4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,422–2,435 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 02:33
2,433
+5
10 Aug 2026, 08:30
2,428
+3
7 Aug 2026, 14:40
2,425
+2
7 Aug 2026, 08:01
2,423
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
55.2%
avg views ÷ 2,433 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
19 (12 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
22,819
Reactions total
1,227
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,342 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5406904856868844146
534
39.8%
custom 5294362536026608748
333
24.8%
custom 5294388357369994667
268
20.0%
custom 5294020600795273009
134
9.99%
custom 5294230422832584711
73
5.44%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,342reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lspepic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✝️ Отсылки в треке «Воскресение»
У входа в бордель
Я, пьяный, искал свою щель
❤️ Оммаж на вступительную часть трека «Шест» в Magic City, показывающий, к чему привел образ жизни героя.
У входа в стрип-клуб
Я пускал клубы дыма и-и-и
Думал: «Что забыл внутри-и-и?»
Лужей мочи, уже трезвый почти, это место почтил
И, как Чёрный Плащ, исчезаю в ночи
😏 Чёрный Плащ — персонаж одноименного мультфильма об утке, которая боретс…
📼 Тринадцатая месячина 🎁
Подведем июльские итоги:
🟣 Оцифровали неизданные демки
🟣 Послушали новый трек «Лето»
🟣 Разыграли кассеты One More City
🟣 Поговорили о треке «Синее»
🟣 Выпустили новую главу Эпопеи Городов
🤪 На островке живут 2415 человек!
Друзья, месяц выдался очень крутым и насыщенным. Спасибо вам за ваши реакции, комментарии и поддержку — это бесценно.
В связи с небольшим уикендом я пропускаю свой первый …
Но я задрот и пожертвую постом,
черт с ним!
Хочется просто поговорить о книгах...
Наша основная рубрика Эпопеи Городов приближается к экватору альбома Tragic City, а это значит, что пора делиться фактами о нем.
📖 Tragic City многими считается не только лучшим альбомом ЛСП, но и одним из самых литературных на всей хип-хоп сцене. Этот тезис навязывается сам собой, ведь на обложке перед стенами Г…
Какие альтернативные версии треков вам понравились больше всего?
🃏 Парный дурак53%
♻️ У.У.У.33%
🔥 Цветная бумага21%
🏠 Один19%
🍷 Вспоминай28%
🖼 Не убежал18%
😱 Пьяндекс15%
The shares total 187%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
НОВЫЙ ТРЕК «ЛЕТО»
💗 Вот мы и дождались «Лето». Получился мелодичный меланхоличный тречок, занимающий достойное место рядом с предыдущими песнями, которые Олег выпускал к своему дню рождения. У них уже сформировалась общая нить умиротворенного настроения без надрывов и резкости.
☀️ А пока вы слушаете, я побурчу о смыслах. Основная тема трека — последнее лето. В нашем случае оно и первое тоже. Поле это достаточно про…
Пьяндекс (ft. молодой калуга & CODE80)
😤 С чего бы начать... Это так называемый ремикс трека «Пьяндекс», созданный молодым калугой и CODE80. Последнего вы могли слышать в недавнем релизе «Lonely». Сниппет был показан еще в декабря прошлого года, и сейчас трек эксклюзивно поместили в конец новой кассеты альбома «Судный день».
🚬 Помню, как Олег раньше рыгал в Periscope, вот этот ремикс вернул меня в те времена, потом…
Новый трек «Лето»
💄 24 июля 2026 💄
🌟 Олег анонсировал эту песню еще 11 июля на фестивале «Атланта», где признался, что просто не успел ее выложить. Вероятно, по сложившейся традиции она должна была выйти в его день рождения, как было с «Джекпот» и «Лети», но ребята где-то забуксовали.
💜 Обложку нарисовала, конечно же, наша любимая Лиза. Разглядываем и ждем трек!
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lspepic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие альтернативные версии треков вам понравились больше всего?
🃏 Парный дурак53%
♻️ У.У.У.33%
🔥 Цветная бумага21%
🏠 Один19%
🍷 Вспоминай28%
🖼 Не убежал18%
😱 Пьяндекс15%
The shares total 187%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 339,217 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эпопея ЛСП 🐷” (@lspepic), 2,433 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lspepic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
