Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Грязный ноукодер

Channel

Грязный ноукодер

@lowcodingdev

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,527subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001570299905
TypeChannel
Username@lowcodingdev
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lowcodingdev

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,4713,5273,4997 August 2026 — 3,516 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,513 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,509 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,500 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,499 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,495 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,496 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,492 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,490 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,476 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,471 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,527 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 41 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,463–3,535 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 13:573,527+56
13 Sept 2026, 12:003,471-5
9 Sept 2026, 19:573,476-14
29 Aug 2026, 11:253,490-2
26 Aug 2026, 09:243,492-4
23 Aug 2026, 12:483,496+1
19 Aug 2026, 14:343,495-4
16 Aug 2026, 19:243,499-1
13 Aug 2026, 05:543,500-9
10 Aug 2026, 10:533,509-4
7 Aug 2026, 21:013,513-3
7 Aug 2026, 07:463,516first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 10s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

234 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5021.4%
👎4720.1%
❤4418.8%
👍4318.4%
🗿218.97%
😁177.26%
❤‍🔥83.42%
🎃10.427%
👻10.427%
😱10.427%
🤷‍♂10.427%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lowcodingdev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 March 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC795 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вопрос к любителям Claude Code/Codex - а как вы хостите свои наработки? Я лично использую Claude Code чтобы писать код, который потом будет хоститься, использоваться в приложении клиента в вебе. Но я посмотрел несколько супер-гайдов и ни в одном не объясняется как нормально хостить фронт, на чем разворачивать бекенд и БД и тд. Неужели все разрабатывают и используют решения только локально?

😁10❤1🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTC944 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что ж, я скипнул изучение Python и линейной алгебры (оставим это дата аналитикам) и перешел к ИИ концептам. Основная информация пока что не является новой для меня, но прочитал про интересный подход к RAG системам, а именно генерацию гипотетического ответа на вопрос для дальнейшего поиска ответа в документах. Подход называется HyDE (Hypothetical Document Embeddings). Обычно сам вопрос к системе может быть плохим ил…

❤‍🔥8❤5

20 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC983 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я узнал, что последние два года появилась роль Forward Deployed Engineer, которая становится все более популярна в AI компаниях. Если коротко - это человек и пароход, который помогает внедрять продукт в компании клиентов и умеет как в техническую, так и в клиентскую составляющую. Пока я ищу работу, решил подучиться и подтянуть свои скиллы, чтобы соответствовать требованиям на эту роль. Основные пробелы у меня сейчас…

🔥17❤1

13 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC≈1,430 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Ищу работу Забил я делать свой стартап, хочется идти в контент и делать свое медиа с предсказанием будущего (а еще лучше свой Palantir), но жить на что-то надо. Поэтому этот пост про поиск работы) Если коротко о себе - я умный и ответственный парень, который может разобраться в чем угодно. Последние 2 года активно ковыряюсь в ИИ и его применении в автоматизации процессов и создании продуктов. Если у вас есть инте…

🗿9👍7❤5

3 Jul 2026, 03:41 UTC≈2,780 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как свино-качки Higgsfield обманывают вас Пару месяцев назад Хигсы развели меня на годовую подписку, обещая безлимитный Kling 3. Он был таковым в течении недели с ограничениями в 5 сек и 720р, но в итоге они просто убрали это совсем и ты ничего не можешь с этим поделать. Они продолжают заниматься таким маркетингом на выход новых моделей, поэтому заранее вам говорю - не ведитесь. Но речь не про это, а про их комьюн…

👍7❤2👎1

2 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC≈1,080 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ну и в догонку еще один тизер

👎7🔥3❤1😁1

2 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC≈1,060 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Короч Меня долго не было, потому что я работал над стартапом и там нельзя про него ничего рассказывать) Теперь эта история закончилась, а значит настало время вернуться. (надеюсь вы меня ждали) За последний год много что поменялось и мой стек с n8n+supabase+lovable немного перестал быть актуальным - теперь все можно делать на чистом коде, чатясь в claude code. А значит настало время закупиться тарифом побольше и …

👍8❤2🗿2

30 Jun 2026, 14:21 UTC994 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ладно, а если такой тизер к новому тулу, который я хочу сделать? Или тоже захейтите?)

👎10🔥9❤1👍1

5 Jun 2026, 10:29 UTC≈1,870 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Короче собираемся отлить на рекламу продукта $10k на этот ролик, что думаете?

👎28🗿8😁5❤1👍1🤷‍♂1😱1

2 Jun 2026, 07:51 UTC≈1,800 views18 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Это был тизер к возвращению в блог, кто не понял)) Сначала немного новостей: 1. Много работаю над стартапом и получается неплохо - мы сделали классный продукт с крутым дизайном и функционалом, в нем реально удобно создавать креативы любой сложности. Единственный минус, что особо распространяться пока нельзя, поэтому я ничего не писал в блог, хотя сделали много интересных технических решений. 2. Мне только что дали…

👍17❤1

2 Jun 2026, 03:55 UTC≈1,320 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lowcodingdev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Mar 2026, 16:13 UTCAnonymous Poll308 voters

Вопрос на засыпку

  1. Я использую OpenClaw/Claude Code и стал больше зарабатывать9%
  2. Я использую OpenClaw/Claude Code и стал больше работать28%
  3. Оба варианта9%
  4. Не использую54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

💎 Зерокодер | Нейросети и AI
@oqode · 39,526
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
Soonicorn jobs
@soonicornjobs · 30,321
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Грязный ноукодер” (@lowcodingdev), 3,527 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lowcodingdev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.