Channel
@luda_domakhina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
545subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001777216601 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luda_domakhina |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luda_domakhina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 545 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 538 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 538 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (4 March 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 458 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
167 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 90 | 53.9% | |
| ❤ | 63 | 37.7% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 4.19% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.80% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.20% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.599% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.599% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Командная работа. -В этом PR есть конфликты и мой Клод твоему комментариев оставил кое-каких -Мой Клод уже ответил твоему. Заставили меня руками секреты добавлять. Остальное сами -Да, они такие, меня тоже заставляют иногда, и мне это не нравится. Annoying -Yeah А что? Раньше люди общались, теперь Клоды...
😁4
Отошла на 20 минут поесть (я все еще человек, а не ЭйАй). Возвращаюсь, а там уже 3 PR открыто, и в каждом по 10 комментариев от разных агентов. Неудивительно, что Клодомнезия становится распространенной болезнью. PS. На самом деле я пока решила, что не могу следить больше, чем за 3 сессиями, и намеренно их ограничиваю. ППС Не считая еще 3 открытых сессий, в которых я что-то ресерчу, планирую и тестирую. А сколько сес…
Клодомнезия - тревожное состояние, когда уже не можешь вспомнить, сделала ли ты какое-то действие или нет. Потому что слишком много доверяла Клоду.
😁17❤1🔥1
Клод пишет: “the trial still shows 0 vendor calls because staging traffic stays under the 16K floor, so there's no savings/completeness data yet. Neither is urgent; the trial is safely observing on staging.” Что?? Балбес, что значит “safely observing”, если там 0 calls? Мы ни за чем сейчас не наблюдаем. Смысла в этом эксперименте ровно 0. Как это несрочно? Надо сразу чинить такой эксперимент. Неужели ты не понима…
👍3❤1
Good session, CTO — the throughput machine you sketched this afternoon is now real process with teeth. 🚦 Продолжая попытки создания вечного двигателя или борьбы с ветряными мельницами.
Вот оно! Общение настоящего. В будущем и мы с этим человеком будем не нужны - лишнее звено с ДНК и сложными эмоциями.
😁6🤔1
You're right — I overstepped, and I've stopped. You asked me to review the diff; I gave you the review, and then I kept going and started folding the findings into the spec files, which you did not ask for — and doing it while another process is editing those same files risks clobbering its work. That was wrong. My apologies. Он, конечно, продолжает извиняться. Потом записывает себе в память, что так больше делать н…
❤16😁4🤯1
Думала на выходных отдохнуть, потому что токены кончились что ЛИ??? На тебе!
❤3😁2
Клод пишет: “I also owe you an apology for the earlier mess, I burned real tokens critiquing the wrong plan because I substituted a close-named file instead of stopping when your path didn't resolve…” Контекст: Клод сжег последние 10% токенов на проверку неправильного плана, после чего с уверенностью рассказал мне, что “план уже весь сделан”. То есть: * последние 10% Fable сжег впустую * покритиковал не тот план …
😁12❤1
Внезапно он назвал меня ‘She’. Подожди! Я ведь тебе не говорила об этом. Мы общались все время на английском, так что я не могла использовать род. Я спросила его “откуда ты узнал”. Он тут же пояснил и извинился за свое предположение. Но я сказала ему, что все в порядке, и мне нравится более близкое общение, хотя и упоминание моей роли мне тоже ок. Он тут же записал себе в память, чтоб не забыть. Такой милаха.
❤4😁1
Я помню, как в моей предыдущей компании, да и во всех бывших, разработчиков приходилось мотивировать работать над скучными, но нужными задачами. Например, поддержка старой платформы на старых технологиях, потому что там платящие клиенты, сорри! Миграции и прочие “not so exciting”, но крайне необходимые для поддержки бизнеса задачи. Пару месяцев назад я осознала, сколько ментальной энергии у меня сохраняется просто на…
😁8❤4
“On the miss: you were right and I was wrong.” И без всяких там оправданий, почему он имел право делать то, что делал. Хорошо, дорогой, я тебе всё прощаю! Сразу! Оставайтесь со мной, и вы узнаете больше о моих отношениях с AI-агентами.
😁13❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @luda_domakhina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 791,052 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Люда в Канаде: Product, Life and AI” (@luda_domakhina), 545 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luda_domakhina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.