Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Love Letters « A & M

Channel

Love Letters « A & M

@lov_letters

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

71subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004383808762
TypeChannel
Username@lov_letters
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 7 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lov_letters

Growth

71817611 August 2026 — 81 subscribers11 August 2026 — 81 subscribers19 August 2026 — 75 subscribers25 August 2026 — 74 subscribers31 August 2026 — 71 subscribers11 August 202631 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 20 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70–83 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 10:5771-3
25 Aug 2026, 04:1874-1
19 Aug 2026, 00:3475-6
11 Aug 2026, 17:2281no change
11 Aug 2026, 04:4681first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52693025099560047181914.8%
custom 52673619148826535881612.5%
custom 52693584519050339521612.5%
custom 52695342792762002551612.5%
custom 54070517576352748901511.7%
custom 5267020984673666327129.38%
custom 5267508317432875851129.38%
custom 5269371517195548203118.59%
custom 5395844263814657196118.59%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC73 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

- Он просто жалок,что ты в нем нашла? - Яньхэн..

custom 52693025099560047184custom 52695342792762002554custom 52670209846736663272custom 52673619148826535881custom 52693584519050339521custom 53958442638146571961custom 54070517576352748901

7 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC70 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

« Марлен любил свою жену больше всех на свете,хоть она и была тщеславна,эгоистична,но когда его жене было нелегко,он любил ее чуть чуть сильнее » ➖

custom 52693584519050339526custom 52693025099560047183custom 52670209846736663272custom 53958442638146571962custom 52673619148826535881custom 54070517576352748901

7 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC57 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

One live – One love

custom 52673619148826535883custom 52675083174328758513custom 52693584519050339522custom 52695342792762002552custom 52670209846736663271custom 52693715171955482031custom 54070517576352748901

7 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC57 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Любовь — это не найти идеального человека, а увидеть идеальным того, кто рядом.

custom 52693025099560047184custom 52675083174328758513custom 52670209846736663272custom 52673619148826535882custom 52693715171955482032custom 52693584519050339521custom 52695342792762002551custom 53958442638146571961

7 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC55 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

真正的爱情,是双向奔赴。 Zhēnzhèng de àiqíng, shì shuāngxiàng bēnfù. «Настоящая любовь — это когда двое идут навстречу друг другу.»

custom 52695342792762002555custom 52673619148826535882custom 52693025099560047182custom 53958442638146571962custom 52670209846736663271custom 52693584519050339521custom 52693715171955482031custom 54070517576352748901

7 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC43 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

喜欢一个人,不是因为他完美,而是因为他就是他。 Xi huān yí ge rén, bú shì yīn wèi tā wán měi, ér shì yīn wèi tā jiù shì tā.

custom 54070517576352748903custom 52675083174328758512custom 52693025099560047182custom 52693715171955482032custom 53958442638146571962custom 52670209846736663271custom 52673619148826535881custom 52695342792762002551

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lov_letters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,370,288 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Love Letters « A & M” (@lov_letters), 71 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lov_letters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.