Channel
@lovebanknote
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,669subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001611162520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lovebanknote |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lovebanknote |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 1,669 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 1,673 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 1,673 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
451 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5253926982302860495 | 84 | 18.6% | |
| custom 5442836978468945877 | 73 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5233334177486635863 | 70 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5440460908071522742 | 60 | 13.3% | |
| custom 5267096421479255983 | 25 | 5.54% | |
| custom 5463143721283361717 | 24 | 5.32% | |
| custom 5256230875774877965 | 21 | 4.66% | |
| custom 5251220500071352905 | 16 | 3.55% | |
| custom 5249448671442923153 | 15 | 3.33% | |
| custom 5462935114721794913 | 14 | 3.10% | |
| custom 5321131452274847846 | 13 | 2.88% | |
| custom 5197195691297886269 | 12 | 2.66% | |
| custom 5267455403435789297 | 7 | 1.55% | |
| custom 5195359743102701032 | 6 | 1.33% | |
| custom 5269420935089241462 | 6 | 1.33% | |
| custom 5249467028133144159 | 2 | 0.443% | |
| custom 5251628358755715680 | 2 | 0.443% | |
| custom 5463056589281828176 | 1 | 0.222% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 451reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 25 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lovebanknote. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 December 2025 to 25 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
polymarket tge soon. хотят МАКСимальный массадопшен, теперь вход возможен через мессенджер макс. налоговую декларацию не нужно сдавать до 1 декабря, процент списывается автоматически после каждый ставки.
custom 523333417748663586312
Д - не тот за кого себя выдает!!! Странный пост спустя долгое время, но все же захотелось выставить эту ситуацию на всеобщее обозрение. Расскажу по пунктам сегодня о Д - @dhdhdddhhdd. Думаю все его знают. - В чем суть, он проводил конкурс - https://t.me/dolbaeb_trade/7034. Я как честный человек, зарегистрировался, прокрутил в последний день, потратил 350 долларов и пошел гулять. - 23 числа выходят результаты и …
custom 52333341774866358636
мекс нда темка итоги.
custom 523333417748663586328
НЕ УЧУСЬ НА ФИЛФАКЕ, НО ВСЕГДА FEELFUCK 🌪️ заметил что некоторые инфлы постят полезные видосы, мне недавно попался про WHOOP. ебанутый монтаж, а у них всего 2к подписчиков. сам недавно начал их носить. интересно кто-то их носит из подписчиков? про рекавари спрашивать не хочу, лучше скажи какой у тебя strain и sleep. ну а если не грузит видос, то doodle vpn. бесплатно неделю по моей ссылке, можно зашарить на 5 чело…
custom 523333417748663586310
ЭТО НЕ ЗАМЕДЛЕНИЕ ЭТО SLOWED & REVERB REMIX BY РКН 😭 сегодня сдох hit vpn, можешь сам прочитать у них в блоге. особенно в мск нах там чето вайтлисты какие-то, держи бота в тг который их обходит. doodle vpn. doodle vpn. doodle vpn. → 7 дней сразу бесплатно. → 5 человек на 1 подписку. → спб оплата или крипта, гайды по обходу и установке. понравится, юзай дальше. это сервис моего друга, если его посадят, то возг…
custom 523333417748663586314
— твоя солана упала, ты видел? — ой, да мне плевать. — ну она там 80$ стоит — 83.21$ 🚬
custom 544046090807152274231
сегодня был на лисян будто я паша воля. повыебывался, теперь поинтересуюсь. ты слушаешь войсы от инфлов, которые они в канал публикуют? от 5 минут хотя бы. там реально альфа или вода одна? 🩵 — слушаю 💔 — не слушаю
custom 544283697846894587773custom 544046090807152274229
использую инфлов по максимуму. видел в рилсах что у знаменитостей в директе часто незнакомые люди присылают список покупок и вообще используют как заметки диалог. я решил модернизировать и поступать также в телеге с инфлами. → миник. ему пишу когда хочу купить бананы, этот мужчина живет на островах и знает какие выбрать самые лучшие, верю только ему! → мей крипто. когда ловлю ночную мотивацию, сразу же пишу ему пр…
custom 546314372128336171724
😵 НЕ СТАВЬ ЦЕЛИ В 2026 ГОДУ Уже промотивировали себя стать лучше в новом году и расставили грандиозные цели? Я вот задумался, почему мы каждый год начинаем с одного и того же — расписываем себе планы, но по итогу уже через неделю забиваем на них и даже мысль о продолжении причиняет дискомфорт? Как же у других получается стать лучше и не слиться в прокрастинацию? Я решил разобраться: покопался в исследованиях и ней…
custom 525623087577487796517
творите добро 🙏🏼
custom 525392698230286049526custom 52562308757748779651
🚀 Rocket-чек на 1 USDT (1.0$) Внутри чека: 1 активация(й) по 1 USDT (1.0$)
custom 52539269823028604956custom 52562308757748779651
если нет друзей, тачки, телок. долбоебам только и остается что в тг канал писать на новый год.
custom 525392698230286049525custom 52562308757748779651
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lovebanknote. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 723,923 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“лавbank” (@lovebanknote), 1,669 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lovebanknote.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.