10 measurements spanning 23 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,529–7,590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 04:57
7,536
-8
26 Aug 2026, 06:54
7,544
-7
23 Aug 2026, 08:27
7,551
-3
19 Aug 2026, 09:34
7,554
-7
16 Aug 2026, 16:25
7,561
-12
12 Aug 2026, 23:12
7,573
-6
10 Aug 2026, 01:51
7,579
-4
6 Aug 2026, 19:01
7,583
+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:19
7,582
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:58
7,582
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.8%
avg views ÷ 7,536 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,700
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
20 (9 May 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
5,390
Reactions total
284
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 38s
Average length
1m 49s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,861 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,473
38.2%
👍
1,009
26.1%
🔥
361
9.35%
😁
326
8.44%
🙏
242
6.27%
😭
150
3.89%
😱
127
3.29%
👏
78
2.02%
🤝
58
1.50%
👌
37
0.958%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,861reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lushnikov_Alexey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
80 лет исполнилось бы Льву Шеглову. На фоне всего безумства, происходящего сейчас на одной восьмой части суши, это событие останется за скобками. Это очевидно. Но внутри этих скобок есть люди, для которых этот человек больше, чем явление. В современном мире всегда найдутся люди, для которых он стал талисманом того самого точного времени.
Не смотри, Лёва, ты там на нас сверху с таким укором. Нам здесь самим хреново о…
Внесение Павла Дурова в перечень экстремистов и террористов стало топовым свидетельством неадекватности и глубокой деградации путинских. Они не понимают, что такое Telegram, Дуров, интернет и как со всем этим живут люди.
Трудно представить более недальновидное решение. Объявляя войну Telegram и атакуя Дурова как бренд, который давно стал одним из весьма влиятельных и узнаваемых в мире, российская власть сама создает…
Ровно 5 лет назад, в 10:40 утра 30 июля 2021 года, я покинул Санкт-Петербург и, возможно, навсегда уехал из России.
Выезд был тяжелым. И не с первого раза. За пару недель до этого пограничники развернули меня прямо в аэропорту.
Пять лет назад, поднимаясь по трапу, я ещё не знал, что меня ждёт дорога без права на возвращение. Не знал, что совсем скоро привычный и дорогой мне мир навсегда уйдёт в историю.
В самолете …
Из источников - сегодня задержали Махова. Если это подтвердится, то у Аркадия Ротенберга совсем плохи дела. Что лишний раз подтверждает ту версию, которую я сформулировал текстом выше и в программе на Breakfast Show у Александра Плющева. «Работа» Путина с ближними элитами продолжается.
Иванов. Трабер. Старовойт. Что общего?
Одним из ключевых механизмов управления государством, который Путин выстраивал на протяжении многих лет, является контроль над своими элитами. Отраслевыми. Корпоративными. Территориальными. Силовыми.
Этот механизм опирается на два взаимосвязанных элемента.
Первый — способность находить баланс интересов различных элитных групп, договариваться с ними, разводить их и их интересы…
Пожалуй, из всей той официальной мерзости звучащей от путинских, это выделяется особой гадливостью. Хочется только одного: чтобы его рано и не поздно - отдали в руки Фейгину.
Я с большим удовольствием побывал в гостях у замечательного Александра Плющева, Ольги Нитки и Юрия Белята — в эфире программы канала The Breakfast Show The стрим.
Ночь — моя любимая тема. Получилась яркая встреча с ночными людьми. На канале у Александра Плющева сейчас живут ночные разговоры - размышления и неспешный обмен мнениями.
https://youtu.be/hgs-47KtqtA?is=fVS7S-O2ONImpnlE
Я принял участие и выставил на аукцион свою новую картину из коллекции «Луагора в Эпоху Постправды».
Информация от организаторов:
Это благотворительный аукцион в пользу OGO-centre — дома для украинских детей-беженцев в Эстонии. Вместе с вашими любимыми артистами, спортсменами и общественными деятелям вы вносите вклад в безопасное пространство, где дети могут учиться, общаться, заниматься творчеством и оставаться час…
❤69👏16👍12🙏4🔥3👌2😁1
Signed Alexey Lushnikov
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lushnikov_Alexey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,523,467 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вестник Мракобеса @nikabelonika · 67,359 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lushnikov” (@lushnikov_Alexey), 7,536 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lushnikov_Alexey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
