Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𓏲︎︎ فَـرح .

Channel

𓏲︎︎ فَـرح .

@luv4_farah

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,445subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001759945575
TypeChannel
Username@luv4_farah
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/luv4_farah

Growth

1,4431,4661,454.58 August 2026 — 1,464 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,466 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,443 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,445 subscribers1,4458 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,440–1,469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 13:151,445+2
12 Aug 2026, 04:181,443-23
9 Aug 2026, 05:021,466+2
8 Aug 2026, 18:021,464first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
93.6%
avg views ÷ 1,445 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,350
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
45.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 April 20268 August 2026)
Views total8,112
Reactions total3,700
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

8,485 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 58414301470638808453,04035.8%
💘2,07024.4%
custom 58416078255659503931,57718.6%
custom 54002603534833761871762.07%
custom 60507590877700517541752.06%
custom 58034314418197708131631.92%
custom 57962823742662976011611.90%
custom 54516391703447200141511.78%
custom 52494072679581842361461.72%
custom 54517223724511773231361.60%
custom 58051963340760110691361.60%
custom 57717219817412438301131.33%
custom 57898811550083396481091.28%
custom 57962202174995897971031.21%
custom 5859630015146105548951.12%
custom 5845827235797277606810.955%
custom 5864104585089522953290.342%
🕊240.283%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,485reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
126
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 20 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @luv4_farah. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 April 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC29 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @swan_feelings

الله يشيل باقي غلاك ، و نعلن التّوبه .

4 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC175 views24 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

هيّ أنا بعدّ كلشي مشاعر عطيتها ، بموت مسمومة🤩 .

🕊24

24 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC≈5,370 views2,070 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026

🌟🌟بِمناســ ٢٤-٧ ـبة عيد ميلادي! 🌟 كل سنة وأنا عم أتقرّب من النسخة اللي بحبها، كل سنة وأنا قادرة أخلق فرحتي بإيدي، كل سنة وأنا الحضن الآمن إلي، ولقلبي، وللناس اللي بحبها، كل سنة وخطواتي عم تقرّبني من كل شي بستحقّه. الحمد لله ؛ على كل نعمة عشتها، و على كل دعوة استجا

💘2,070

21 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC498 views29 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

ُ هلق أنتَ ؛ مش بشر ، مش ملاك مش حجر ، مش رماد هلق انتَ ، شو أنتَ ؟ - كومة ذكريات -

custom 586410458508952295329

19 Jul 2026, 21:25 UTC≈1,530 views27 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

تصدّقنيش ، مجرد أغنية .

custom 584160782556595039327

19 Jul 2026, 21:22 UTC510 views1,550 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

كِرهتَك انا صدِقني ، بُعدك بَطل يِحرقني🤩 .

custom 58416078255659503931,550

14 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC703 views3,040 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

من فترة فارقتك ؛ قلت : يوم ، يومين ، بكرا بنسى ، بكرا بتعوَّد ، بكرا بفهم ، بكرا بوعىٰ ، اليوم ؛ بتكون مارقة السَّنة . وأنا كل يوم بفتح عيوني الصبح ، وبحبّك أكتر من اليوم اللّي قبله . لا بقتنع بغيابك ، و لا بقتنع إنّي فقدتك .

custom 58414301470638808453,040

17 Jun 2026, 00:33 UTC≈1,420 views95 reactions8 Starsread 8 August 2026

١٧- ٦ ؛ وبِوقت ٣:٠٣٣ ، اللي بخاف منّه . حابّة احكيلك ، رغم إنّي عارفة إنّو ما رح يلفتك تقرأ . في شي عم ينتهي جوّاتي وأنا رافضة ! رافضة لهفتي تجاهك تخلص . و رافضة الثّورة يلي جوّاتي تتركك . وأنتَ غبي ما بتقدر . بخاف عليك من قسوة النّاس ، وأنا مش موجودة لواسيك . بخاف ضيّعك وما لاقيك . و بخاف أكتبلك وما ورجيك . بخاف يعدّي يوم وما يكون عندي الإ

custom 585963001514610554895

10 Jun 2026, 21:12 UTC≈1,670 views81 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

🌟 ما نَسيتَك ؛ و بس يعديّ الوَقت بلاك ، و اشتقلك كتير ، بِبكي ، بِتضَلّ بِبالي ، عَم تصارِع الأفكار التّانية ، و إنتَ دايمًا الفايِز الوَحيد🤩.

custom 584582723579727760681

5 Jun 2026, 17:08 UTC≈1,640 views103 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

جبلي معَك ؛ قَـمر حافي ، و شَمس غافية ، جبلي معَك ؛ سلّة مطفّحة بِنجوم ، و مغلّفة بِغيوم .

custom 5796220217499589797103

3 Jun 2026, 18:09 UTC≈1,600 views113 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

قَـلبي بِــــدِق على بابَــك ، و بتــشنقني بـالوَتين🔪!

custom 5771721981741243830113

2 Jun 2026, 09:12 UTC≈1,560 views109 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

خلّيني ضلّ حبّك من بعيد ، إذا قلبي إلك ، شو خصّه النّصيب💜؟

custom 5789881155008339648109

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @luv4_farah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 952,830 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𓏲︎︎ فَـرح .” (@luv4_farah), 1,445 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luv4_farah.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.