Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

露露的小家

@lulu2003aab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3,567subscribers

+1,961 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003970576185
TypeChannel
Username@lulu2003aab
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 29 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lulu2003aab

Growth

1,6053,6472,6266 August 2026 — 1,606 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,605 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,647 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,567 subscribers3,5676 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1,961. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,299–3,953 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:093,567-80
10 Aug 2026, 14:453,647+2,042
7 Aug 2026, 04:201,605-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:461,606first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.83%
avg views ÷ 3,567 subscribers
Avg views / post
279
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.863%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,145
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1230.8%
😍923.1%
🤩717.9%
💋512.8%
👌37.69%
👍37.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC11 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👋💍 幸运骰子惊喜价课程开启啦! 💍👋 在优惠的同时增加了惊喜宝宝们准备好迎接自己的幸运时刻了吗?✨✨✨ 777¥~参与一次幸运摇骰,根据摇出的点数解锁专属惊喜课程💍💍 🎲 摇到 1-2-3-4点: 解锁原价1000P课程 🎲 摇到 5点: 解锁原价1800PP课程 🎲 摇到 6点: 解锁下午茶原价4000 / 3小时不限次体验 ✨ 幸运累计兑换规则: 🔓 累计4个P 🔓 或累计3个PP 🔓 或下午茶 + 1个PP 即可兑换一次夜课体验🔑 幸运加倍奖励: 如果连续两次摇出🎲🎲6点 额外赠送:夜课一次和下午茶一次💍 不知道谁会成为那个幸运宝宝呢?🥰 活动规则: 每位宝宝每次活动仅有1次摇骰机会 惊喜价期间,每人最多参与4次 摇出多的课程可以存课 先付款后摇骰 最终以骰子🎲显示点数对应福利为准 想参与幸运惊喜课程的宝宝,联系我叭🔑 🎲 好运已经准备好,下一位幸运儿可能就是你!✨✨✨✨✨ 私信:@ulu2003a

❤‍🔥2🤩2💋1

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC12 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

回来开课啦宝宝,接明天预定喔❤️

❤‍🔥2💋1

2 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC277 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号:H178539633264 🎰 罗湖露露活动 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 加入汇总 https://t.me/addlist/movyplm6sMFmY2Y1 福利频道 https://t.me/+TQaqExjK7sZiNGI1 💁 参与人数:15人 🎅 联系领奖:@lulu2003aa 1. 水果 曹操(上岸in... 奖品:P优惠100 2. OneOne 奖品:P优惠100 3. Jack Allop... 奖品:P优惠100 4. 003ABCup 奖品:PP优惠200 5. 鱼子酱 Aaa 奖品:PP优惠200 6. 阿尔法 奖品:PP优惠200 7. cheng yi 奖品:PP优惠200 8. chuji自闭版 奖品:PP优惠200 9. 今晚 他 奖品:夜课优惠500 祝大家心想事成好运连连!

❤‍🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC287 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎉 抽奖《罗湖 露露 @lulu2003aa 抽奖活动》(编号:417)已成功开奖! 👤 创建人:673492295 📊 参与人数:14 人 🏆 中奖名单: 1. wty (@wty857) [id 7517189252] (奖品为:P100) 2. no bo (@jashua1968) [id 5483611755] (奖品为:P100) 3. Peter (@yujiePeter) [id 5279883559] (奖品为:P100) 4. 诚意刚 王 (@go13go6) [id 5752655448] (奖品为:PP200) 5. Loretta Etter (@wangouda) [id 8526646036] (奖品为:PP200) 6. hoho pdx (@rrjoy1) [id 8198771363] (奖品为:PP200) 7. Just do it (@Vincenzo9978) [id 697

❤‍🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC268 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

哥哥送我小星星⭐️ 怎么用呀😘

🤩1😍1

1 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC246 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

今天只接外出🧏‍♀️

😍2❤‍🔥1💋1

1 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC235 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

抽奖罗湖露露 @lulu2003aa 优惠卷抽奖(编号L178532595735)已成功开奖: 创建人:群里确认本人账号 主动联系续费是骗子 雁(复活版)[5952828443] 已参与人数:24 中奖名单如下: 楚*[50114369**](奖品为p100优惠卷) Pete*[52798835**](奖品为p100优惠卷) OneOn*[56752645**](奖品为pp200优惠卷) 003ABCu*[59599096**](奖品为p100优惠卷) 啊*[61734053**](奖品为pp200优惠卷) 鱼子*[68084192**](奖品为pp200优惠卷) 莫若安*[75414506**](奖品为pp200优惠卷) 阿尔*[78399407**](奖品为pp200优惠卷)

❤‍🔥2💋1🤩1

31 Jul 2026, 03:10 UTC371 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

来一杯续命咖啡🌸🌸🌸 🉑约🉑上门🧏‍♀️

😍2💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @lulu2003aab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,245,864 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“露露的小家” (@lulu2003aab), 3,567 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lulu2003aab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.