clean girl tuh kaya gimana guys? ada contohnya nggaaa? atau mungkin ada contoh saran lain jugaa boleh send ke bot aja yaap, thankies! 💕 @louvranebot

Channel
louvrane. (slow up)
@louvrane
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,673subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002858377472 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @louvrane |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/louvrane |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 3,673 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 3,671 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 3,671 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
345 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 128 | 37.1% | |
| 🍓 | 117 | 33.9% | |
| ☃ | 57 | 16.5% | |
| 🦄 | 43 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 345reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2025 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 5.00%
- 1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 7,970
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 11,200
- over 19 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20251128101214577415010300166601951681311 | 1 | 28 November 2025 | 28 November 2025 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2025 to 1 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
theme material yang lagi rame, apa ya louvses?
test
h-h-h-hi…. l-l-l-long time no see ^___^
🍓26💘11☃7🦄6
merry christmas and happy holidays! 🎄☃️
☃16💘3🍓1🦄1
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤ 𑣿. ('epithet. free cu—pu ; dynamic arboreal sentinels)ㅤ 연꽃! artwork release &. wind blowing over #lotus petals ( 🪷 ꩜ .ᐟ ) ㅤㅤㅤㅤ
🍓45💘19🦄16☃15
Sticker, posted without a caption
SALFOKKK, GEMAAASSS! 💖___<
💘15
heheheehhehe, boleh di isii yaa! semoga ngga php-in kalian terusss yaaa. kita usahain update se cepat mungkin💖
📝 saranin update yuk, louvses! 💖 👤 CLEAN GIRLLL 👤 polkadot 👤 gadis sampul 👤 MATERIAL ROMCOM PLSPLSPLSSSS 👤 kakkk saran material nyc, parisian, pink poetry dan light poetry donggg 👤 kak pls filter pink poetry 💞 👤 kaka, aku cinta material disini.. mau req banyakin nyc dan poetry gitu dong 👤 autumn atau analog gituu dong kak 👤 Mau material funky west 👤 romcom doonggg!! 👤 nyc girl & romcom pwis 👤 yang buku' g…
next update mau yang mana duluu?
- nyc64%
- pink poetry36%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @louvrane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
next update mau yang mana duluu?
- nyc64%
- pink poetry36%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2025 to 1 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 847,475 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Arsipaankita · 31 postCREDIT ‼️
@claviene · 61 post꒰ hou’s do♡dles˖ ་ ꒱
@housite · 131 post🪼. 𝐈𝐕𝐀𝐍𝐊𝐀 𝐀𝐑𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐒
@IvankaArchives · 261 post🎵
@lacetied · 31 postCr jira
@lipstipk · 21 postm.p
@loesdco · 21 post𝓗eart : crafts archives 𖹭.ᐟ
@manxjur · 21 postmaterials @JOCESTR
@MtrialZyrn · 31 postletters tiny showpiece. ♡
@qblouse · 51 postunknown
@statesupd · 121 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“louvrane. (slow up)” (@louvrane), 3,673 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/louvrane.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.