Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 广州佛山修车司机协会报告榜

Channel

广州佛山修车司机协会报告榜

@lsjxh2

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

23,608subscribers

+1,413 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002265839040
TypeChannel
Username@lsjxh2
Description修车协会,群友互助! 修车司机协会: @lsjxh1 协会验证资源榜: @lsjxh9 协会动态资源榜:@sjxh8 协会吃瓜新闻: @lsjxh4 上榜联系: @xhxzl1_bot
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lsjxh2

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bounsburst008/68292 Sept 2026, 10:35 UTC@lsjxh2/4811 · this entry2 Sept 2026, 10:35 UTC1.00under a minute
@bounsburst008/71354 Oct 2026, 08:59 UTC@lsjxh2/4953 · this entry4 Oct 2026, 08:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@bounsburst008/71628 Oct 2026, 04:15 UTC@lsjxh2/4962 · this entry8 Oct 2026, 04:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@bounsburst008/721913 Oct 2026, 12:20 UTC@lsjxh2/4998 · this entry13 Oct 2026, 12:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@bounsburst008/75009 Nov 2026, 21:33 UTC@lsjxh2/5121 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 21:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@bounsburst008/752510 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC@lsjxh2/5124 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bounsburst0086 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@bounsburst008 (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 92 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

21,70623,60822,6576 August 202613 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 99 days, net +1,413. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,421–23,893 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 13:1823,608+115
11 Nov 2026, 01:5923,493+614
9 Nov 2026, 09:0822,879+34
7 Nov 2026, 21:1522,845-83
6 Nov 2026, 17:2622,928-135
5 Nov 2026, 15:5723,063-488
4 Nov 2026, 13:5923,551-22
3 Nov 2026, 14:0623,573-10
2 Nov 2026, 16:1023,583-15
1 Nov 2026, 15:3423,598+43
31 Oct 2026, 14:2823,555+21
30 Oct 2026, 14:2623,534+9
29 Oct 2026, 16:1523,525+118
28 Oct 2026, 13:1623,407-27
27 Oct 2026, 12:3523,434+203
26 Oct 2026, 12:4623,231+331
25 Oct 2026, 14:1422,900+73
24 Oct 2026, 13:4922,827+206
23 Oct 2026, 11:5622,621+12
22 Oct 2026, 09:2022,609first reading

Engagement

190 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 122 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.51%
avg views ÷ 23,608 subscribers
Avg views / post
592
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.119%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 190 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held190 (28 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total18,948
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈152
Videos
≈4
Links
≈1,830

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 24 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2996.7%
👏13.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 190 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 60 posts held from the last 30 days (3.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC7 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

21- 泡椒蒸粉肠[+0] 🉐: 80优惠券 22- Julia Re[+0] 🉐: 30优惠券 23- prince j[+0] 🉐: 30优惠券 24- plutin 无[+0] 🉐: 半价优惠券 25- mo boy[+0] 🉐: 80优惠券 26- Zeno Daw[+0] 🉐: 80优惠券 27- 被生活调成M ([+0] 🉐: 50优惠券 28- Cappu ha[+0] 🉐: 50优惠券 29- 兰博[+0] 🉐: 80优惠券 30- bee put[+0] 🉐: 50优惠券 31- 霓虹马枪射穿对面[+0] 🉐: 30优惠券

13 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC5 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🎉💐🎉Winner Winner🎉💐🎉 花都栖云阁携手广佛修车司机协会抽奖活动(@Cc8888001) ①本次活动由白晶晶本人赞助 ②兑奖联系:@Cc8888001 ③开奖日起奖品有效期7天 ④中奖不可以有偿转让 ⑤出击后必须提交报告到:@xhxzl1_bot 🎫参与人数: 37|号码总数: 202 🔖中奖名单如下: 1- 龙威 八方来财[+45] 🉐: 80优惠券 2- 昂鸠鸠 (😮‍💨[+120] 🉐: 80优惠券 3- 罗翔 (法外狂徒[+0] 🉐: 50优惠券 4- Kian War[+0] 🉐: 30优惠券 5- Miro Lan[+0] 🉐: 30优惠券 6- Vito Ree[+0] 🉐: 50优惠券 7- Tavi Hud[+0] 🉐: 30优惠券 8- li xiaom[+0] 🉐: 50优惠券 9- 猛攻 哥[+0] 🉐: 50优惠券 10- Sora Sha[+0] 🉐: 50优惠券 11- sere…

10 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC117 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🎰天河花店老板娘携手广佛修车司机协会抽奖活动(@huals88) 🎁奖品如下: 1p优惠券200 x 8 2p优惠券300 x 8 包夜优惠券500 x 8 10元口令红包🧧 x 1 🎟参加条件: 加入-广州佛山修车司机协会 加入-广州佛山修车司机协会验证榜 加入-广州佛山修车司机协会报告榜 加入-广州佛山司机协会资源动态榜 加入-广州04年花店老板娘38D🌹 🌕参加消耗:0修车值 ➕加权消耗:10修车值/次 上限10次|每次加15 此活动可消耗修车值增加中奖率,点击参加按钮操作! 📝抽奖说明: ①本次活动由老板娘本人赞助 ②兑奖联系:@huals88 ③开奖日起奖品有效期7天 ④中奖不可以有偿转让 ⑤出击后必须提交报告到:@xhxzl1_bot ⏰开奖时间: 2026-11-13 21:30:00

