Channel
@luksbo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,673subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001959370567 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luksbo |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luksbo |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 2,673 | +27 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 2,646 | -12 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 2,658 | -7 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 2,665 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 2,670 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 2,673 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 2,680 | -14 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 2,694 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 2,702 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 2,705 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 2,707 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 2,704 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 2,704 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
601 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5253902260471109523 | 260 | 43.3% | |
| ❤ | 213 | 35.4% | |
| custom 5253474829620778251 | 128 | 21.3% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 601 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📷📷⟡ лиса ✶ поговорим? эстетика душевных разговоров с которой хочу вас познакомить !🍵 🌫️🧺 ’’ 𐙚 это блог лисы - уютный островок с созерцанием мерной жизни • книжные обсуждения • путешествия с кошкой Наной и жизнь у моря • коллекционирование фигурок, обсуждение аниме и фильмов и жизнь, за которой интересно смотреть ~ заглядывай, здесь все свои ‘’ 🪷
❤17custom 52539022604711095236custom 52534748296207782515
🤩🤩 🤩 `• ‘ я наконец-то 🤩🤩 снова устроил для себя тот распорядок дня, который мне больше всего подходит. сегодня уже попробовал его в деле… и правда, идеально. как раньше. утром закончил с английским, сейчас читаю «принца полукровку», вечером немного потренируюсь, дальше могу выбирать между сериалом и книгой. в книге приблизился к хогвартским делам. каждый раз в воодушевлении читаю это все. как же нереально круто и…
❤43custom 525390226047110952320custom 525347482962077825117
как отец двух ангелочков - очень горжусь ими 🤞🏻
custom 525390226047110952353❤21custom 525347482962077825118
Кит Коннор получил роль циклопа в киновселенной marvel !!!!! фильм «люди Икс» находится в разработке. он сыграет скотта саммерса, лидера команды мутантов и возлюбленного джин грей, которую играет Сэди Синк!!!
custom 525390226047110952360❤32custom 525347482962077825122
★! зарубежные обложки «harry potter and the half-blood prince» давно не было этой «традиции»! мне нравятся все, где передан мрак сюжета в части. а вам?
❤65custom 525347482962077825126custom 525390226047110952322
наблюдать за небом во время грозы и сильного ветра - лучшая медитация. ࿐ если бы еще получалось запечатлеть молнии на фотографиях. (молнии - что-то невозможное. их форма, цвет.. крейзи) ⚡ 🌟🌟
custom 525390226047110952399custom 525347482962077825140❤35
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @luksbo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“парень из книги 🕯” (@luksbo), 2,673 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luksbo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.