Channel
@lumia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13,192subscribers
-105 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002124670905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lumia |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lumia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 13,192 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 13,206 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 13,222 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 13,236 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 13,252 | -16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 13,268 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 13,282 | -15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 13,297 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 16 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
698 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 243 | 34.8% | |
| ❤ | 148 | 21.2% | |
| 🤡 | 122 | 17.5% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 5.30% | |
| 👀 | 35 | 5.01% | |
| 🤣 | 29 | 4.15% | |
| 🤝 | 26 | 3.72% | |
| 🤔 | 19 | 2.72% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 2.01% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 1.86% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 698reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2025 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lumia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2025 to 15 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚀 Areal Finance запускается на Futarchy Давно не писали. Сейчас расскажем что происходит. Мы запускаем интересный эксперимент: выставили лаунч на futard.io — 50% проекта за $10,000. Да, половина протокола токенизации реальных активов за десять тысяч долларов. Звучит как безумие, но для нас это в первую очередь эксперимент с futarchy — и он открывает крайне интересные возможности в плане легализации и структуризации…
💩41❤16
Сегодня будет стрим в 19:00 по МСК https://www.twitch.tv/thegooseprime
💩29❤12
File, posted without a caption
❤23💩22
Отчеты по работе Авто за периоды с Сентября по Декабрь 2025 P.s. Расчеты выполнены в Дирхамах ОАЭ P.p.s. Сегодня будут добавлены награды за Декабрь в стейкинг пул. А также часть RWT для распределения будет выкуплена с пула ликвидности.
❤19💩15
Всех с наступившим Новым годом 🎄. Праздники подошли к концу, а впереди у нас большое количество работы. Для тех, кто не следит за происходящим или не состоит в Discord, вот краткая сводка за 3 месяца: В августе мы реализовали часть NFT Real Citizens. Общий саплай был зафиксирован на уровне 500 штук, часть из которых находится на балансе DAO. Изначально цель заключалась в выпуске 1000 NFT для закрытия всех потребно…
❤32💩22
С наступающим Новым годом, комьюнити AREAL 🎄 Спасибо каждому, кто был с нами в этом году. Кто следил, задавал вопросы, критиковал, поддерживал и оставался рядом. Этот год был непростым. Были ошибки. Были сложные решения. Были моменты пересборки концепций, механик, подходов и самих себя. Но именно в такие периоды и формируется фокус. Не на шуме. Не на хайпе. А на том, что действительно имеет значение. За этот год …
💩43❤35
Апдейт по ликвидности 💧 Наш четвёртый партнёр добавил в пул ещё 4 300 USDC, доведя общий объём ликвидности в стейблкоинах до 7 300 USDC. Мы также добавили зеркальный объём ликвидности в RWT — токены выделены из числа нераспределённых. Кроме того, ликвидность была реструктурирована и приведена в диапазон от 0.9 до 1.1 USDC за 1 RWT по модели Curve, с максимальной концентрацией в районе 1$. Это повысит устойчивость…
👍15😁12
Наш четвёрый партнёр добавил в пул ликвидности 3 000 USDC 💧 Теперь каждый желающий может купить токены RWT напрямую через пул: www.meteora.ag/dlmm/HZfxT7XpaQzNu7q4yRb8aX6BhiWoEMyxtj1RZy76TMA1 Сделать это можно прямо в Meteora - во вкладке Swap. Выбираете токен RWT, указываете сумму и проводите обмен. 💡 Совет: если токен не отображается сразу - добавьте его по контракту.
🤣29🤡27
Вчера вечером мы разослали токен RWT (Real World Token) и сразу же создали базовый пул ликвидности на Meteora Вот он, кстати: https://www.meteora.ag/dlmm/HZfxT7XpaQzNu7q4yRb8aX6BhiWoEMyxtj1RZy76TMA1 Из интересного: механизм концентрации ликвидности работает очень круто. Ликвидность была размещена в диапазоне от 0.95$ до 1.05$ через Curve. Мы залили от лица мультисига 100 RWT и 100 USDC. Естественно, из-за малого о…
🤡16🔥14
Так выглядит процесс отправки токена RWT от нашего лица
🤡16👏13
Текущую неделю я проболел Уже чувствую себя более-менее и планомерно возвращаюсь к работе. Из важного: Женя прилетел в Минск для встреч и проработки сотрудничества с банком. Основной фокус сейчас на финализации пользовательского приложения. Третий квартал подходит к концу, и пришлось многое дорабатывать из-за ограничения total supply в 1000 NFT. Параллельно делаем корпоративный вариант фронта для демонстраций. Дел…
🤡27👍18
Последнюю неделю меня не покидает одна гипотеза, которую очень хочется проверить У нас есть опыт работы с банками, и, кажется, его можно применить внутри проекта. А значит открыть путь к масштабированию через b2b-партнёрства. ✨ Если коротко: - У банков есть непрофильные активы, которые буквально напрашиваются на токенизацию - У нас есть пусть костыльное, но работающее решение с механизмом ликвидности - Всё это лож…
🤡36💩16
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lumia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 253,666 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Realist (Areal CEO)” (@lumia), 13,192 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lumia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.