترسی برخی کاربران به سرویس‌هایی مانند ChatGPT و دیگر پلتفرم‌های تحریم‌شده با مشکل همراه شده است. کاربران همچنین از کاهش پهنای باند اینترنت در ساعات اوج مصرف، اختلال یا قطع اتصال VPNهای بدون ت

👍8🔥1😁1

Signed LUXNET

16 Jul 2026, 20:40 UTC956 views15 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🔴 کاهش پهنای باند اینترنت موبایل در سراسر کشور گزارش‌های دریافتی از کاربران نشان می‌دهد همزمان با کاهش محسوس پهنای باند اینترنت همراه در نقاط مختلف کشور، دسترسی به اینترنت موبایل در برخی مناطق جنوب کشور با اختلالات گسترده مواجه شده و در برخی نقاط نیز قطعی کامل آنتن گزارش شده است. @Luxnetir

👍112😁2

Signed LUXNET

9 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,090 views23 reactionsread 15 August 2026

پروکسی تلگرام براتون بزارم🧙‍♂️⚡️

👍20👎2🔥1

Signed ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐈

7 Jul 2026, 22:54 UTC≈1,240 views0 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

خرید کانفیگ اسپوف(متصل در زمان جنگ) از: @configsalebot 🔗

Signed ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐈

1 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC≈2,260 views7 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔮 لـوکـس‌نـت دوباره روشن شد! 🔮 پس از چند ماه وقفه، ربات لوکس‌نت با سرورهای جدید و سرعت اتمی مجدداً در دسترس شماست! 🚀 💎 ویژگی کانفیگ‌ها➿ ♾ حجم نامحدود (مصرف منصفانه) 🌟 سرعت فوق‌العاده و پینگ عالی 🛡 اتصال پایدار و تضمینی روی همه اپراتورها ✨ قبل از خرید، رایگان تست کنید! ✨ همین حالا وارد ربات بشید و اکانت تست رایگان خودتون رو تحویل بگیرید 👇 🤖 آدرس ربات جهت تست و خرید: 💎 بمال روش 💎

4🔥2👍1

Signed LUXNET

24 Jun 2026, 22:46 UTC≈1,890 views42 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

فرا رسيدن عاشورای حسينی تسليت باد 🖤🥀

💔19👎16👍3🔥2🗿2

Signed Fa

16 Jun 2026, 20:43 UTC≈2,030 views7 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥32👍2

Signed LUXNET

10 Jun 2026, 22:14 UTC≈2,030 views7 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Poll

یه اعلام وضعیت کنید متوجه اوضاعتون بشیم؛ نت در چه حاله؟!

  1. ضعیفه37%
  2. خوبه48%
  3. عالیه21%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍51💔1

Signed Fa

10 Jun 2026, 21:54 UTC≈1,760 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⭕️ گزارش شبکه: گراف شبکه نشان می‌دهد که از دیروز اختلالات محدودی در شبکه وجود داشته است اما به صورت کلی اختلال و محدودیت‌های شدیدی مخصوصا در زمان پیک مصرف وجود ندارد. با توجه به افزایش تنش‌ها در منطقه به نظر می‌رسد هنوز تصمیمی برای قطع کامل اینترنت اتخاذ نشده است، هنوز هشداری به دیتاسنتر ها ارسال نشده و گراف شبکه نشان می‌دهد اختلالات معمولی که همیشه قبل از قطع کامل اینترنت در شبکه نمایان میشد فعلا وجود ندارد. @Luxne

👍3💔21

Signed LUXNET

27 May 2026, 19:49 UTC≈2,080 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

❌پایان حجم

2👍2🔥1

Signed LUXNET | صبور باشید

27 May 2026, 19:16 UTC≈2,070 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

4👍3🔥2

Signed LUXNET | صبور باشید

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @luxnetir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Jun 2026, 22:14 UTCAnonymous Poll145 voters

یه اعلام وضعیت کنید متوجه اوضاعتون بشیم؛ نت در چه حاله؟!

  1. ضعیفه37%
  2. خوبه48%
  3. عالیه21%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,370,357 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐋𝐮𝐱𝐧𝐞𝐭 | لوکس نت” (@luxnetir), 17,309 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luxnetir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.