Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐“›๐“ธ๐“ฟ๐“ฎ ๐“๐“ท๐“ญ ๐““๐“ฎ๐“ฎ๐“น๐“ผ๐“น๐“ช๐“ฌ๐“ฎ ะั€ั‚ั‹๐ŸŒŒ

@loveanddeepspacearts

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

8,358subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002095779192
TypeChannel
Username@loveanddeepspacearts
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/loveanddeepspacearts

Growth

8,3588,4188,3887 August 2026 โ€” 8,418 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 8,411 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 8,380 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 8,358 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 8,349โ€“8,427 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:068,358-22
11 Aug 2026, 02:138,380-31
7 Aug 2026, 19:038,411-7
7 Aug 2026, 03:158,418first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
12.6%
avg views รท 8,358 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.2%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held43 (5 August 2026 โ€“ 12 August 2026)
Views total45,123
Reactions total5,498
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5,498 reactions across 43 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค3,16357.5%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ66512.1%
๐Ÿ”ฅ55510.1%
๐Ÿฅฐ5379.77%
๐Ÿ’‹2674.86%
๐Ÿ’˜1322.40%
๐Ÿ“571.04%
๐Ÿ˜551.00%
๐Ÿ˜˜350.637%
๐Ÿ™80.146%
๐Ÿ‘70.127%
๐Ÿคฉ70.127%
โ˜ƒ50.091%
๐Ÿ’…20.036%
๐Ÿค—20.036%
๐Ÿ’ฏ10.018%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 5,498reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 43 we hold a reading for ยท 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @loveanddeepspacearts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC261 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ะกะปะฐะดะบะธั… ัะฝะพะฒ ๐Ÿฆ‡ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ๐Ÿฆ‡ Cr: twt @/xenaaii #Xavier #MC

โค35๐Ÿ’˜3โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1

12 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC607 views106 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ะงะตะปะพะฒะตะบ-ะฟะฐัƒะบ ๐Ÿฆ‡ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ๐Ÿฆ‡ Cr: twt @/raonnni #Valko

โค77๐Ÿฅฐ15๐Ÿ™8๐Ÿ”ฅ3โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ’˜1

12 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC598 views76 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ะะตะพะฑั…ะพะดะธะผะฐั ะฟะตั€ะตะดั‹ัˆะบะฐ ๐Ÿฆ‡ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ๐Ÿฆ‡ Cr: twt @/iturqueen1 #Xavier #MC

โค66๐Ÿ’˜6โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4

12 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC682 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ะšะฐะบ ะฟั€ะพั…ะพะดะธั‚ ะฒะฐัˆะต ะปะตั‚ะพ? ๐Ÿฆ‡ ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ ๐Ÿฆ‡ Cr: twt @/fartbelly3 #Caleb

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ54โค16โ˜ƒ4๐Ÿ’˜3๐Ÿ’‹1

12 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC674 views124 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿฆ‡ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ๐Ÿฆ‡ Cr: tg @miru_MW #Valko

๐Ÿ”ฅ80๐Ÿฅฐ21โค10โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ7๐Ÿ’…2๐Ÿ’˜2๐Ÿคฉ2

12 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC674 views88 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ะ”ะฐะฒะฝะพ ะฝะต ะฑั‹ะปะพ ะบะพัะฟะปะตะตะฒ ๐Ÿฆ‡ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ๐Ÿฆ‡ Cr: twt @/thames_malerose #Zayne #cosplay

โค54๐Ÿ”ฅ21โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ9๐Ÿ’˜2๐Ÿคฉ2

12 Aug 2026, 05:49 UTC749 views119 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ะœะฐะปั‹ัˆะธ ๐Ÿฆ‡ ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ ๐Ÿฆ‡ Cr: twt @/ElowenEmbrace #Caleb #Zayne #Rafayel #Xavier #Sylus

โค84๐Ÿฅฐ23๐Ÿ’˜8โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4

12 Aug 2026, 05:22 UTC753 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿฆ‡ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ๐Ÿฆ‡ Cr: twt @/Syknigntrose #Sylus #MC

โค78โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ12๐Ÿ’˜2

12 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC771 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ะžะฑั€ะฐั‚ะธ ะฝะฐ ะผะตะฝั ะฒะฝะธะผะฐะฝะธะต! ๐Ÿฆ‡ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ๐Ÿฆ‡ Cr: twt @/llillia__ #Zayne

๐Ÿ”ฅ79๐Ÿ’‹18โค12๐Ÿ˜7โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ’˜3

12 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC764 views113 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ะŸะฐะฟะฐ ะ ะฐั„ะฐัะปัŒ ๐Ÿฆ‡ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ๐Ÿฆ‡ Cr: twt @/fishienyan_nyan #Rafayel

โค92โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ13๐Ÿฅฐ7๐Ÿ’˜1

11 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC984 views136 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

ะขั€ะตะฝะธั€ะพะฒะบะฐ. ๐Ÿคบ ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ ๐Ÿคบ Cr: twt @/lnk_mhru #Caleb

โค102๐Ÿ’‹22โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ9๐Ÿฅฐ3

11 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTCโ‰ˆ1,010 views162 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

ะะต ะปะตะฝะธะผัั. ๐Ÿคบ ะ˜ัั‚ะพั‡ะฝะธะบ ๐Ÿคบ Cr: twt @/Meili_Lds #Rafayel #Sylus #Caleb #Zayne #Xavier #Valko

๐Ÿฅฐ112โค25๐Ÿ“14โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ’˜3๐Ÿค—2

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @loveanddeepspacearts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 390,788 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐“›๐“ธ๐“ฟ๐“ฎ ๐“๐“ท๐“ญ ๐““๐“ฎ๐“ฎ๐“น๐“ผ๐“น๐“ช๐“ฌ๐“ฎ ะั€ั‚ั‹๐ŸŒŒโ€ (@loveanddeepspacearts), 8,358 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/loveanddeepspacearts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.