Channel
@luncosim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001966359728 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luncosim |
| Description | Opensource Lunar Settlement Chat https://t.me/luncosim_chat |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luncosim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 19 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 19 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2025 to 14 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Some actual good news to share: LORS just got accepted for a lightning talk at the LSIC Spring Meeting. The talk is called “The Interface Gap in Lunar Surface Mobility: Characterizing Interoperability Barriers and an Open Framework Approach for Rover-Lander Integration.” For anyone who hasn’t been following along, LORS (Lunar Open-source Rover Standard) is an open standard we started developing with financial suppo…
🎉 Happy New Year, Space Innovators! 🚀 Thank you for making 2025 stellar with us! To launch your 2026, here's our gift: The AI4Space Guide! 🎁 Now, any AI (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) can help you build lunar simulations. No coding? No problem. 📝 Just prompt this and get a step-by-step guide to build your lunar base in LunCoSim: Help me build lunar simulations using LunCoSim. Context: https://github.com/LunCoSim/ai4sp…
🚀 LORS UPDATE 🚀 Yesterday we presented our vision for open lunar rover standards at the MoonDAO Town Hall! Problem: Every rover team reinvents the wheel Our Solution: LORS - an open-source framework for a collaborative lunar future Everyone can contribute! 👉 Watch the full presentation on MoonDAO's YT channel
🔥 Exclusive Community Giveaway! Hey folks! To celebrate our amazing community, we're giving away 2 FREE tickets to DevConnect — biggest and hottest Eth Event of the Year! First come, first served. Didn't make it? 👉 Not a contributor? Let's change that! Fill out the form: https://tally.so/r/3jX6aE
🌙 BIG NEWS: Lunar Open-source Rover Standard (LORS) Project Launch! 🚀 Hey everyone! We're officially kicking off LORS initiative - an open-source project to standardize lunar rover design and operations (think CubeSat standards, but for Moon rovers). What we're building: ❇️Open framework for lunar rover design & testing ❇️Shared simulation tools ❇️Industry standards review & recommendations ❇️Community-driven deve…
🔥2🤯1
🧪 Yapping Protocol is now LIVE! 🧬 More Yaps = More $FURMION!🧪 Still in alpha (so mind the occasional hairball), but ready for your analysis. 🔬Procedure: 1. Secure your lab access: https://furmeowster.onrender.com 2. Deploy Yaps for $FURMION on X 3. Collect weekly rewards for your data! 🌡 Let's test this together. For science! 🐾
❤🔥1
We've hit a milestone: 69 amazing contributors are now on board our space mission at LunCo! 🚀 Let's just say the level of collaboration is... out of this world 😉 Join us! 🌚 https://tally.so/r/3jX6aE
Heads up, LunCo community!👀 🚀 Our team is working tirelessly on the final stretch of our new Enterprise Management System — HyperDrive 🌒 This is a game-changer for us—it will supercharge our ability to develop, improve, and scale the LuncoSim platform efficiently. Get ready for what's next! 🚀
🔥 PURRReply Alpha Yapp Quest ———————————— GM Gm, let’s yap $FURMION in the comments of KOLs tweets! ———————————— 📌 Info 1️⃣ Budget: $10+200k $FURMION (200 posts) 2️⃣ Payment: $0.05 + 1k $FURMION per Tweet 3️⃣ Limit: Max 10 replies per yapper per day 💬 Reply Post Rules: ▪️ Only reply under high-quality tweets: • 1000+ impressions • 20+ likes • 10+ reposts • Not older than 12 hours when raided 👥 Audience (pick f…
Another huge thing! https://x.com/TencentHunyuan/status/1949288986192834718
Much needed tech for the sim! https://youtu.be/vyOUX-uB_PQ?si=SDADlDi1vEXu4BiN
Wow, MPULSe made 5x! https://zora.co/coin/base:0x67bdf886ce26bc888ad507d9ad679a7dcd0d8715?referrer=0x192deccd15a5e99e069bd9756dd4831ce134274d
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @luncosim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 847,006 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LunCo (Lunar Company)” (@luncosim), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luncosim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.