Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 59 days, net -1,685. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,562–26,753 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 01:41
24,815
-183
28 Sept 2026, 00:59
24,998
-308
17 Sept 2026, 15:19
25,306
-45
15 Sept 2026, 10:38
25,351
-12
13 Sept 2026, 21:19
25,363
-55
12 Sept 2026, 02:38
25,418
-75
9 Sept 2026, 16:39
25,493
-92
6 Sept 2026, 07:19
25,585
-69
3 Sept 2026, 23:20
25,654
-49
2 Sept 2026, 11:06
25,703
-36
1 Sept 2026, 10:12
25,739
-19
31 Aug 2026, 07:57
25,758
-39
30 Aug 2026, 06:56
25,797
-28
29 Aug 2026, 06:34
25,825
-35
28 Aug 2026, 03:07
25,860
-11
27 Aug 2026, 01:14
25,871
-31
26 Aug 2026, 01:53
25,902
-12
25 Aug 2026, 03:48
25,914
-60
24 Aug 2026, 01:25
25,974
-66
22 Aug 2026, 06:13
26,040
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 3 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,800
Videos
≈6
Links
≈5,670
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
33 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
28
84.8%
👍
3
9.09%
👎
1
3.03%
🤔
1
3.03%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @luca900. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PGPLAY999 (แจ้งข่าวสาร) @pgplay_999 · 33,172 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 4 September 2026
𝓗𝓨𝓓𝓡𝓐𝟏𝟐𝟑+ @LUCABET123P · 34,607 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 September 2026
SETTHEE900 OFFICIAL @SETTHEE900 · 21,389 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 22 September 2026
CONFIRM789 @confirm789 · 30,652 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 7 September 2026
WIN99PLUS มั่นคง โอนไว ❗️ ❗️ @win99plus · 19,769 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 29 September 2026
123 STARBET @lavaslot · 36,677 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐙𝐈𝐋 𝟐𝟒𝐇 @brazil24h · 18,758 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 4 October 2026
𝐁𝐔𝐍𝐍𝐘𝟏𝟐𝟑 @addbunny123 · 40,410 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 September 2026
lava345 แตกจริงถอนจริง @lava345 · 24,730 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 September 2026
NEKO 777 @NEKO777G · 40,910 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 4 September 2026
𝐏𝐎𝐈𝐏𝐄𝐓𝟏𝟐𝟑 @poipet123s · 29,273 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
WINK488PLUS @wink488plus · 103,698 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
PGSOFT WALLET @PGSOFTWALLET · 39,536 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 4 September 2026
G4X @rc9bet · 23,303 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“กลุ่มลับฉบับ FARO168” (@luca900), 24,815 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luca900.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.