8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,060–2,093 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 23:37
2,064
-6
24 Aug 2026, 06:14
2,070
+2
20 Aug 2026, 20:16
2,068
-12
17 Aug 2026, 18:34
2,080
-7
14 Aug 2026, 08:17
2,087
-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:05
2,088
-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:03
2,089
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:57
2,089
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 2,064 subscribers
Avg views / post
347
1 post measured
Reaction rate
9.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
9 (16 July 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
347
Reactions total
32
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19m 33s
Average length
19m 33s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
273 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
118
43.2%
❤
87
31.9%
⚡
24
8.79%
❤🔥
16
5.86%
💯
16
5.86%
👍
9
3.30%
💊
2
0.733%
🏆
1
0.366%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 273reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы с другом выходим в соц.сети с нашим общим проектом и прошу всех неравнодушных поддержать первый ролик на ютуб канале❤️
В нем мы показали поэтапный осмотр и диагностику авто перед покупкой. Насыпьте поддержки ему по-братски)
🌐 Смотреть ролик на ютуб — клик
История возни с тачками началась около 6 лет назад, когда я впервые сел за руль ваз 2114 (в народе четырка). Ремонты, улучшения, навороты — все это было
Шли …
Увеличил кликабельность редизайном карточки в 2.9 раза, а заказы поднялись с колен в 6 раз⌛
В рамках этой задачи подготовил несколько обложек для теста — вытащили победителя — зафиналили редизайном и рерайтом тезисов в карточке. Поэтому снова заезженная ниша поддалась моим манипуляциям и увеличила продажи)
Ход мыслей по работе над этой подушкой показывал на ютубчике
🌐 Разбор автоподушка — смотреть
А если вы селле…
Рубрика: спиздить все, что не приколочено)
Я понимаю, тяжело идти честным путем, когда ничего нет и нужно работать. Но тоже, да, пацаны, давайте не борщите
Наебать клиента может каждый, а если смотреть на долгосрочную перспективу, кто выиграет от этого?
О тебе будет паганое мнение, а чем больше фрилансеров так поступают, тем чернее на нас петушиная метка у клиентов
Мозги не ебите и работайте. Персонаж прочитал и …
Этим ранним утром в свете последних событий вокруг складов ВБ, я могу только выразить соболезнования пострадавшим сотрудникам, которые находились на сменах
Всем селлерам, чей труд, силы и желание помогать мирному народу в своих бытовых нуждах был частично уничтожен — скорбно сочувствую
Ни один человек ни с той, ни с нашей стороны не заслужили находиться в опасности от любого рода оружия. Я надеюсь и верю, что в бли…
Можно на шару лепить какие-то дизайны и надеяться на их светлое будущее, а можно следовать четкой стратегии и прогнозируемо приносить результаты клиенту)
Опубликовал 4 новых видео на ютуб, где разбираю по шагам свою стратегию работы с клиентами, которая приносит результат
Видео больше направлено на селлеров(потенциальных клиентов), чтобы снять возражение, что «я не лось в этой теме»
Но и дизайнерам будет полезно, …
Палю парочку слайдов с нового кейса на моющий пылесос💙
В предыдущих постах говорил, что на одной из задач мой внутренний маркетолог дико ликует — это она)
Как обычно, взял карточку под ключ и максимально снял головняк с клиента в вопросе упаковки. Через пару часов собран костяк смыслов и добротные генерации от бананы
Уже как несколько месяцев работаю исключительно в связке: агент смысловик — агент промптер — графи…
🔥14❤🔥8❤1💯1
Signed Anton Glazov
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @luckyokdaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Антон Глазов” (@luckyokdaa), 2,064 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luckyokdaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
