Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for luckshury flow

Channel

luckshury flow

@luckshuryofficial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,761subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002420159191
TypeChannel
Username@luckshuryofficial
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/luckshuryofficial

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7611,7711,7667 August 2026 — 1,768 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,768 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,766 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,770 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,771 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,770 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,769 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,766 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,763 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,762 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,763 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,761 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,760–1,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 06:171,761-2
12 Sept 2026, 08:571,763+1
8 Sept 2026, 15:221,762-1
3 Sept 2026, 00:271,763-3
30 Aug 2026, 12:391,766-3
24 Aug 2026, 08:421,769-1
20 Aug 2026, 20:121,770-1
17 Aug 2026, 16:081,771+1
14 Aug 2026, 17:151,770+4
11 Aug 2026, 13:051,766-2
7 Aug 2026, 16:171,768no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:091,768first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

908 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
53358.7%
🔥22024.2%
👍9110.0%
💯121.32%
👀101.10%
80.881%
🫡80.881%
👌70.771%
🤔70.771%
🎉40.441%
🤷‍♂20.22%
🏆10.11%
💋10.11%
🤪10.11%
🤯10.11%
🤷10.11%
🥴10.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 908 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2025 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jun 2026, 19:31 UTC≈1,250 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

really good site to compare cost/speed/liquidity for the venue in which you trade https://latency.perps.trading/

26💋1

25 Apr 2026, 21:28 UTC≈2,450 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

bearish CVD through the eyes of the footprint keep in mind I primarily use Hyperliquid for data, will cover why at another point.

🔥32🫡8👍52

18 Apr 2026, 12:19 UTC≈3,070 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

5d vs 60d ATR , a good way to measure regime/volatility shifts

29🤔7🤷‍♂2🤪1🤯1🤷1

2 Apr 2026, 15:15 UTC≈3,710 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

As markets slowly shift to become 24/7 365, you will start to see books rebalancing shift from traditional close time to daily open hours. Something Ive been noticing in BTC for a while. Meaning predicitable thin zones at the daily open.

29👍19

2 Apr 2026, 07:05 UTC≈3,150 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

When I see a news event push price convincingly beyond its intra session ATR, there becomes opportunity to look for mean reversion plays. Trump speaks - price dumps beyond session ATR - look for clustering, liquidations etc for mean reversion opportunity. Just dumping my thoughts here for you all.

38🔥14👍9👌1

24 Mar 2026, 15:52 UTC≈2,610 views78 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Your goal should be to survive long enough to see your big winners compound. Most fail because they are unable to CONSISTENTLY keep their losses small.

🔥4218💯10👍8

22 Mar 2026, 19:28 UTC≈2,660 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

just wait for a session high to break whilst its one time framing down like this, no need to try get into any major positioning.

55🔥12👍7

21 Mar 2026, 14:30 UTC≈2,310 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Friday afternoon from 2pm (UTC) onwards is such a good time to look for reversions to take place.

🔥26

19 Mar 2026, 16:52 UTC≈2,310 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

v good example of aggressive buying being absorbed by limit sells.

22🔥5

19 Mar 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,970 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

for those interested heres my ltf execution layout. • absorption zones • footprint • cvd divergences https://app.mmt.gg/l/UAFgoNRc

18🔥5👍4

18 Mar 2026, 14:22 UTC≈1,740 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Always think about how you are going to take advantage of something the market has not priced in yet.

24

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @luckshuryofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“luckshury flow” (@luckshuryofficial), 1,761 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luckshuryofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.