Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for луничка

Channel

луничка

@luni4kaaa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,205subscribers

-1,980 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001391670024
TypeChannel
Username@luni4kaaa
Descriptionlalala & okokok girl 🌾🪐 каждый новый подписчик этой странички продлевает жизнь бездомному котёнку на час. подумай. реклама – @lunichwork сотрудничество - [email protected] https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68e8b91e9244d8c57349adff
Created5 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/luni4kaaa

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,20527,18526,1957 August 2026 — 27,185 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,185 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,157 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,119 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,075 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,031 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,937 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,887 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,776 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,693 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,599 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,528 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,484 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,468 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,428 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,404 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,313 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,282 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,206 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,161 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,137 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,106 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,080 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,043 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,023 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,982 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,928 subscribers6 September 2026 — 25,851 subscribers9 September 2026 — 25,749 subscribers12 September 2026 — 25,673 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,618 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,572 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,502 subscribers26 September 2026 — 25,205 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -1,980. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,908–27,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 13:5925,205-297
17 Sept 2026, 15:1925,502-70
15 Sept 2026, 14:2125,572-46
13 Sept 2026, 20:2225,618-55
12 Sept 2026, 03:0225,673-76
9 Sept 2026, 21:1825,749-102
6 Sept 2026, 15:3725,851-77
4 Sept 2026, 03:4125,928-54
2 Sept 2026, 19:0825,982-41
1 Sept 2026, 20:4426,023-20
31 Aug 2026, 17:4426,043-37
30 Aug 2026, 17:3426,080-26
29 Aug 2026, 20:3726,106-31
28 Aug 2026, 17:1726,137-24
27 Aug 2026, 18:2326,161-45
26 Aug 2026, 15:2926,206-76
25 Aug 2026, 16:5326,282-31
24 Aug 2026, 15:1526,313-91
22 Aug 2026, 22:3626,404-24
21 Aug 2026, 11:4926,428first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.7%
avg views ÷ 25,205 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,300
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held80 (2 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total205,410
Reactions total12,324
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,670
Videos
≈323
Links
≈146

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 15s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

53,013 reactions across 80 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤32,45261.2%
❤‍🔥10,96220.7%
💋9,59918.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53,013 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 80 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @luni4kaaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.25%
1 of 80 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
9,300
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
11,600
over 79 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjde3xKV126 August 202626 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 17:32 UTC≈6,320 views627 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

не знаю как вам объяснить, но чувствую себя сейчас так

❤402❤‍🔥128💋97

27 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC≈8,340 views1,004 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

приятный рандом месяца🧡 кидайте в комменты свой!

❤613❤‍🔥225💋166

27 Sept 2026, 14:24 UTC≈8,840 views713 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026

не приходите ко мне за спокойным и взвешенным советом. я за расставание, блокировку, сжигание мостов и иногда немножко криминала

❤441❤‍🔥154💋118

27 Sept 2026, 14:05 UTC≈8,660 views614 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

возвращение в канал через 3…2….1…..

❤369💋124❤‍🔥121

24 Sept 2026, 19:10 UTC≈10,400 views946 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

карьерный рост? нет спасибо, я уехала сажать нектариновое дерево в орел

❤596❤‍🔥206💋144

24 Sept 2026, 18:47 UTC≈10,200 views821 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

мама готовит блины, папа заваривает чай + сваты по телику 🥹❤️‍🩹

❤498❤‍🔥190💋133

24 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC≈11,000 views760 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

в одно окно смотрели двое

❤473❤‍🔥158💋129

22 Sept 2026, 19:34 UTC≈11,600 views337 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

включаю этот фильм в список своих любимых 🤩 грустно, что эта история снята не в формате сериала, я бы хотела пожить с этими героями подольше 😔🙏🏼 веришь каждому кадру, проникаешься, переживаешь, радуешься с ними молодой учитель переезжает в Нью-Йорк и берётся за один из самых сложных классов в школе, где дети из неблагополучных семей давно потеряли интерес к учёбе и доверие к взрослым обязательно к просмотру !!

❤231💋54❤‍🔥52

22 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC≈10,800 views517 reactionsread 28 September 2026

не могу определиться… для меня соц сети это способ получения социальных поглаживаний или «моя страничка, моя жизнь, че хочу то и выкладываю»

❤316❤‍🔥107💋94

21 Sept 2026, 19:39 UTC≈11,300 views464 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video

как они это все построили без колонки JBL

❤296💋91❤‍🔥77

20 Sept 2026, 20:28 UTC≈11,100 views658 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

по планам взять этот идеальный иишный сметанник из спара и съесть его дома в одно лицо

❤420❤‍🔥134💋104

20 Sept 2026, 18:32 UTC≈11,000 views325 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

моя лента сейчас состоит из новостей о беременности моих знакомых/блогерш, и вот таких видео

❤218❤‍🔥61💋46

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @luni4kaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LAVRISON
@lavrisonn · 21,657
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 22 September 2026
Алисочка Ваксман
@alisochkavaksman · 35,612
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 22 September 2026
анютины глазки
@lovatikann · 49,079
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“луничка” (@luni4kaaa), 25,205 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luni4kaaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.