Channel
@lovely_book_lover
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
301subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002207432096 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lovely_book_lover |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lovely_book_lover |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 301 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 303 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 305 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 305 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 843 |
| Reactions total | 205 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
421 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5318934237200543597 | 156 | 37.1% | |
| ❤ | 150 | 35.6% | |
| 😁 | 81 | 19.2% | |
| 👏 | 34 | 8.08% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 421reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Тоннель Яна Вагнер 62% Пупупупупупупппуппу... Времени прошло много, а они всё ещё там. Начали строить догадки, почему так произошло... Мне кажется тут или по типу «метро» всё окажется, или что виновата рукожопость чья-то беспечность. Ну или какой-нибудь эксперимент ещё... Короче, я вся в догадках🫠
😁11custom 53189342372005435976❤3
Тоннель Яна Вагнер 41% Люди просидели в туннеле уже много часов, что только уже не произошло 🤪 Ситуация накалилась до предела во всех смыслах, но ещё больше половины книги впереди. Что там автор успела насочинять?🤔
custom 53189342372005435979❤4
Moonwalk Michael Jackson 100% Дочитала сегодня эту автобиографию. В целом любопытно, но больше наверное подойдёт для преданных фанатов😇 Плюсы + Истинный голос Майкла, будто он сам сидит рядом и рассказывает + Понимаешь, что он тоже живой человек. Чувствуется его и уязвимость, и перфекционизм, и некая наивность + Много классных фотографий, которые оживляют текст Минусы − Всё слишком приглаженно: чувствуется, что ос…
❤8custom 53189342372005435977
Тоннель Яна Вагнер 24% Решила послушать хорошо озвученную аудиокнигу и вспомнила про Яну Вагнер, которой Аня поёт дифирамбы😅😏😏😏 Ну что ж, сюжет меня захватил🙃. Совершенно обычные люди неожиданно оказались заперты в туннеле по непонятным причинам... Чем дело закончится, интересно...🤔
❤10custom 531893423720054359710
Moonwalk Michael Jackson 44% Интересная история под клубничный джем🥰😏 Вчера посмотрели фильм про Майкла Джексона и мне стало любопытно насколько там много художественной додумки. Начала копать и наткнулась на автобиографию😏 Написал он «Лунную походку» где-то лет в 28, так что скандальной части его жизни здесь не будет. А пока в книге много про становление Jackson 5 (группы, где был он и его братья). Не знала, что…
custom 531893423720054359710❤5
КНИЖНЫЙ ИЮЛЬ ✅Вечный зов Анатолий Иванов https://t.me/lovely_book_lover/1272 ✅ Доктор Живаго Борис Пастернак https://t.me/lovely_book_lover/1280 ✅The divorce Frida McFadden https://t.me/lovely_book_lover/1274 Ну в этом месяце вечный зов вне конкуренции, хорошая книга, хоть и пухляш☺️ А у вас что самое самое а месяц? #книжные_итоги_2026
❤16custom 53189342372005435972
Доктор Живаго Борис Пастернак #отзыв Дочитала вчера это произведение, впечатления неоднозначное. Давайте вместе попробуем разобраться Плюсы + Красивый поэтичный слог + Срез времени и его стихийность переданы очень живо и масштабно + Есть интересные судьбы (увлечено смотрела за Ларой) + Прекрасные стихи в конце Минусы - Сюжетная оборваность: автор что-то начинает рассказывать, а потом бац и уже другое время, дру…
custom 531893423720054359711👏6😁6❤2
Это я с Доктором Живаго на этой неделе🤣 #пятничка_мемятничка
😁21👏1
Борис Пастернак Доктор Живаго 555 из 589 Дочитала сам роман. Остались стихи... Пупупупупупупппуппу... Очень неоднозначные впечатления🫠
custom 531893423720054359714❤7
#пятничка_мемятничка
😁12custom 53189342372005435972❤1
Борис Пастернак Доктор Живаго 203 из 589 Читаю неспеша, с настороженностью из-за того, что кто-то в книжном клубе бросил читать, кто-то дочитал и плевался. Поэтому не понимаю нравится ли мне мне книга или нет🥲 Вроде бы красиво, местами интересно, иногда затянуто и непонятно. Пока я пытаюсь разобраться, лучше посмотрите на цитату на фотографии. Прям зацепила...🥹
❤8custom 53189342372005435978👏5
Борис Пастернак Доктор Живаго 38 из 589 Начала читать, опять куча персонажей🤪 Ну куда столько. Надеюсь, что автор нас сейчас с ними перезнакомит и дальше просто повествование пойдёт🤓 А вы читали?🤓
custom 531893423720054359714❤9👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lovely_book_lover. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 777,791 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кофе под шёпот страниц ☕️” (@lovely_book_lover), 301 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lovely_book_lover.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.