6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,505–3,530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 00:22
3,508
-16
11 Aug 2026, 23:42
3,524
-3
9 Aug 2026, 07:54
3,527
+3
6 Aug 2026, 06:31
3,524
+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:35
3,523
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:34
3,523
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
31.1%
avg views ÷ 3,508 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (25 March 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
2,180
Reactions total
51
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
475 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
214
45.1%
👍
99
20.8%
🔥
61
12.8%
👌
36
7.58%
😢
19
4.00%
🤝
15
3.16%
❤🔥
9
1.89%
😐
6
1.26%
💋
3
0.632%
😁
3
0.632%
👏
2
0.421%
💯
2
0.421%
🙏
2
0.421%
😱
1
0.211%
🤓
1
0.211%
🥰
1
0.211%
🥱
1
0.211%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 475reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ltvpnnews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
UPD: На сайте и в Telegram боте добавили предупреждения для локаций, которые сейчас могут быть недоступны на территории РФ. Это позволит заранее увидеть возможные проблемы перед созданием конфигурации.
Также добавили еще четыре новые локации:
🇺🇸 США #2
🇫🇷 Франция #5
🇳🇱 Нидерланды #5
🇳🇱 Нидерланды #6
Продолжаем расширять инфраструктуру.
⚠️ Масштабные проблемы с доступностью VPN в России
За последнее время РКН значительно усилил блокировки IP адресов. В результате большая часть VPN сервисов на территории РФ полностью или частично перестала работать. К сожалению, ограничения затронули и часть серверов LTVPN.
Мы уже начали заменять недоступные узлы и добавили новые локации:
🇫🇮 Финляндия #3
🇫🇮 Финляндия #4
🇫🇷 Франция #4
🇨🇭 Швейцария
🇩🇪 Германия #4
На…
🚀 Уважаемые пользователи!
13 мая мы уже проводили опрос по качеству работы LTVPN, и сейчас вновь хотим собрать вашу обратную связь, чтобы узнать, насколько стабильно работает сервис и насколько удобно вам им пользоваться.
📌 Пройти опрос можно здесь: https://vote.ltvpn.org/
⏱ Заполнение займет не более 5 минут, а ваши ответы помогут нам точнее определить приоритеты и продолжать улучшать инфраструктуру и функции сер…
🚀 Обновление LTVPN: новые возможности для личных и общих серверов
Мы выпустили новое обновление, которое затронуло личные серверы, общие локации и добавило новый формат использования нашей панели управления.
🖥 Личные серверы:
На всех личных серверах было установлено новое обновление.
Что изменилось:
- Добавлена возможность настраивать некоторые протоколы по отдельности
- Теперь можно менять SNI и Fingerprint для о…
🚀 Одно из крупнейших обновлений LTVPN за последнее время
Последние несколько месяцев мы активно работали над обновлением сервиса и сегодня готовы показать результат.
🌐 Новый основной домен:
Теперь основным доменом проекта становится getltvpn.com. В ближайшее время на него будут постепенно перенесены все основные сервисы LTVPN. Старые домены продолжат работать в качестве переходника на основной домен.
🎨 Полностью н…
⚠️ Важная информация о тарифах
С 3 июня 2026 года в LTVPN вступят в силу новые цены на конфигурации в общих серверах.
За последние полтора года стоимость наших услуг оставалась неизменной, несмотря на рост расходов на серверы и развитие инфраструктуры. Последнее изменение цен произошло еще с 1 января 2025 года: https://t.me/ltvpnnews/53
🔔 Новые тарифы:
1 неделя — 30 ₽
1 месяц — 100 ₽
3 месяца — 250 ₽
6 месяцев — 4…
😱 В данный момент нами зафиксированы масштабные DDoS атаки на всю инфраструктуру LTVPN, включая VPN серверы и все сайты проекта.
Часть сервиса может работать нестабильно или быть временно недоступна.
🔧 Специалисты уже занимаются решением данного инцидента.
Также за последние сутки удалось выяснить несколько важных моментов:
В РФ начали массово блокировать подключения VLESS на уровне ТСПУ. Не везде еще обновили ТСПУ…
⚠️ Проблема с доступностью VPN сервиса постепенно решается и у многих пользователей работа уже восстановлена.
Что было сделано:
— В локации «все локации» были добавлены новые протоколы: Shadowsocks, Trojan и XHTTP для более широкого покрытия и обхода ограничений.
— Также была исправлена и дополнительно оптимизирована работа Hysteria2.
В чем была проблема?
Точного ответа найти так и не удалось. Предположительно, либ…
⚠️ На данный момент наблюдаются проблемы с доступностью VPN сервисов. По предварительной информации, проблема затрагивает не только нас, но и как минимум еще один крупный VPN сервис.
Причины на текущий момент неизвестны. Мы уже занимаемся диагностикой и проверяем все возможные варианты, чтобы как можно быстрее восстановить стабильную работу.
Спасибо за понимание. О любых изменениях будем сообщать дополнительно.
UP…
🙃 Работа сервисов полностью восстановлена
Все системы проекта были успешно восстановлены и запущены. Сайты, панели личных серверов, телеграмм боты и остальные сервисы работают в штатном режиме.
Перенос на резервную инфраструктуру завершен, проверка стабильности также выполнена, на данный момент сервисы доступны и функционируют корректно. Всем активным VPN услугам автоматически начислено +7 дней в качестве компенсац…
😉 Технические неполадки в дата-центре
В дата-центре, где размещена часть нашей инфраструктуры, произошли внезапные проблемы с сетевым оборудованием. В результате наблюдается полная недоступность сайтов (включая панели личных серверов) и телеграмм ботов.
Специалисты дата-центра уже работают над устранением неисправности и восстановлением работы сети.
Следим за ситуацией и ожидаем восстановления сервисов после завер…
🚀 Уважаемые пользователи!
Мы запустили короткий опрос по качеству работы LTVPN, чтобы собрать реальную обратную связь по скорости, стабильности и удобству сервиса.
📌 Пройти опрос можно здесь: https://vote.ltvpn.org/
⏱ Заполнение займет не более 5 минут, но поможет нам точнее определить приоритеты и двигаться в правильном направлении при развитии инфраструктуры и функций.
Спасибо, что остаетесь с нами ❤️
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ltvpnnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🚀 Опрос по КД на пересоздание локаций
Сейчас действует КД на пересоздание локации (5 минут), а мы рассматриваем снижение до 2 минут, чтобы можно было быстрее менять сервер при необходимости. Хотим узнать ваше мнение. Снижаем КД до 2 минут?
Да80%
Нет5%
Сделать еще меньше (напишу в комментариях)6%
Оставить как есть9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 554,638 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LTVPN | Новостной канал” (@ltvpnnews), 3,508 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ltvpnnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.