💬 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 引用推文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:引用推文 当前作者:CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz\\\_binance) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ A good wallet should filter these poison addresses out. 💬 引用原文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚨 ALERT: A user lost $100K after copying a poisoned wallet address from their transaction history instead of double\\\\-checking it, per Lookonchain. Always make sure to verify the full address before sending your funds. …

Channel
重要推文 @luckcoin
@luckcoin2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004347774425 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luckcoin2 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 13 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luckcoin2 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 4 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 58.8%
- avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.4
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 47 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
💬 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 引用推文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:引用推文 当前作者:Yi He (@heyibinance) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ We're standing together with Colombia. 💁♀️ 💬 引用原文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ In response to the devastating earthquake impacting Colombia, \\\\#Binance Charity is donating 650,000 dollars in 20 USDT vouchers to help Binance users living in the affected areas and waiving P2P fees until August 18, 2026 \\\\(23:59 UTC…
🔄 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 转推 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:转发推文 当前作者:CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz\\\_binance) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ RT @Cointelegraph: 🔥 JUST IN: Binance bStocks has overtaken xStocks to become the second\\\\-largest tokenized stock issuer, with $610.6M in va… 🔄 转推原文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 JUST IN: Binance bStocks has overtaken xStocks to become the second\\\\-largest tokenized stock issuer, with $610.6M in value. Ondo …
🔄 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 转推 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:转发推文 当前作者:CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz\\\_binance) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ RT @binancezh: 🚀 币安已扩大bStocks代币化证券获取渠道 第三方代币化证券,也能直接兑换 bStocks : ✅ 直接充值第三方代币化证券至币安现货钱包 ✅ 1:1 兑换为对应 bStocks,活动期间免手续费 ✅ 兑换后可享 7×24 小时交易、提现及… 🔄 转推原文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 币安已扩大bStocks代币化证券获取渠道 第三方代币化证券,也能直接兑换 bStocks : ✅ 直接充值第三方代币化证券至币安现货钱包 ✅ 1:1 兑换为对应 bStocks,活动期间免手续费 ✅ 兑换后可享 7×24 小时交易、提现及赎回 ⏰ 免手续费兑换至 8…
💬 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 引用推文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:引用推文 当前作者:CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz\\\_binance) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ We pray for Columbia🇨🇴🙏 💬 引用原文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ In response to the devastating earthquake impacting Colombia, \\\\#Binance Charity is donating 650,000 dollars in 20 USDT vouchers to help Binance users living in the affected areas and waiving P2P fees until August 18, 2026 \\\\(23:59 UTC \\\\-3\\\\). …
🆕 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 发布新推文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:原创推文 当前作者:CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz\\\_binance) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ @0xMoon @JACKET\\\_CTO AI is crazy now. This photo is AI generated. 查看推文
🆕 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 发布新推文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:原创推文 当前作者:CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz\\\_binance) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ @OdailyChina @bstocksfinance 5年了吧?😆 查看推文
🆕 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 发布新推文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:原创推文 当前作者:CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz\\\_binance) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ @bstocksfinance Slowly, but surely\\\\! 😆 Some things just take time, but inevitable. 查看推文
🆕 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 发布新推文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:原创推文 当前作者:币安Binance华语 (@binancezh) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 币安已扩大bStocks代币化证券获取渠道 第三方代币化证券,也能直接兑换 bStocks : ✅ 直接充值第三方代币化证券至币安现货钱包 ✅ 1:1 兑换为对应 bStocks,活动期间免手续费 ✅ 兑换后可享 7×24 小时交易、提现及赎回 ⏰ 免手续费兑换至 8 月 27 日 07:59(UTC\\\\+8) 了解更多👇 https://t.co/gZe9AMB46x 查看推文
🆕 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 发布新推文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:原创推文 当前作者:BNB Chain (@BNBCHAIN) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ @AltanaNetwork 🤝 查看推文
🆕 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 发布新推文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:原创推文 当前作者:BNB Chain (@BNBCHAIN) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ These upgrades all point in one direction: giving builders more control over how their agents are built, tested, paid and managed. Read the full blog for the complete breakdown 👇 https://t.co/0eYW7VeN6m 查看推文
🆕 Twitter 原始推文预警 \\\\| 发布新推文 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 推文标识:原创推文 当前作者:BNB Chain (@BNBCHAIN) 📝 当前内容 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Agent wallets previously had one setup through @TrustWallet AgentKit. Now builders have a second option with @AltanaNetwork, where you keep control of the keys while setting onchain limits for spending, approved addresses and time. More control over exactly what your agent can do. 查看推文
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @luckcoin2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 541,621 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@luckcoin2 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“重要推文 @luckcoin” (@luckcoin2), 4 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luckcoin2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.