Channel
@lstartalel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,555subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002104685921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lstartalel |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lstartalel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 3,555 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 3,559 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 3,559 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 45,538 |
| Reactions total | 396 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
396 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 307 | 77.5% | |
| 🙏 | 36 | 9.09% | |
| 👻 | 31 | 7.83% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 396reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lstartalel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://blog.naver.com/startale-/224371392414 중국의 주요 폴리실리콘 생산업체 8곳이 태양광 제품을 원가 기준 이하로 판매하지 않겠다는 공개 서약을 발표했다. 이는 이른바 ‘내권식(involution-style) 경쟁’, 즉 기업들이 과도한 가격 인하 경쟁에 몰두하면서 수익성이 악화되는 상황을 억제하고, 중국 태양광 공급망의 보다 건전한 가격 형성을 지원하기 위한 업계 차원의 새로운 조치라고 상하이증권보가 금요일 보도했다.
❤2
📖 섹션 232 원문 번역 링크 : https://naver.me/56X1cQZ7 - 오늘 발표된 섹션 232 전문 번역입니다. - 이번에 발표된 섹션 232는 우리나라 모든 태양광 밸류체인에 호재라고 생각합니다.
❤10
Video, posted without a caption
❤21
[Section 232 폴리실리콘 최종 발표] - MIP 확정: 폴리실리콘 $21/kg, 잉곳·웨이퍼 $100/kg, 셀 $0.22/W, 모듈 $0.38/W - 관세 15%: 원료 폴리실리콘은 제외되고 잉곳 및 파생제품에 15% 추가 관세 적용. 한국산은 기존 일반관세와 Section 232 관세를 합쳐 총 15%가 되도록 조정 - 시행일: 12월 4일. MIP와 관세 모두 적용
👍13
File, posted without a caption
❤9
📖 AM 08 :00 - 힘든 시장이기에 기회가 있는것 링크 : https://naver.me/FAACjW9C - AM / PM 시리즈는 매일 오전 혹은 오후에 발간되는 시장을 보면서 제 생각을 정리한 글입니다. 매일 발간되다보니 똑같은 말을 반복할 수도있습니다. 감안하셔서 읽어주시기를 부탁드립니다.
❤8
📖 화이트아웃 포트폴리오 - 마지막 총알을 쏘다 링크 : https://naver.me/54Kn06PT - 화이트아웃 포트폴리오는 1억으로 운영되는 가상의 포트폴리오입니다. 내일 편입으로 마지막 남은 현금을 전부 소진할 예정입니다. 글 참고 부탁드립니다.
❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6
Photo, posted without a caption
👍9
📖 오로라 -변화의 바람 링크 : https://naver.me/Fz85tNvT - 하반기에는 중소형주가 시장 수익률을 상회할 가능성이 높다고 생각합니다. 오로라의 사업이 변곡점에 진입하고 있는 만큼, 지금이 오로라를 본격적으로 팔로우하기에 적절한 시점이라고 판단합니다.
❤8
📖 26.08.01 화이트아웃 개인 세미나(요약 글 포함) 링크 : https://naver.me/FVFDNkL3 - 26.08.01에 진행한 개인 세미나입니다. 현재 시장에 대한 뷰와 앞으로 시장이 어떻게 될 것 같은지에 대한 의견을 나누어보았습니다. - 요약글도 함께 첨부했습니다.
❤6
한번 성공하는것 보다 꾸준한게 더 어렵다
👻31
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lstartalel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,047,318 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“스타테일 리서치” (@lstartalel), 3,555 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lstartalel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.