10 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC692 viewsread 13 November 2026

【出车报告】:https://t.me/lsjxh1 【所在位置】天河 【老师艺名】椰椰 【联系方式】 @yeye03520 【验证留名】尼玛 【验证时间】11/8 【出车价位】1600 【颜值身材】满分 【服务内容】课表 【服务态度】满分 【优点缺点】配合高 【推荐程度】满分 【体验细节】约好时间 直接吃完饭就可以去了,很开心。很熟悉的小区,遥控上门,先电梯后走楼梯,安全私密。推门进去,老师在门后等着,看见真人着实是十分欢喜,照片是所见即所得,肤白貌美,温柔可爱,很健康有福相,她说其他狼友说她有旺夫相。温柔的招呼我在沙发上坐下,给我递水,坐着闲聊几句,然后她就先脱衣服,去浴室放热水,我随即也脱了衣服跟着进浴室,真切看到小熊的身材,确实是比例协调,有胸有屁股,皮肤滑嫩,胸型挺拔,这我哪顶的住,帮忙擦洗的时候就很硬了。随后擦干去卧室,抱一会,然后她慢慢往下舔胸,口,很舒服,完全受不了啊,口了一会我感觉受不了,赶紧喊停,先做一次,我…

9 Nov 2026, 21:33 UTC171 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🎰花都栖云阁携手广佛修车司机协会抽奖活动(@Cc8888001) 🎁奖品如下: 半价优惠券 x 1 80优惠券 x 10 50优惠券 x 10 30优惠券 x 10 🎟参加条件: 加入-广州佛山修车司机协会 加入-广州佛山修车司机协会验证榜 加入-广州佛山修车司机协会报告榜 加入-广州佛山司机协会资源动态榜 加入-栖云阁·群聊 加入-栖云阁·瑶浴•SPA 🌕参加消耗:0修车值 ➕加权消耗:10修车值/次 上限10次|每次加15 此活动可消耗修车值增加中奖率,点击参加按钮操作! 📝抽奖说明: ①本次活动由白晶晶本人赞助 ②兑奖联系:@Cc8888001 ③开奖日起奖品有效期7天 ④中奖不可以有偿转让 ⑤出击后必须提交报告到:@xhxzl1_bot ⏰开奖时间: 2026-11-13 15:00:00

9 Nov 2026, 14:26 UTC374 viewsread 13 November 2026

【出车报告】:https://t.me/lsjxh1 【所在位置】天河棠下 【老师艺名】#金浪屿 #甜甜 【联系方式】@xixi3322 【验证留名】大队长 【验证时间】11.8 【出车价位】799 【颜值身材】8 【服务内容】剧本杀 【服务态度】9 【优点缺点】白云去天河距离太远了,地铁比较麻烦 【推荐程度】8 【体验细节】群里中了半价,所以来体验一下,也是第一次体验剧本杀,很新鲜很好奇,之前完全没有玩过进入先洗个澡,然后进去房间,房间布置的比较情趣,等了一会老师进来了,然后开始剧情,对第一次来体验的还是蛮友好。走完剧本流程就开始服务,我感觉是很新鲜刺激的,给的情绪价值还是很足后面手推顺利出水, 整体体验第1次感觉还是很刺激新鲜,老师很热情,非常不错的一次体验,加上老师介绍其他房间的剧情,让人很想来第2次 ❤️温馨提示:以上仅代表个人体验,报告仅供参考! ✍️报告提交点击:@xhxzl1_bot

9 Nov 2026, 13:05 UTC338 viewsread 13 November 2026

【出车报告】:https://t.me/lsjxh1 【所在位置】天河 【老师艺名】小蜜桃 【联系方式】@Xmtxmt8 【验证留名】大叔 【验证时间】11.9 【出车价位】800 【颜值身材】身材完美 【服务内容】和课表一样 【服务态度】情绪价值拉满 【优点缺点】活真的很好 【推荐程度】10分 【体验细节】老师遥控到教室,进门一看,可以,服务系御姐,洗澡洗干净洗香香,特别是后面,老师很认真的洗,毕竟等下要服务,乖乖躺下趴好,前戏调情服务开始,老师用她的大奶子从小腿甩到了脖子上,舒服,鸡鸡慢慢硬了起来,顶着床很难受,然后老师继续用舌头舔到我屁股,不愧是服务系老师,鸡鸡越舔越来劲,没想到老师还继续,口含一口水在我背后叽里咕噜的过来过去的,有点厉害的,最后上重头戏毒龙,体验真的超好,很舒服,立马转身换正面服务,继续舔,她含了一口温水,直接奔着二弟去了。好家伙,瞬间一股暖流由下而上,口了挺长一段时间,而且都是深喉,我怕出的太快立马叫唤…

Showing the 12 most recent of 190 posts we hold for @lsjxh2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 29 posts on @lsjxh2 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
11

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“广州佛山修车司机协会报告榜” (@lsjxh2), 23,608 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lsjxh2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.