Channel
@lovestoothles
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
225subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002127964430 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lovestoothles |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lovestoothles |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 225 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 224 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (1 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 768 |
| Reactions total | 94 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
94 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5325596358541851673 | 43 | 45.7% | |
| custom 5328123564543455516 | 12 | 12.8% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5262642896875571458 | 6 | 6.38% | |
| custom 5465163700237254792 | 5 | 5.32% | |
| custom 5465480896456964763 | 5 | 5.32% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 5.32% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 5.32% | |
| custom 5278435251104796318 | 2 | 2.13% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lovestoothles. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем привет, сегодня я побывала в музее, повидалась со своим другом, погуляла там и в общем классно провела время, но сувениры не взяла :( На этом как бы всё, я ещё много штор фоткала, больно они мне понравились
❤5
Ребят, сегодня арта не будет, могу отправить фотки с музея ^^ Жаль что отписки всё...
Проверяю Ваш актив, кстати, в последнее время Вы очень активны и я это очень ценю ❤
custom 53255963585418516737custom 54654808964569647631
Как Вы думаете лучше добавлять на фон картинку из интернета или рисовать самой? Как Вам больше нравится? Адель решила идти в магазин, тем временем то что происходит дома, главное пока что Сырни это не видно ^^ Если что пожар потушили ;) #арт #Сирни #мой_75 #Блекси #Евлалия #Сева
custom 53255963585418516736💘3custom 52784352511047963182custom 52626428968755714581
Чистка Так, ребятки, думаю надо провести проверку актива, понимаю у кого может не работать тг, но даю возможность до 11 августа ( может и больше времени дам ) Если Вы не напишете под комментарием хоть что-то, то мне придётся всё же удалить Вас из канала, можете сделать скрин того что Вы поставили реакцию, это тоже считается ;) Чистка проводится для очищения от ненужной аудитории, которая не активна на канале.
😢9custom 53255963585418516732custom 54654808964569647632
Я сегодня плохо себя чувствую, сопли идут и дождь пришёл портить мне настроение Арта сегодня не будет, простите
😢2
Этой девчушке и фон не нужен, она прекрасна, мне она так нравится По моему за всё время это действительно хорошая поза Я НЕ МОГУ ОНА СУПЕР ❤ Персонажа придумала сама #арт
custom 53255963585418516739custom 52626428968755714581
Как я и говорила сегодня будет арт ^^ Спасибо за реакции
custom 54651637002372547925custom 53255963585418516733💘2custom 53281235645434555161
Хотели бы Вы розыгрыш/лотерею на звёзды? :)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
С Вас реакции с меня арты 10 реакций новый арт >:]
custom 532812356454345551611
Сегодня буду мало активна, но да ладно, самое главное что арт нарисовала ;) Это кстати арт на заказ ( мне за него заплатили, юпи ❤🥹) #арт #кот
custom 532559635854185167311custom 54654808964569647631
Вот и пост, наконец-то нашла
custom 52626428968755714584custom 53255963585418516731
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lovestoothles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хотели бы Вы розыгрыш/лотерею на звёзды? :)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Делать ли сегодня аукцион на персонажа? ( где участники соревнуются купить товар, предлагая свою цену)
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 838,036 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✏️{ Рисую арты }🖌️” (@lovestoothles), 225 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lovestoothles.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.