Channel
@luonslyyezzz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
76subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001470144807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luonslyyezzz |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luonslyyezzz |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 11:18 | 76 | +1 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 17:20 | 75 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 76 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 77 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 78 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 78 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
64 reactions across 7 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5188426450411209166 | 9 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5447625746744879896 | 9 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5393341225594010044 | 7 | 10.9% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5395461457674515619 | 6 | 9.38% | |
| custom 5348043519783093279 | 5 | 7.81% | |
| custom 5312538283572483165 | 4 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5348378260944211108 | 4 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5393572698561461640 | 4 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5321301064828334711 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| custom 5312291026600218911 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5357484364705834421 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5366277318106957421 | 2 | 3.13% |
Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️макияжик с малышкой cheeryep! такая она нежная! без базы кстати тоже очень хорошее покрытие, но чтоб передать насыщенность пастельных цветов, я использовала beauty bayевскую’⭐️ по мне самая лучшая, боюсь когда моя баночка закончится, из аналогов наверное только белый пигмент от influence 👄
custom 53954614576745156195custom 54476257467448798963custom 53933412255940100442
я повелась на нее! теперь я хочу все!🎀 супер милашка! за свою цену мы хотели ее! сияшки просто огненные💍💍💍 ждите макияжики только с ней!
custom 53933412255940100443custom 51884264504112091662custom 53935726985614616402
охринеть, ВАУ!⭐️⭐️ как я люблю красивые рассылочки! просто не могу, храню каждую такую коробку! huemi - просто вау! слов нет!💍
custom 51884264504112091666custom 53125382835724831654custom 53213010648283347113
MUL MUL отправил своих малышек📎 черная термотушь - с силикон щеточкой; хорошенькая, но минус - ее не поставить, вся основа туши круглая спонж - мили оч, хорошо набухает, хорошо увеличивается румяшки - в оттенке inanna, на ручке оч нежные
custom 53935726985614616402custom 51884264504112091661custom 53954614576745156191
какое разочарование пимсик!🥂🐱 первый раз повелась на такую коллабу, и то из-за бальзамчика за 1000💄 пимсик отвратительный, (я в принципе не скажу, что фанатка PIMS, по мне неоправданно дорого) не выпила и половины - бальзамчик надо будет затестить, но на вид топи топ💋 и кстати выбора аромата у бальзамчика тоже нет, только цитрус, такая вот хуйня - собачка 🐶
custom 54476257467448798966❤2custom 53662773181069574212custom 53933412255940100442
как меня забайтила эта коллаба! пимсик рядом с домом жди меня!💭
custom 53483782609442111084custom 53480435197830932793custom 53122910266002189112
бальзамчики для губ FarandFor🤍 «новый бренд Натальи Шик» 8 бальзамчиков - 3 из которых имею цвет только в стике - 01, 02, 09 - белый, серый и розовый💐 остальные бальзамы - базовые, нюдовые, с легким оттенком на губах кстати на удивление очень приятная текстура, легкая, невесомая на губах🐚
❤5custom 53480435197830932792custom 53574843647058344212
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @luonslyyezzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“luons.lyyezzz” (@luonslyyezzz), 76 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luonslyyezzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.