Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

lozxxxxx

@lozxxxxxxxx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

100subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002124232320
TypeChannel
Username@lozxxxxxxxx
DescriptionНа взлете я целую крест ☦️
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lozxxxxxxxx

Growth

1007 August 2026 — 100 subscribers9 August 2026 — 100 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 99–101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:46100no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:57100first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
169.1%
avg views ÷ 100 subscribers
Avg views / post
169
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held8 (12 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,184
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
157
Videos
131
Links
26

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2822.6%
🔥2520.2%
👏2217.7%
custom 53484580098969729472016.1%
custom 5427341054292554875118.87%
custom 5467503972082261359108.06%
custom 524249080294854778632.42%
❤‍🔥32.42%
custom 534827126901391076910.806%
custom 534837015634093325410.806%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC84 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52424908029485477863👏2custom 53484580098969729472

27 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC175 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Утренняя рыбалка это вайб 🐠

custom 53484580098969729478🔥6👏5

21 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC193 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @sashapopdailyPhoto

8 лет Амкалу ☺😍🥰

custom 54273410542925548757custom 53484580098969729476🔥5

20 Jul 2026, 01:30 UTC167 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Будущее футбола 😎🇪🇸

custom 54675039720822613595👏3🔥3

15 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC209 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Furia roja

custom 54675039720822613595🔥3custom 53484580098969729473

15 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC192 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎁На первых двух фото - мой тренер, ему реакций накидайте) На последнем фото - лучший президент в мфл, ему тоже реакций дайте )

12🔥8👏7custom 53482712690139107691custom 53483701563409332541custom 53484580098969729471custom 54273410542925548751

14 Jul 2026, 22:26 UTC164 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

8❤‍🔥3👏2

12 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC201 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @myachproPhoto

🎮 В Парке Горького вчера рубились в FIFA – турнир от доставки Пятёрочки! Играл в том числе Герман Эль Классико. Дальше можно не продолжать, но продолжим: он занял второе место 👏 @myachPRO

8👏3custom 54273410542925548753

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lozxxxxxxxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“lozxxxxx” (@lozxxxxxxxx), 100 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lozxxxxxxxx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.