Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

撸猫社

@lumaoshe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,184subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001211968196
TypeChannel
Username@lumaoshe
Created13 May 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lumaoshe

Growth

5,1845,1955,189.56 August 2026 — 5,195 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,195 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,187 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,184 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,182–5,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:165,184-3
10 Aug 2026, 20:515,187-8
7 Aug 2026, 15:325,195no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:465,195first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 5,184 subscribers
Avg views / post
846
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
24
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held26 (26 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total20,314
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 58s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 01:44 UTC79 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

上海暴雨的猫猫 #孤单听雨的猫 #可怜的猫猫 #我在外面有猫 #暴雨 #大雨一直下 #雨一直下个不停 #可怜小猫咪 #淋雨的感觉 阅读更多 | 原文链接

10 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC363 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

小咪和小孩有啥区别❤ 有点像我小时候玩水的样子😂 #小白猫也很可爱 #宠物玩水日记 #猫 #猫咪 #玩水还松弛 #世界不能没有小猫 #乖乖的猫儿 #可爱猫猫 #猫猫的生活 #世界破破烂烂猫猫缝缝补补 原文链接

10 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC349 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

原来牛也喜欢撸猫 #小红书土猫大赏 #萌宠搞笑视频 #一方水土养一方猫 #通人性的猫 #牛 #人和动物的治愈 #全世界就是围着猫打转 #动物也有爱 视频来源于网络 原文链接

10 Aug 2026, 02:26 UTC334 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

狮子妈妈守护宝宝的温柔瞬间 啊~对对对! 你是麻麻的宝宝,长麻麻身上得了[暗中观察R] #狮子 #保护野生动物 阅读更多 | 原文链接

7 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC472 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

怕打扰到拉里,英国新首相不带爱犬入住官邸 #小猫拉里 #Larry #猫猫 #可爱 #热点 #国际新闻 #英国 #小猫咪 #猫咪 #猫 原文链接

6 Aug 2026, 01:41 UTC640 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐈:世界上zui便宜的心理医生 #猫咪 #没有小猫这个地球怎么转

4 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC666 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @xhsypVideo

小西几|麻麻别走那么快,好像又饿了 非洲草原上的狮群和他们的可爱小狮子 但在残酷的自然法则和生存环境中 你知道吗 这些可爱的小西几只50%的概率活到1岁 他们只有1/3的概率活过2岁 所以阳光正好,小狮子们开心一天是一天吧 原文链接

4 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC522 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

,虎虎和喵喵的爱,谁懂啊!🐯🐱 #小老虎 #动物也有爱 #大猫 #动物 #虎 #老虎不发威当我是病猫 原文链接

2 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC698 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @xhsypVideo

🦋🧸疑?谁家“小鸭子”宝跑出来咯 视频来源:新华社快看 原文链接

2 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC628 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

当我带猫熬夜不让它睡觉,没想到… 原文链接

2 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC590 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

🦁:我超凶的!别惹我!(被叼走) 来源:@今日哈基米 原文链接

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @lumaoshe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 996,407 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“撸猫社” (@lumaoshe), 5,184 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lumaoshe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.